Terrence Williams PR Department (AKA STOP TWEETING)

You don't like T-Will, everyone already gets that. People are upset at RA for not playing T-Will, because we are losing and yet, inexplicably, he plays garbage players like Budinger instead. As much as you dislike T-Will, if you cannot see that he is better than someone like Budinger, you are just pretty stupid.

 

First, I never said I dislike TWon't. In fact, I said I like his talents. But talents alone doesn't complete a player.

Second, calling me stupid is pretty silly and tell me you don't have facts to back up your big mouth.

 

Someone needs to learn English before posting again. The fact that you call him TWon't means you dislike him. It is a simple psychological fact that you do not give negative nicknames or talk bad about players you like. The fact that you continue to refer to him as TWon't exposes your bias. Talent doesn't complete a player and that is true. However, this is not even talent we are talking about. T-William is just a better and more complete player than Budinger. Budinger does not defend and can't even hit an open shot. TWill can not only score as well, but play defense, multiple positions, and has great court vision.

I never called you stupid. I said that if you can't see that TWill is a better player than Budinger, then you are stupid. Unless you are admitting that you believe a player who can score, pass, defend, and rebound is worse than a player who cannot do anything, then no I am not calling you stupid. Again, learn English please. Also, you want facts, go to rockets.com and see how crappy Budinger is doing. Carry on kid!

 

Very rude... T-Will could be very good, but you act like Budinger is a walking corpse...Bud is still a great athlete and a MUCH better shooter than T-Will, he and doesnt want to play out of position. I like Terrence, but the fact that he is insisting so strongly that he is a pg when he is the picture perfect mold of a sg/sf bugs me. He may never be content with just playing, he wants to play point.. If he were ok with playing the 2 or 3 I'd say unleash this guy, but he's said that he doesnt wanna be a scorer, he wants to be a point....comments like these worry me....

 

Adelman is the stupid one here.

 

Yes Bud can be a good athlete, but how often does he utilize it aside from occasional dunks? Almost never. Yes he can be a good shooter, but he hasn't been hitting anything for most of the season. So what use is a player who cannot fulfill his only job, shooting the ball? As far as I am concerned, Bud is worse than a walking corpse. He is a defensive sieve on one end and a construction worker on the other.

He wants to play point? That's fine. Let him run with the 2nd unit and see how that hashes out. It can't be any worse than how we are currently doing, which is losing. What's the worst thing that can happen? He loses more and gets us a higher draft position as well as answering questions about his potential? At least he wants to pass, unlike Mr. Dribble the clock away and look to make a bad shot or pass Brooks. Look towards the bigger picture here.

 

This.

We won't be coming close to winning a championship this season and it's become painstakingly obvious that this AB off the bench thing isn't going to be a long term solution for the rockets, so why not give Terrence some playing time?

 

TWill has played almost as many minutes in his career as Bud has, and I hate to break it to you, but TWill is the worst offensive player in the NBA.

http://www.basketball-reference.com...t=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=off_rtg&order_by_asc=Y

 

According to that, Amir Johnson and Birdman are 2 of the top 4 offensive players in the NBA.

Get a clue.

 

Pwnage... Haha

 

So Sloan would make this team top 8 for sure but yet his on Utah Jazz was sitting in the 7th spot and they are more talented than this Rockets team.

Utah is 17th in pts allowed this season. Not so much of a juggernaut team.

Sloan wouldn't do **** for this current squad.

 

.600+ TS%, very good ORB% will do that.

Anyway, if you only wanna account for those that touch the ball a lot, here you go.

http://www.basketball-reference.com...c5comp=gt&c6mult=1.0&c6stat=&order_by=off_rtg

Remember folks, stats are only as good as those who know what they mean.

 

Ouch. Let's also point out that Budinger is a year YOUNGER than TWill. Double-ouch.

 

Dude its clear by now Sloan didnt have a grip on this team like he used to. He just didnt have the grip he wanted to have. Most of the players sided with Deron and Sloan could not control their games like he used to. With so much chaos in their chemistry I am astounded how they still managed to sit in the top 8. They have had their share of injuries as well. D-Will was out, Okur in and out and AK has been out all this time.

If only you guys used the same level of accountabiltiy for Aldeman. What is his record for points aloowed this this season? Hypothetically if we had Milsap in his 2nd year on this squad with Jordan Hill - Aldeamn would still stick with Hill. If we had AK in his 2nd year along with Bud - he would still play Bud. Thats Aldeman for you.

When you say he developed Brooks and Landry - was there really another choice but to play them? I mean should Aldeamn get the credit for playing Brooks when there was no one else but Rafer. Thats just the common thing to do.

 

The Rockets defense has been bad and yes Adelman is to blame for some since he is the coach. I just find it funny that half of you blame Adelman for the defense when you say people say

We have a 6'6 center that can't protect the paint.
Scola isn't a good defender
Hill sucks
Battier is past his prime
Martin is one of the worst defenders
Brooks is one of the worst defenders

Yet Adelman is still to blame by a lot of you. Like I said Jerry Sloan would not get this team anywhere. Period

 

What does these stats mean?

T-Will when given minutes.

Team pts reb ast

Clev 21 5 7
Orl 14 4 4
Nyk 3 11 7
Mem 14 6 6
Dal 18 13 3
Okc 14 6 3
Hou 14 2 4
Atl 15 6 4
Phi 13 7 3
Tor 13 8 4
Mia 9 8 7
Det 13 6 8
Chi 16 6 2
Sas 13 7 3
Pho 21 5 9
Nor 14 4 14
Was 15 3 4
Mil 6 4 0
Chi 27 13 10
Ind 15 3 4
Cha 21 13 6
Mia 2 5 3

 

27, 13, and 10 in a double-digit win over Chicago.

 

meh
His rookie and sophomore numbers are beyond bad.
Dude is a work in progress that we all knew
and you want to compare those data to those of some veteran players.......

 

Besides Bud is not the problem here, Brooks is.

 

Anything to prove a point.