Taking less money defeats the purpose of Salary Cap?

heypartner · May 13, 2012

roslolian said: ↑

The problem here is you'd have a ton of teams overpaying on guys, and it won't just be Lebron and Wade. For example OKC would have to spend roughly the same amount on KD and WB, Bulls would be tied up with Rose and Boozer, Lakers with Kobe and Gasol etc. etc.

What would happen is each team would have 2 good guys and a bunch of no names, while the rest of the NBA would divided into MAX guys and minimum guys, with almost no in between. Also with such high salaries their would be almost no movement or trades between team, unless its one max guy swapped for another max guy. I'm not sure I want to see that kind of league.
Click to expand...

sorry you don't make sense. what is your point?

Fact is: NBA Salary cap has never created competitive balance. The NBA has never had competitive balance.

Those are facts....what are you talking about?

Forums

Taking less money defeats the purpose of Salary Cap?

Do you think that stars taking less money kills purpose of Salary Cap?

Yes

No

heypartner Member

Share This Page

About ClutchFans

Rockets Content

Support ClutchFans!