1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Supreme Court's ON! Clash over assisted Suicide

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by nyquil82, Oct 6, 2005.

  1. geeimsobored

    geeimsobored Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    3,389
    Well its not really a major issue because only one state has adopted it. However, should the supreme court rule in favor of oregon, that will probably set off a wave of new states that will sign on and introduce some sort of assisted suicide law.

    Look no one on this thread has presented one reason not have a law like this. As irrelevant as it may seem to some, it really means the world to the few who are affected by it. (whether relatives or those who actually are provided assistance with suicide) For those who literally are months away from dying and are in absolute pain to the point where they cant eat or barely move, why not have a law like this.
     
  2. insane man

    insane man Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    5
    i think that highlights an important point about american society. we delay death and refuse to discuss/think about it.

    i think if most people discussed it they might not necessarily come to the conclusion that they'd be willing to take meds to end their life. but they'd certainly rethink not allowing those who are in very painful situations to not make their own decision.
     
  3. MartianMan

    MartianMan Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    1,745
    Likes Received:
    3
    You had a point? I thought your point was that people who wanted to die can shoot themselves. It's obviously a bad point, since many cannot kill themselves properly even if they wanted to. There are few replies in this thread because very few people oppose it. Or rather, the people who oppose it haven't formed a proper argument to refute the idea.
     
  4. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    I think it only civil that we assist people who are ready to die with a dignified process rather than making them perpetrate some kind of clumsy violence to themselves that may or may not succeed and may implicate one of their loved ones.
     
  5. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    No, that's was just a random illustration targeting the fact that it doesn't really seem to matter. Though, I would still argue that nearly anyone that wants to kill themselves can find some way to do it, even extremely sick, fragile, weak people. They just can't all kill themselves quickly and painlessly. I don't even know what properly means in this context.

    Of course this issues will become more important if hundreds of people start getting assisted suicide - as it was briefly over a decade ago. If millions of people start toking on the streets on a daily basis, the illegality of mary jane will become more important, too.
     
  6. nyquil82

    nyquil82 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2002
    Messages:
    5,174
    Likes Received:
    3

    Maybe, but I have no doubt that the reason this law exists is because the people of Oregon voted for it. Twice. I mean, have any of you been to Oregon? What if your NBA team was the Trailblazers?
     
  7. MR. MEOWGI

    MR. MEOWGI Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2002
    Messages:
    14,382
    Likes Received:
    13
    Oregon is pretty cool.
     

Share This Page