Talk about waste of time, I actually opened this thread again, my bad... I need to start a religion thread
Can't believe that rubbish like this can still garner five pages of response. I've said it before; any "conspiracy" involving Barack Obama would extend to the highest levels of the government, as that's what it would require for a man to be elected President and actually not be a proper US citizen. They haven't been sitting around for nearly two years from the time he announced his candidacy to now as he effectively acts a "proxy" President saying, "Man, we should really get on that." Get over it. The 44th President of the United States of America is a black man named Barack Hussein Obama II.
..just how did you learn about Clinton and Edwards's marital affairs ? you read it from the press clippings.
That's silly. Only native Americans like Rush Limbaugh or Reagan loves this country, and Barack isn't a Native.
This is entertaining in the same way watching the 9/11-as-inside-job is entertaining, and by that I mean extremely entertaining.
yeah Blackwater mercenaries are around to protect US citizens whom they hold an unbreakable oath of allegiance to. Gun sales are skyrocketing while our economy is in the dumps for absolutely no reason. If there is civil unrest the military can and will take your guns away like they did to Katrina victims. conspiracies though!!
can you please provide a link showing the govt. taking guns from Katrina victims? I hadn't seen those reports.
When I saw pgab mention the guns, I knew Red Chocolate would show up. So, is this gun grab a Bush plan (since he's the one that's put all the Blackwater mercenaries in place for the takeover) or an Obama plan (since he's the one that would profit from it)? Or do they both report to a secret higher power?
Here's one: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2005/sep/23/20050923-105240-4724r/. It bears mentioning that the court upheld the people's right to keep their guns and hopefully that recent example will keep future law enforcement organizations from thinking conditions justify this confiscation.
Powerful anecdotes come from people like grandmothers. A normal anecdote might come from a CF.net poster. The intriguing thing to me is that this would have been so simple to chase away. It began months before the election, so it's not just a reaction to Obama's election. It was an issue with his candidacy and his handlers just staved off as if they were above the fray. Yet questions still persist. All of you can write the concern as right-wing racist drivel but I voted for the guy in spite of the indecisive handling of this matter. Can I just see a baby picture with Macadamia nut trees/bushes in the background? Those of you who chime in with "he doesn't have to do that" don't know how weak that makes you look?
In your example you are asking for something that is in no way accusatory. Asking for additional proof after proof has already been given in something where it is accusatory is a different matter.
