I see the new rules destroying the Spurs. Sure, they will play good D, but who is going to shoot over that zone? Porter? I predict the Spurs will average 83 points per game next year, while holding opponents to 89. Good D, laughable O. ------------------ Protrolls.com! "I want to be like Olajon." -Sagana Diop has the right idea...
ZRB, Check the fantasy forum... you now have a team. ------------------ EDDIE, EDDIE, EDDIE!!! Draftsource.net-- the premier source for draft info. Profiles, rankings, mock drafts, and more! The Mo Taylor Fan Site
MrSpur: While I agree that some of the criticism is unfair, there are a couple of real problems for the Spurs: 1. Duncan has already made it pretty clear by signing that short deal that he doesn't want to put up with rebuilding. Once David Robinson retires, the Spurs need to find an immediate replacement. My money is on them not doing so; they could, but the odds are against it. 2. They really do need perimeter defense. I wouldn't be surprised if DA comes back... and I do think Tony Parker was a steal. But he's not going to be ready yet. The SF and PG spots are going to be defensive sieves. granted, you can get away with a bit with the twin towers, but it's still a concern. 3. They obviously need to improve some, but have few avenues of doing so. Pretty self-explanatory. 4. Popovich is very mediocre. I don't think he's a bad coach; he gives good discipline. But I don't think he maximizes his players well and he doesn't adjust to rotations effectively. Before a game, Pop is a great coach. During... not so fabulous. I'm not just being insulting - while Rudy T is a great with personell, he's only average at best with X's and O's. ------------------ Clutchcity.net... source for all your Rockets, Astros, political, music, humor, and Gordita news.
Ok, I am not one to say the Spurs suck or they will be in the lottery next year. I think they will still do well, even with holes in the starting 5. Hell, they won a championship with a not 100% Elliot, a shell of Elie, and AJ... DA will be a Spur, too. But, MrSpur, you are obviously letting hometown fanaticism cloud your judgement. 1. DA was nowhere near 100% when he returned, according to HIS OWN WORDS. He just thought he could help, so he gave it a try. Players always do that - look at Zo..he still might be finished for good, but he had to take his window to play. 2. Robinson is a good center. But he is no longer great and he is poor against LA. Unfortunately for SA, with their style they need him to be. They could not beat LA as the Bucks or teams with different types of lineups could. 3. There is a huge hole at the 3. I have read that Ferry won't be back, as well. Don't know how valid that is...just read it. Unless there is a trade, there are very few choices for getting a new 3. If there is a trade, who do the Spurs have to use as bait? After Duncan, Robinson, and Anderson, the lineup is not very appealing. Add to that that the Spurs are now not that deep so a trade could really hurt, even if it is with someone such as Rose(much better than Walker) or Daniels. 4. Popovich is at best an average coach. I really thought the Spurs could do better against the Lakers. That shows lack of heart and motivation and coaching. Sure, DA was unavailable and then 60% at best, but the Sixers were torn up beyond belief and got one game. Basically, I think the Spurs will have a good record -- no matter what -- but not go far in the playoffs. Unless there are serious changes in personnel and attitude, it will stay that way and then get worse when Duncan bolts. He signed a limited deal for a reason. Once Robinson is gone -- if the Spurs don't change -- Duncan is gone. ------------------ Squatting on old bones and excrement and rusty iron, in a white blaze of heat, a panorama of naked idiots stretches to the horizon. Complete silence-their speech centers are destroyed-except for the crackle of sparks and the popping of singed flesh as they apply electrodes up and down the spine. White smoke of burning flesh hangs in the motionless air. A group of children have tied an idiot to a post with barbed wire and built a fire between his legs and stand watching with bestial curiosity as the flames lick his thighs. His flesh jerks in the fire with insect agony. [This message has been edited by rimbaud (edited June 29, 2001).]
You r co-rect!! Really though the Spurs will be lucky to get 49 wins next season. ------------------ "Basketball is truth, and J-Dub is a lie..." I know basketball and most GM's don't...sometimes the best rooster move is no move at all. What makes your team successful is truly knowing when it's time to make a change and who is the player to help you do it.
The bottom line is that the Spurs are still the best team in the league other than the Lakers if they retain the Admiral and DA. We can't dis the Spurs, if they are a much better team than we are. True, the Spurs have some of the worst character and hustle in the league, they are a soft team. Pop is not a great coach, he is a half-decent coach who doesn't know what he is doing a lot of the times. The Spurs didn't win 58 games as a joke, they are a great team, but not nearly as great as the Lakers. Mr. Spur, David Robinson flat out gave up against Shaq, he didn't go toe to toe with Shaq in the paint like Mutumbo did. DRob is a soft player, everybody in the league knows that. ZRB, the Spurs had the best 3 pt. shooting % in the league last year. Of course, it went out the window against the Lakers. But, they have excellent 3 pt. shooters in Ferry, Porter, Daniels, and DA. They just need to get more athletic shooters like DA on their team at PG. Parker may be able to help. So they do have shooters to attack the zone. In fact, they have better 3 pt. shooters than we do. ------------------ "I look kind of dumpy. Look at my butt. And what kind of shoes do they have me wearing? At least they got the chinstrap beard right." -Kevin Garnett on the KG bobblehead dolls during KG bobblehead doll night at the Target Center [This message has been edited by LiLStevie3 (edited June 29, 2001).]
This is all true, but the team will be up against zone defense now. The Spurs could not shot against the Lakers with there great defend of the 3pt line, now image teams that could not defend the Spurs being able to shadow the post AND still be able to get out at the 3pt. shooters eariler. Now if you pull the shot back and blow past the defender running at you, he can put a hand on you now and not get a cheap foul called. Really if the league watched the series closely...the Spurs can be beat by teams that had no chance last year. ------------------ "Basketball is truth, and J-Dub is a lie..." I know basketball and most GM's don't...sometimes the best rooster move is no move at all. What makes your team successful is truly knowing when it's time to make a change and who is the player to help you do it.
So let's see...Barkley took a one year deal for the minimum in order to clear cap space in '99, but Robinson won't? Spurs just waived Walker today, so that's brings the total up to $22 million in potential cap space. DA's not getting the max and Robinson has indicated that he is willing to be flexible with his contract. As for who will shoot over the zone, I would think that between Anderson, Daniels, Ferry, and Porter, all who shot 40% or better on their 3s, that is a start. At least take a look at the roster. The Spurs know that they must improve. They are certainly not thinking small when it comes to trades and free agency. The one thing that is for certain is that they are not standing pat, especially not after the way the season ended. As for DA, the point is that the injury wasn't serious enough to keep him from returning during the playoffs. The bottomline is that the Spurs are not exactly at death's door like some of you hometown HTown fellows would hope. I'm glad to see that at least one thinking man recognizes that. I guess the Spurs have been banned from making personnel moves? ------------------ It's a cool site, this clutchcity.net
Every team has its shortcomings. Let's just remember that the Spurs have the Twin Towers, and as long as those guys are around, it's gonna be tough to get any points vs. the Spurs. As far as The Admiral getting screwed, I imagine the talks with Dave will be going on at just about the exact same time as the talks with Derek Anderson. Heck, they may even sign Anderson first, and give Dave whatever's left. I don't think they'd give the Admiral a screw job. ------------------ Founding Father of the Refs Suck Club
DRob is a top 5 center in this league. Who else is there? O'Neal/Mutombo/Mourning/??? ------------------ It's a cool site, this clutchcity.net
Well, they are about to clear $22 mil in cap space. Sure, they have to re-sign DA and Robinson, but is DA going to get the max? Nope. And Robinson has indicated he will be flexible with salary in order to improve the team. Say Anderson gets a deal starting at $6.5 mil and Robinson at one year for $5 mil...that leads to $10.5 mil in cap space. If DRob takes even less, there is more to work with. Pretty self-explanatory... ------------------ It's a cool site, this clutchcity.net [This message has been edited by MrSpur (edited June 29, 2001).]
dave will make at least 6-9 million per, Mr.Spur. dave is not barkley. barkley is not dave. barkley has heart. dave has no heart. and i have YET to see you mention an impact frontcourt OR backcourt player the spurs can reasonably pick up. corie blount??? if dave's a top 5 center, do you think he'll allow d anderson to make more money than he does? d anderson is making at least 6 million next year. count on dave - the top 5 center - making at least 7 (the absolute lowest). EVEN SO... who can they get to improve the team? spurs won't suck, but they will be worse than last year.
Any team with Tim D will be good. But the Spurs have no quality PG and are glaringly, and I mean glaringly, unathletic at the 3 spot. The French PG is a good pick, but don't expect him to contribute until D Rob is out of the league, and as a very late 1st rounder it is not like he for sure will be a starting quality player at all. I thought teams would have realized by now that you can't put a one dimesional shooter like Dennis Scott, Chuck Person or Danney Ferry in the 3 spot and hope to beat a great team. Great teams nuetrilize 1 dimensional players. The Spurs have tried this twice and it has failed. I don't see the Spurs really upgrading 1, 2, or 3 spot enough to make them better than the Lakers. We will see if they can improve the versitility and athleticsm of their team, Mr Spur thinks they can, I don't think they will be able to.
Although I love Barkley, you could also say Dave has a ring. Barkley has no ring. The argument that Dave had Duncan is weak. Barkley had Olajuwon and Drexler but failed after that b*stard Stockton sank the shot. Plus he had Olajuwon and Quitten(who turned out to be a bust) and Olajuwon and Francis. He also had KJ. ------------------ "I look kind of dumpy. Look at my butt. And what kind of shoes do they have me wearing? At least they got the chinstrap beard right." -Kevin Garnett on the KG bobblehead dolls during KG bobblehead doll night at the Target Center [This message has been edited by LiLStevie3 (edited June 29, 2001).]
So basically the argument here is that the Spurs cannot improve themselves despite their cap space? Think about that for a sec...if someone said the Rockets won't be able to improve themselves with their cap space this summer you would disagree with that. Gee...the Rockets aren't my favorite team, but I don't let my apathy cloud my judgement. They will improve upon the areas in which they need help with their cap space just like the Spurs will this summer. ------------------
um, Mr.Spur, how does that Spurs "cap flexibility" help them address their frontcourt problems? again, name me a player they are looking at in the frontcourt. don't tell me, "pop runs a tight ship" because so does every other team in the nba. yet, you still hear of who they are looking at. didn't you hear last summer they were looking at derek anderson and danny ferry? i did. but you aren't really hearing that this summer. at least not yet. again, all i've heard is shandn andersn, and i agree, that it is not a good fit. re: eddie robinson of course he's desirable and reasonable! but that does not mean that they will get him. 1st, although i might be wrong on this, i have not seen anything stating that e-rob "wants" to leave charlotte. yes, he can make more $$$, but that isn't always "the" deciding factor. factor in players that have left san antonio and said that they will "NEVER" player for san antonio again. fact in the fact that pop is not exactly well respected as an "intelligent" coach around the league. whether you agree or not, there are other factors as to whether a player comes over or not. and i'm betting that eddie robinson won't be in san anto. besides, i don't think he's the solution for san antonio anyways. his j beyond 18' is questionable, and with the inside game the spurs have, they HAVE TO be able to stretch the defense. re: jaren jackson/samaki walker starting... i NEVER stated that they will be starting. that was another poster above me. if they start, pop should be assasinated. re: dave v. shaq so you're basically conceding the fact that dave doesn't even battle shaq anymore, right? cause i don't care what he did in the first 5 years of shaq's career. bottom line is that he won't stand up to shaq, the same way as he won't stand up to karl malone. shaq basically has called dave a b****, then gone out and proven it. this isn't about shutting shaq down. this isn't about shaq being the best center in the nba in his prime. this is about dave giving 150% not 100% not 98.9% on both ends and making shaq know that he is there. dave played like a b**** against shaq, sorry. at least dike stood his ground. but you already conceded this one...dave did not stand his ground. re: derek anderson. dude, you've got to be joking. you don't think nba players play less that 100%? you don't think nba players rush back from injuries only to reaggravate/worsen that injury? "if he came back, he must have been ok"???? derek anderson couldn't hit his ass with either hand agaist the lakers. are you saying that's because he can't shoot, or are you saying it's because he was still hurt? i'm guessing it's answer #2, and you let your mouth run off before your brain thought about it.
Since the Rockets don't really have a need for him anymore, Mike Miller might be a good fit in San Antonio. He's young, he can shoot, and is ready to start as either a 2-guard or a Small Forward. If D.Anderson re-ups with them, they could have a young talented core of Duncan, Miller, Anderson and Daniels. With that team and Robinson, Porter, Ferry and a 7-footer off the bench, they could seriously challenge the Lakers next year. And asides for the center spot (which Duncan could move to), they'd be set for the future as well. In addition to a solid starting 3, and a big body off the bench, what the Spurs really need is a tough player, who is willing to do the dirty work, ala Ellie. They need someone to challenge them, and give them an edge. Bo Outlaw comes to mind as a player who could fit that bill. Maybe even the Junkyard Dog himself could head back to Texas. Azim da Dream ------------------ "Africa is a nation that suffers from incredible disease." - Geroge W. Bush, commenting on the troubled continent, to reporters in Sweden
Ok...since i started this thread about the Spurs i may as well stop all the questions now. 1)You don't have $22 million to sign free agents, because...you haven't signed Dave and DA yet!! And for you to think that Dave and DA will not eat up at least $15 million is beyond common sense. Then you have to sign the two rookies which will be at least $1 million if you don't give them any money. Plus i thought Ferry was a free agent, and if Sean doesn't retire you have to sign him. Don't even get me on AJ who i think will realize no one wants a point guard that can't shoot over a zone so he may settle for less to stay. Now with all this cap room YOU still have to sign a starting 3 and now maybe two post players that will give you heart and toughness. On top of that you still don't have anyone to defend the big guards, because Rose can't hold everyone. So again it's not that you won't sign anybody, but YOU can't sign anybody. 2)I just hope that the Lakers are not calling Walker right now to sign him, and replace the 4 that they sent to the Bucks. If so the Lakers just got Hunter and Walker basically for free...Stop helping the Lakers!! 3)Let's again address this FREE AGENT signing thing for the Spurs. All players that have left the Spurs have said that they would not go back. Mario Ellie, Will Perdue, Terry Cummings, Cory Alexander, and a few more. On the flip side, all free agents that HAVE gone to San Antonio again came from a distressed situation. Derek Anderson the Clippers (would you have gone back?), Danny Ferry the Cavs (you can see they suck), Walker the Mavericks (again at the time they sucked), Mario Ellie the Rockets (Pippen was signed so he would have been benched), Steve Kerr the Bulls (last of the players jumping ship), Tim Duncan re-signed so San Antonio can get the NEW arena and keep the Spurs in SA (you know if he didn't the Spurs would have sucked), DA re-signed because...Duncan re-signed. Terry Porter from the Heat (the Spurs just WON the *Championship and he wanted one), and really i can go on...but i think you know you messing with a HEAVYWEIGHT!! Spurs can't sign anyone because no one wants to go there if they have a better choice. Mr. Spur and Spurever i already know that you are Pop and Holt trying to defend what you know, but i got alotta mo' if you want to go... ...Checkmate ------------------ Take the blue pill, and wake up from the computer dream world. I'm a fan of basketball, and knowing the truth for some means finally facing it...