Bingo. But neither implies "dynasty". Dynasty implies sustained dominance, not just being elite for a long time. None of the Bird Celts, Duncan Spurs, or Shaq Lakers (let's not fool ourselves that it can be attached to Kobe's any more than the Bulls were Pippen's or the Celt's were Parrish's) refect sustained dominance. Sustained excellence/eliteness (Celts, Spurs) or brief dominance (Lakers) is what their strecthes were.
I was wondering the same thing too. Somewhere in an ESPN break room, employees are having a good laugh.
