Box office is not the data you should be looking at. Public sentiment and buyin of the ideas intrinsically linked to movies like this would be more appropriate. For example, the people here who defend the idea of a woman 007 probably won't go watch the movie. That doesn't stop them from buying the idea of a woman 007 and everything that goes along with it and swallowing it whole. Hypothetically, the work is done in the minds of Hollywood. The movie being a hit would be the cherry on top.
Every group on the planet has an "agenda" but I figure when you use the term "leftist agenda" you imply some kind of secret conspiracy that is riddled with dark intentions. Generally speaking, having been exposed to the left - most movements begin by a small group and they try to expand it to make it grow. There have been many movements that have grown and fizzled over time. The left is not unified - depending on how broad you consider the left. There is no one who represents the "left". The left is not organized and there isn't a consensus on things as much as there is on the right. That part of the problem Democrats have. They represent the far left all the way to the very center. And in any case, the right is just as guilty of what the left does. Take the whole PC thing the right complains about incessantly. Yet the right has a problem with someone kneeling or burning a flag or criticizing border agents - that's all just a form of political correctness. What about Trump's agenda? Why does he keep invoking racial divisions - even the right is critical of him in many cases on this.
I would agree with this paragraph. There is a split within the left between the extreme AOC/Omar branch, and what might be described as the Schumer/Pelosi branch. But there's a lot they all agree on, and that's having the government be much more involved in our life: from Obama's "Life of Julia" and Obamacare to AOC's GND, to Warren's Medicare for All.
