1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

SI NBA Preview 2005 Projections

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Rockets34Legend, Oct 18, 2005.

?

?!?

  1. This is accurate.

    144 vote(s)
    41.9%
  2. This is total crap!

    200 vote(s)
    58.1%
  1. droxford

    droxford Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2001
    Messages:
    10,598
    Likes Received:
    2,131
    ROCKETS WILL WIN THE WEST
    (you heard it here first)

    ... so, chart is total crap.
     
  2. daoshi

    daoshi Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,021
    Likes Received:
    75
    I think they got about 50% right, which isn't saying much.
     
  3. xiayun78

    xiayun78 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    1
    The same token about ranking us as No. 4 seed applies to ranking Phoenix No. 3. It doesn't mean the writer believes they will have the 3rd best record. They are just in a not-so-good division on paper, and for now, still have the benefit of the doubt to be the best in that division. It could turn out to be another NL West of baseball (where Padres won with 82-80 record) or NFL North of football (where the division is so bad a team with 7-9 record could win in the end). Kings do look intriguing, and both Lakers and Warriors probably will improve, but still the division doesn't look too good. That's why the writer had 4 out of top 8 western teams from our division.
     
  4. Fegwu

    Fegwu Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    5,162
    Likes Received:
    4
    This is why I hate this new alignment.

    With the way things stand now, there is no way the Rox and Spurs can play in the WC finals if one of them finish unfavorably (like the scenario SI has up there).

    I wish the NBA will change this setup in the near future.
     
  5. david_rocket

    david_rocket Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,488
    Likes Received:
    834
    I think this prediction is good, is very nice comparing to other prredictions.
     
  6. jeremyang2002

    jeremyang2002 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    0
    Eastern part is OK except Pacers being No.1.
    Western part is totally crap.
    1.Sun wont be No.1 in Pacific divison without Amare.
    2.Seattle and Memphis wont make playoffs this year.
    3.Even his regular season prediction is correct, you wont see Spurs in finals. :)
     
  7. Bullard4Life

    Bullard4Life Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    1,470
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think their prediction is fairly accurate. However, why would anyone pick an Amare-less Suns to finish ahead of the Sacramento Kings? I mean, neither team really plays defense and the Kings should have a better offense. I think the Kings will be the #2 seed and will probably get to the WC Finals as long as their draw is favorable.
     
  8. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,887
    Likes Received:
    12,980
    The East looks fairly accurate.

    Memphis will not make the playoffs, and I doubt Seattle will, either, but calling the West is tough. I see Golden State and maybe the Clippers or the Jazz sneaking into the last two spots (my choices wouldn't be too popular, either).
     
  9. Lobo

    Lobo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 1999
    Messages:
    499
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes I agree the three-division setup sucks big time. Seems like it penalizes teams in a powerhouse division too much, and assures that they will never meet in the conference finals.
     
  10. harumph

    harumph Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2001
    Messages:
    592
    Likes Received:
    0
    i think it is accurate, if you consider it playoff seedings. then we will finish either 1st or 4th, and you can allow them to put the defending champs at #1.

    I think the playoff brackets are totally out though
     
  11. R0ckets03

    R0ckets03 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 1999
    Messages:
    16,326
    Likes Received:
    2,042

    Thank you Nostradamus. :rolleyes:

    Suck the Fpers.
     
  12. KellyDwyer

    KellyDwyer Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,660
    Likes Received:
    86
    I'm not sticking up for the rankings for the sake of sticking up for the rankings, and I still think the Rockets will have the second-best record in the West.

    They'll be the 4th seed, though.
     
    #32 KellyDwyer, Oct 19, 2005
    Last edited: Oct 19, 2005
  13. Nero

    Nero Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    6,447
    Likes Received:
    1,429
    I am just wondering why everyone seems to think it is a foregone conclusion that the Spurs are going to win the Division. Yeah, they are good, but now we are just as good, I think. I believe it will be a real shootout this year in the Division between us and the Spurs.

    Let's put THEM in 4th place for a change!
     
  14. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,598
    Likes Received:
    35,723
    I think SI's predictions are pretty good. I think the Rockets have perhaps the 2nd best team in the West but with the "seeding structure" will fall behind division champs Suns and Nuggets. I think the Nuggets will win their division but I am not sold on the Suns winning theirs. I think the Kings will challenge.

    If the Rockets get the 4th seed (or even 5th) they will have to face the Spurs (1 seed) in the 2nd round and that's tough. The only way to get away from them is to drop to the 6th seed! It sucks that the 2nd/3rd seeded teams which could be worse than the Rockets record wise get the free ride in the 2nd round. They really should just "re-seed" after the first round.
     
  15. hotballa

    hotballa Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,521
    Likes Received:
    316
    looks about right to me. I think they're reaching with the Suns pick though
     
  16. NewYorker

    NewYorker Ghost of Clutch Fans

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2002
    Messages:
    6,130
    Likes Received:
    41
    What's wrong is that you can have the second best record in the conference and end up the number four seed. That is pure stupidity.

    Before at least, it didn't matter if you got the number three seed with the second best record - you still played the same team and home court advantage was determined by record - so it made no difference!
     
  17. hotballa

    hotballa Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,521
    Likes Received:
    316
    It is a bit stupid since you play the same amount of games against Conference opponents as everyone else in it does. I can understand if its like baseball with the staggered schedule, but not basketball
     
  18. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,887
    Likes Received:
    12,980
    Amen, bro'.

    The 3 division winners should be guaranteed a playoff spot, but not a guarantee of the top 3 playoff seeds.

    Then, we could have (for example):

    1) San Antonio; 2) Houston; 3) Sacramento; 4) Dallas; 5) Denver

    1) Indiana; 2) Detroit; 3) Miami; 4) Cleveland; 5) New Jersey
     
  19. Cire

    Cire Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think it is total crap, just wrong in parts. Put more options in your poll.

    The Suns will not do as well this year. They lost some major components.

    The Spurs could flounder with the injury bug. It seems like Timmy has more and more injuries every year.

    Denver is just overrated.

    And, I cannot see Memphis making the playoffs after their fire sale.
     
  20. RocksMillenium

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2000
    Messages:
    10,018
    Likes Received:
    508
    Unless you can see into the future nothing is a given. Injuries can happen, teams can get hot, teams can perform better then expected, teams can perform worse then expected, etc., etc.
     

Share This Page