1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Should The Rockets go after Andray Blatche?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by GreatOne1978, Jun 20, 2012.

  1. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,993
    Likes Received:
    39,475
    Nope, you can not amnesty someone acquired in a trade, the only people you can amnesty were the ones with a contract that were on your team when the CBA was signed.

    Scola, Lowry, Kmart to name 3.

    DD
     
  2. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,725
    Likes Received:
    22,486
    If they wanted to get rid of Blatche just to get rid of him they would have amnestied him rather than giving up # 3. The Rockets would have to involve other players of value in that deal to make it worthwhile for the Wiz.
     
  3. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,725
    Likes Received:
    22,486
    Months ago i mentioned several times to watch out for Washington as a top pick trade partner to use the Rockets in aquiring pieces to put around John Wall, and take on the salary of Rashard Lewis with their top pick.

    However yesterday happend with Washington aquired surrounding pieces to go along with Wall, Nene, Crawford, etc. and they moved Lewis in the deal as well.

    That threw my hopes out the window right there.
     
  4. Thefabman

    Thefabman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,980
    Likes Received:
    1,577
    My face when this thread

    [​IMG]
     
  5. BEARCLAW

    BEARCLAW Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2012
    Messages:
    200
    Likes Received:
    6
    I assume that Washington used their amnesty already. If not, why would they trade the #3 to get rid of this guy?
     
  6. haoafu

    haoafu Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    56
    The way they are adding salaries, I think it's in their best interest to save over 20 million dollars by this trade. They can then save the amnesty for Nene's long term huge contract in case Nene doesn't perform up to standard later.
     
  7. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,725
    Likes Received:
    22,486
    They have not used it. When a media member asked Grunfeld last season about Blatche long term stay with the team he alluded to Blathe still being someone they think can turn it around in the future.

    Meaning, they dont see the point of amnestying him when they still owe him that much money, when they can just ask him to stay away from the team for the rest of the season and hope that he comes back to training camp next year with a new attitude and a Jenny Craig diet.

    They did not need the salary cap space in the past, and they did not want to give up a potential game changer pick in this years draft just to get rid of his salary. NOBODY would give the Wizards an asset for Blatche, its quite the opposite. In the future, they know they have the amnesty in their back pocket if they need the cap space to re-sign Wall or go after a free agent.
     
  8. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,725
    Likes Received:
    22,486
    More than likely they are done adding veterans to surround John Wall for now. If they still feel the need to bring in another veteran then it better be a good one. It really just depends on how high they are on the likes of Martin, or Scola.

    Those are the only two players they would need to shed salary to aquire from the Rockets. And are either of those two players good enough to command the #3 pick? I personally dont think so. If I was Grunfeld I would take my chances at going after Ray Allen in free agency or look at a trade with another team that has a high calliber wing player.
     
  9. alverwi

    alverwi Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    28
    That is hilarious.
     
  10. haoafu

    haoafu Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    56
    I'm talking about Dlembert+#16+fillers for Blatche+#3. I think it saves Wizards over 20 million dollars(in next 3 years) without using amnesty( which is valuable for flexibility). They can then buyout Dalembert for less than 2 million.

    Then they may have more cap space to sign other players. Or if Nene doesn't perform down the road, they still have the amnesty available. Imagine if Nene perform poorly(or injured like Amare) with his huge long contract, There's no way they can get rid of it and keep Wall happy without amnesty option available.
     
  11. alverwi

    alverwi Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    28
    Before clicking on this thread, I thought that it was another one of RealContender's ideas.
     
  12. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,725
    Likes Received:
    22,486
    This does nothing for them on the basketball court. With their rotation they have going into next year Dalembert would be the 3rd or 4th big in their rotation. Is that worth giving up the #3 pick in the draft for?

    Now, I will entertain the though of "IF they NEED the Salary Cap Space" when and if that is a reality. Right now, they do not need the salary cap space even with the additions of Okafor/Ariza.

    If they needed to go deep into their pockets to aquire a superstar wing player for that #3 pick then I have no doubt they would make the deal Blatche + #3 pick for X player. Dalembert, Scola, and Martin would give them quality depth, but they already have that now assuming Nene/Okafur/Ariza are the pieces they thought would do the trick.

    Another scenario is when they need to extend Wall. I assume thats when they will try to move Blatche or simply use their amnesty clause next Summer on him. Right now, I just dont see their NEED to trade their golden draft pick that they have tanked so hard and long for just to get another role player on their team and get some salary cap relief that they really dont need.

    Sorry, I just dont see a deal anymore now that they made the Ariza/Okafor deal.
     
  13. BEARCLAW

    BEARCLAW Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2012
    Messages:
    200
    Likes Received:
    6
    That might be okay as long as we don't keep Blatche.

    If they do get the 3rd pick, I wonder if they select that Drummond kid? If not him then who? :confused:
     
  14. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    37,270
    Likes Received:
    13,733
    If he came at the right price and we had the right coach and players around him yes. Unfortunately we don't. San Antonio will probably get him and turn him into another weapon.
     
  15. Yung-T

    Yung-T Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    24,403
    Likes Received:
    7,053
    Heard he worked out twice a day for basically the whole season and is fully committed to playing basketball again. He is a good person and seems to be dedicated now, I think he could turn his career around.
     
  16. haoafu

    haoafu Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    56
    Agree on most, but I don't think Blatche + #3 pick will get them a superstar or allstar wing. Even #3 alone may not be enough.

    Sounds like nothing will happen soon, and I agree it depends a lot on their followup moves.
     
  17. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,725
    Likes Received:
    22,486
    Your right that it probably wont get them a superstar. But #3 pick (gold in trades) is crazy value for a player like Dalembert, Scola, or Martin when all three of those players wouldn't necessarily be clear upgrades to likes of Okafor/Nene/ Crawford , etc. The purpose of the trade would be giving the Wizard bulk starters to fill in around Wall and make the team competitive this next year to keep him there long term.

    The #3 pick would have been a good tradeoff if the Rockets were able to make a move like

    Lewis or Blatche, + #3 for Scola, Martin, Dalembert #14th

    Before the trade that happened yesterday. Now it just wouldn't make sense. Trust me, I have been coveting that pick for weeks. Yesterday when that trade happened I was a bit let down.
     
  18. haoafu

    haoafu Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    56
    Well, things happen.

    I want the #3 for MKG. But if the rumor of MJ taking Barnes at #2 is true, Wizards with the recent trade may take Beal #3. I have a feeling Cavs can't let Robinson slip at #4. That means MKG maybe available around#6, which is right where Lowry's trade value stays...
     
  19. GreatOne1978

    GreatOne1978 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    2,874
    Likes Received:
    435
    And this guy can actually play center! Put a claim on him in the Waiver wire once he gets amnestied and get him! Very underrated
     
  20. Dat Dude

    Dat Dude Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    879
    Likes Received:
    57
    How about no!
     

Share This Page