See even the premise of this post is stupid. If one can't read english, why respond asking one to learn english...you always dig yourself a hole. Anyways, that part was obvious, your sauces (idk other than a screenshot post) say he didn't while others say he did. I've heard that he was on both ends of the extreme. Continue to carry on with your screenshot sauces though. Regardless of whether he brought himself to or not he supported Trump, arguing beyond that is stupid.
I was just making sure that the Da Dakota assertation that he was pro trump was corrected. I agree that the scoreboard is useless.
He was an alt righter. Which is nutjob in and of itself. Alt anything people are all over the map on issues.... DD
I agree on your second point but alt-righters usually don't support democratic candidates with such fervor.
It's crazy that they are even trying to deny it...I mean, I know it shatters their narrative, but the own guy's words are pretty conclusive.
I think it's important we realize that the "alt-righters" and the Bernie bros are really just 2 sides of the same coin and they both are extremist nutjobs.
This damage control and now a double post. Someone is cracking. I remember a few pages ago people on the right were talking about how we could improve the discourse, I guess they didn't envision LosPollosRetardaros coming in.
It's telling how you couldn't bring yourself to quote the last couple of words...because what it illustrates is incredibly clear..and it happens time and time again. You could have just quoted it and ignored it, but the fact that you dug yourself a deeper hole shows how incredibly insecure you were with it. I don't know why you rage post like you do, the buthurt is always palpable, but I don't mind continuing. People used to leave rep comments making fun of you so there was always a good laugh there as well.
It's simple just read it's easy to understand you just don't want to except the fact the right have become bolder in the acts of ethic division
The only thing I ever remember about your posts is you typically just randomly show up in threads to add nothing and insult people, and you bring up how people used to agree with you years ago.
This is just not true, Bernie is not a radical at all, he is more of a socialist, and progressive but he is far from radicalized. DD
He uses inflammatory rhetoric but that obviously does not make him responsible. The radicalized Bernie People however have shown they are very prone to violence.
Classic tryhard or your usual projection. "That creep just catalogues posts" is what one of the comments said on my rep page. The creep part definitely checks out. I don't know what you're referring to , but like your previous posts, or history of posts I should say---the lack of sense/substance isn't surprising. Cheer up Waggy. I'm not saying you get owned by me, but you have a history of being dragged by a leash on this forum...
Actually he doesn't use rhetoric at all, he talks about his ideas - rhetoric is what you see Trump doing... DD
Why are you defending Bernie so hard? No one is even going after him here, just his nutjob sect of followers who shot up our congress and stabbed people. Bernie did the right thing in revealing the guy worked on his campaign and disavowing. Now I hope he goes further in the coming days. And obviously he uses rhetoric.
Portland dude fell in love with Bernie for like 6 months... but he fell harder for The Donald once his Bernie phase passed. One of his tweets is something like, "If Trump is the next Hitler, I'm going to join his SS." Crazy **** like that. If you pick only the Bernie period, he was a giant nut for Bernie. But before and after he was white nationalist, and right wing. There is a fairly well documented misinformation campaign, however, by people who are known to engage in that sort of thing, to scrub the Trump love from the record and pretend that the Bernie period comprised his whole life. If you only read right wing sources you'd never know about his abiding love for Trump. As a result, don't get too upset at the people who buy the lifetime Bernie Sanders follower narrative. They've just been bamboozled and don't know it. The Bernie freakout, which lasted about 6 months, is the anomaly. Not the norm. It did exist, but he spent far more of his life hanging around with the hardcore white nationalist types. They would be right wing types, but a crazy racist nationalist subset of extreme right wingers - the kind that get swastika and rebel flag tattoos on their faces - like equating Bernie Sanders and Mao since "they are both leftists". One is off the deep end, the other not quite so much. Mostly he was just kind of crazy, and it looks to me like he was attracted to extremes, and he found that with really different people at different times.
There's no need to defend anything. Bernie never choke slammed a reporter or encouraged people to fist fight or talked about how the 2nd amendment folks could take care of judges or pretended he didn't know who David Duke was or talked about loving war or joked about killing reporters. All politicians use inflammatory rhetoric, only Republicans use violent rhetoric and get a pass for it. Republicans are infamous for posting the tree of liberty quote any time they don't like something. This type of targeting politicians for violence is a central tenet of conservatism. There's probably not a wingnut alive that doesn't know that quote, Anyway, I expect to see much more of this.
