I can't imagine Morey considers any trade with Indy that doesn't involve Danny Granger. Trading Shane for Foster wouldn't really make sense for the long term for Houston(because of Foster's age, ceiling, and production) and in the short term I'm sure he isn't THAT much better than Chuck Hayes in terms of production. Besides, we trade Battier and then who do we have to play the 2 or 3 depending on where you start Ariza? It's one thing if trading Shane got you an overall more productive player but I don't think Foster is that guy. And here is the real litmus test of an awful trade proposal - what does Indy get out of the deal? They have Granger, Dunleavy, Brandon Rush, and Marquis Daniels who all play that 2/3 spot. What use would they possibly have for Shane on that roster? He makes too much money to share minute with those other guys. Plus Indy has a bunch of bigs who hustle well enough but have no offensive game. Would you want Shane out there playing with Troy Murphy and Hibbert/Rasho? Remember, if it's something that you could post on the other team's forum and be unquestionably panned for, it's probably not worth posting here and CERTAINLY not worth it's own thread.
It's not as bad as the thread that suggested we trade for Tyson Chandler and move him to SG but it is pretty damn bad.
Nope Indiana has been in the media for being too white why would they trade a white player for a black player.
So would that be Eighth Circle guarded by Geryon full of seducers, false prophets, hypocrites, fraudulent advisers, sowers of discord, falsifiers, & impersonators?
