1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

RUMOR : Spanoulis Offered Contract by the Rockets

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Amel, Jul 17, 2006.

  1. Matt78777

    Matt78777 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    1,240
    Logistically, wouldn't it be a bit much to sign vspan and banks? that would give us 4 point guards (assuming JL3 does sign with us) not including Head or Sura. Unless the Rockets really think Vspan is ready and can play a little 2, I don't see us signing spanoulis and banks.

    While spanoulis might be the sexier prospect, I think I'm leaning toward banks, if only because he complements alston better. Alston would be our playmaker, and Banks would be our defensive stopper. Too bad neither can shoot though.
     
  2. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    I agree, but Jasikevicius was more mature and far more accomplished, and even he can't deliver on his 4 mil year price tag it took to bring him to the US. That is why I think anything more than 2 mil, let alone 3 mil, in a multi-year deal, is outragous for VSpan.

    I would not be surprised if Indy would trade Jasikevicius to us for free (use the TE) just to clear their books. They don't have great guards, and he is a 3rd stringer for them either at the 1 or 2 (assuming they bring back F. Jones). I think this would be smarter than bringing in VSpan with anything near half an MLE contract.
     
  3. m_cable

    m_cable Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    9,455
    Likes Received:
    73
    Well I don't see how that has relevance, since the "cost" of a lotto pick is much moreso in the draft position than in the salary. And basically any first rounder that pans out even a bit is on a relatively underpaid contract. Whether V-span has as much chance to pan out as a lottery pick is pretty much immaterial.

    You look at our MLE and what's left on the market and it's clear that there isn't anyone worth a full MLE. So we can pretty much still target the players we're looking at (like banks) even if we spring for V-Span. And we might as well bring him over this year, because you never know when the opportunity cost to split the MLE for him will be as small as this year. Next year when free agency is supposed to be much stronger, you'd want to keep your full MLE in tact, and who knows after that. So in a now or much later scenario, I'd rather have V-Span now.
     
  4. ymc

    ymc Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,969
    Likes Received:
    36
    Maybe he wants to win the Euroleague? They only went to Final Four last year. He may also want to be on the first-team of Euroleague.

    By the way, had he ever played against USA team? We knew Manu and Yao were good because they played well against Team USA.
     
  5. ymc

    ymc Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,969
    Likes Received:
    36
    Oops. They were eliminated by TAU CerĂ¡mica at Elite Eight last yr.
     
  6. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    I think the salary comparison with rooks is relevant. The NBA lowered the years on rook contracts/increased the team option because too many rook contracts were not panning out at all and saddling teams with long term contracts a lot more than the player's value. Yes some teams hit big time, rooks who are heavy producers the length of those contract, but most of mid to late 1st rounders never do squat and are drains (think Reece Gaines, but this is the norm more than the exception).

    I just think say anything more than say a 2 year 5 mil contract is a bad bet for a guy who has a low chance to be an NBA player. I am pretty sure better bets will come along, guys like Banks and Fred Jones IMO would be much better bets at 2 year full MLE contracts (say 2/11 mil). I'd rather wait out all of FA for players to be released or resigned (or find a market lower than expected--possibly with Banks or Jones or Ariza, etc) than committ early to VSpan.
     
  7. UTweezer

    UTweezer Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,888
    Likes Received:
    41
    I've watched banks play on a few occasions and I agree. He can't shoot the 3 ball, shooting is very erratic, turnover prone, undersized, and doesn't seem have a very good basketball IQ.

    poor man's steve franchise imo
     
  8. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    You'd take Jasikevicius for $4MM/year and wouldn't want Spanoulis for $2MM/year? That's the rumor. (3 years - $6MM) I understand wanting to keep the MLE, but not much is left for the MLE. I'd much rather take Spanoulis and his potential than Marcus Banks who I know isn't worth much.
     
  9. Rockets Dynasty

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,179
    Likes Received:
    0
    From the 3 playoff games I saw on NBATV last year of Spanoulis, he looks considerably better than Marcus Banks except in one category defense against point guards, in which Banks is quite good (particularly ball pressure).

    I would say Morey/Dawson/Lindsey would all want Spanoulis more.

    JVG would want Banks more.

    That in itself should tell anyone that has been watching the Rockets who the better talent is.

    A lot of people are comparing him to Manu, but in those 3 games he looked a lot closer to Nash (without as good a shot).
     
  10. Rockets Dynasty

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,179
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah and I guess this means the Rockets think Spanoulis is already better than Bogans, because he got apparently 3 years $6 million and Houston would not match it, but then they offer it to Spanoulis instead.
     
  11. geeimsobored

    geeimsobored Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    3,389
    Bogans has very little upside. What you see is what you get from him. Not to mention we got Snyder for less money and he has plenty of room to improve and has much more athleticism. Letting Bogans go was a good move in the grand scheme of things.
     
  12. crash5179

    crash5179 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2000
    Messages:
    16,468
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    According to reports the Rockets have offered VSpan a 3 year deal for 6 million. That is about what Ginobli got when he signed with the Spurs as a rookie so I believe the numbers are probably about right.

    I have no real clue what Banks is asking but I have a hard time believing that he will get 4 million next season. He looks to have some potential but if he wants 4 a year then I say to him...good luck finding someone to give you that but I hope its not the Rockets.
     
  13. rhino17

    rhino17 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    18,025
    Likes Received:
    4,436

    The Rockets have to offer him that size of a contract because he could get more money in europe than the NBA minimum salary
     
  14. xlr817

    xlr817 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2002
    Messages:
    790
    Likes Received:
    72

    I think it was his BRICKthru performance that helped sealed his fate last year! ;)
     
  15. Amel

    Amel Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    10,641
    Likes Received:
    5,726
    Steve Nash 32 years old

    Vassilli Spanoulis 24 years old

    Hopefully we keep him with Yao and Tmac for another 5 years :D
     
  16. Amel

    Amel Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    10,641
    Likes Received:
    5,726
    New Article on Vassili Spanoulis!

    now they are talking about 4.5 million..

    here is the link

    GREEK SPORTS WEBSITE
     
  17. DraftBoy10

    DraftBoy10 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    2,089
    Likes Received:
    42
    If Vassilis is willing to come here that's very intriguing. However, if we are the one's pushing too hard as they are just "ears" and money-driven then I'd use Vassilis as trade bait. Honestly, if he doesn't come here this off-season, probably latest next off-season, we know he's going to virtually amount to absolutely nothing. He's either too scared to come here or to successful in Europe, so why does he need the change?

    If either are the case, forget Vassilis. We can't let a "scared" player on the team, Van Gundy would suck the confidence right out of him. If he's too successful and why change? It simply means he's selfish and not competition-driven.
     
  18. xlr817

    xlr817 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2002
    Messages:
    790
    Likes Received:
    72
    :D I like it when they said "we are we". ;)
     
  19. Doctor Robert

    Doctor Robert Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 1999
    Messages:
    3,304
    Likes Received:
    863
    If he makes 500,000 euros for the next 2 years and resigns for 700,000 euros, that would mean over the course of the next 3 years in Europe, he would make approximately $2.1 million. He should jump if they are offering him $4.5 million for the next 3 years, with the opportunity to prove himself and make more after that, rather than be tied up for 700,000 euros a year.

    How does that compare to other #50 picks?
     
  20. Amel

    Amel Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    10,641
    Likes Received:
    5,726
    According to a member from the Panathinaikos Website, Vassili Spanoulis announced tonight to a greek journalist that his chances to play for the Houston Rockets are 70% to 80%!!

    LOOKS LIKE A DONE DEAL!!!

    Yeaaa!
     

Share This Page