1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Roster spots.

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by sherry02, Aug 22, 2005.

Tags:
  1. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390
    I admit it's a gamble but look what you're giving up. Ward ain't gonna play. He's just wasted dollars. And Wesley ain't no spring chicken either, plus the dude is only 6 foot. Yes, it's a risk, but $5 million or so for 3 years with only one or two guaranteed can't be too much worse than where we are at now. In a year, he could effectively be an expiring contract that could be peddled off. And if there's a chemistry issue, well just bench his Molly Poppins doo. Remember, what we are giving up to get him and the other pieces we have added. With the addition of Derek Anderson, I see less need for a player like Mike James. Or at the very least Moochie, Ward, and Vin are going to be useless to us this year. Remember Minny was willing to give the guy $21 million. If we give him $10 million with a front loaded deal that has only 2 guaranteed years, we can see what we could get out of him and then trade him away as an expiring deal next year, the same as if any of our expirings now. And besides that we will still have expirings to move at the trade deadline this year to make an upgrade.

    As far as PG, it would be nice to get a pure PG to add to this team. But I don't think they are out there. I think if there were a deal to be made for a pure PG that can pass and shoot it, it would have already been done. We'll have to see what falls out of the tree come the deadline. In the meantime, we might as well take a shot at Spree. What could it really hurt if you think about it?
     
  2. droxford

    droxford Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2001
    Messages:
    10,598
    Likes Received:
    2,131
    Didn't we already sign Luther Head? that puts us over the limit at 16 players:

    1. Vin Baker (he'll be inactive)
    2. Jon Barry
    3. Ryan Bowen
    4. Luther Head
    5. Juwan Howard
    6. Mike James
    7. Tracy McGrady
    8. Dikembe Mutombo
    9. Moochie Norris (he'll be inactive)
    10. Bob Sura
    11. Stromile Swift
    12. Charlie Ward (he'll be inactive
    13. David Wesley
    14. Yao Ming
    15. Derek Anderson
    16. Luther Head

    doesn't look promising for:

    17. Lonnie Baxter
    18. Glover

    Not only do we not have enough room for those two guys, we have to shave our roster by one guy.

    ... and... DAMN, WE HAVE A GOOD TEAM!!!!
     
  3. Mr Boo

    Mr Boo Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2003
    Messages:
    917
    Likes Received:
    2
    Drox, you have LH listed twice.

    So the new list would look like this:

    1. Vin Baker (he'll be inactive)
    2. Jon Barry
    3. Ryan Bowen
    4. Luther Head
    5. Juwan Howard
    6. Mike James
    7. Tracy McGrady
    8. Dikembe Mutombo
    9. Moochie Norris (he'll be inactive)
    10. Bob Sura
    11. Stromile Swift
    12. Charlie Ward (he'll be inactive
    13. David Wesley
    14. Yao Ming
    15. Derek Anderson
     
  4. HoRockets

    HoRockets Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    827
    Likes Received:
    0
    So you're saying that if we give them Head, they'll give us Head back? :confused: :D
     
  5. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390

    Ho,

    You're supposed to be quicker than that.
     
  6. Freik

    Freik Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    993
    Likes Received:
    34

    Only reason i counted him was that he was on the roster, i had no idea what happened to him. Just posted what i read there. Someone already cleared up that he was gone.
     
  7. GBRocket

    GBRocket Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    1,053
    Likes Received:
    133
    Why would you put 3 players on the inactive list and only suit up 11 players for a game? I mean I know they suck, but there is no point in only suiting up 11 and putting 3 guys on the inactive list if all of them are healthy.
     
  8. krocket

    krocket Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2003
    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    5
    How good is DA at the point?
    Does he have experience there?
    Is he a Sura type PG?
    If yes to these questions then don't Wesley and James become redundant? Can we trade Bowen yet? What about Wesley/James + Bowen for DerMarr Johnson signed? A big swingman that backs up TMac or starts at '2'. Young, athletic, good 3-ptr, and (according to 82games.com) number six of all '2' guards in defense.
     
  9. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    DA can play the point, Sura can play the point, but those may not be their best positions. James however is our most athletic and best shooting point--by far the best option to slow a super quick one going off on us. DW I would say is more redundent. But he still is a fine spot up shooter, solid defender and good role player. I doubt you can get a player who will be more valuable to us than Wesley by trading Wesley. Maybe if he looks real old/sluggish we trade him before the deadline and mail him his ring in June, but he may stick as well.

    As for Dermarr, if we were going after him we would have used our LLE we gave to DA. He would have been a reasonable choice--more upside but more risk than DA, but is out of the picture now. Denver isn't going to trade him to us for any reasonable some now that we have no leverage (could only offer the vet min).

    Further Bowen as a signed free agent I think can't be traded until December 15th.
     
  10. MrRolo

    MrRolo Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Messages:
    1,248
    Likes Received:
    0
    Does anyone know if the minimum of 5-games inactive for a player that is on the inactive list rule still aplies under the new C.B.A.?

    Also, i think the roster we have now is the roster we will have until february :cool:
     

Share This Page