1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Ron Paul Responds to TSA: Introduces 'American Traveler Dignity Act'

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by rtsy, Nov 17, 2010.

  1. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,583
    Likes Received:
    9,097
    i dont get how this statement jibes w/ these...

     
  2. Rashmon

    Rashmon Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2000
    Messages:
    21,198
    Likes Received:
    18,200
    I'm not sure what you're misunderstanding. It's pretty clear.

    Civil disobedience is a tool used for positive change. I support it. Sometimes civil disobedience is a tool used for pure self interest.

    People practicing civil disobedience often get arrested for it. Until the law/policy prompting the civil disobedience is no longer in effect, disagreeing with the law does not give you the right to disobey it without repercussion.

    In the case of the video with the lady, her refusal to cooperate got her arrested. I had no problem with her being arrested.

    If someone is in line at an airport with a mechanical metal box attached to their chest, I would hope that airport security would insure it was nothing of danger.
     
  3. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,583
    Likes Received:
    9,097
    i agree that there are repercussions to disobeying laws, even ones you feel are unjust. i dont think anyone would argue otherwise.

    it just seems like you are trying to have it both ways when you claim you support acts of civil disobedience but you say you have no sympathy for this woman, who was a rape victim, and you think she is "foolish" and that its funny that the cops knocked her to the ground and arrested her b/c she did not want her breasts felt. that does not sound like the attitude of someone who is sympathetic to acts of civil disobedience.

    and you think they need to feel her breasts in order to do this? if sexually molesting innocent americans is what it takes to make yall feel safe than "the terrorists" have already won.
     
  4. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    I'd be happy if they could figure out how to stop guns from going through in carry-on and quit wasting our time with pointless security theater that accomplishes nothing while degrading everyone... But hey, I guess I'm just old-fashioned like that.
     
    1 person likes this.
  5. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,811
    Likes Received:
    5,217
    Glocks rock!, btw going down this road, why not use the proven profiling method? ...It works, ask Israel...
     
  6. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,583
    Likes Received:
    9,097
    exactly - as i pointed out many times in this thread, if they simply followed procedures already inplace and utilized the tools already at their disposal 9/11 would not have happened and the underwear bomber would have never even made it past the ticket counter (where he paid cash for a 1 way ticket and didnt even have a passport, btw).

    but the response by the government (republican or democrat) is not to ensure that in the future they do their job properly - instead, we see a continual increase in the police state and an erosion of our freedoms...essentially doing exactly what "the terrorists" wanted us to do.
     
  7. rtsy

    rtsy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    50
    Report: U.S. regrets pat-down of India's ambassador

    Sari-clad diplomat pulled from Miss. airport line for extra screening

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40614732/ns/us_news-airliner_security/#

    [​IMG]

    The U.S. State Department says it regrets the pat-down of India's ambassador Meera Shankar last week at a Mississippi airport, according to a report in an Indian newspaper.

    The security check spurred by the ambassador wearing a sari has created an uproar, with India objecting to what U.S. officials say was a by-the-book procedure that does not exempt diplomats.

    The New Delhi-based Economic Times on Saturday quoted Indian embassy spokesperson Virendar Paul saying, "The U.S. Department of State has reached out to the ambassador and has regretted what all happened. The Embassy is in touch with the State Department on this issue."

    On Thursday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the incident is being examined.

    "We obviously are concerned about it," Clinton said. "We will be looking into it and trying to determine both what happened and what we could do to prevent such incidents in the future."

    A female Transportation Security Administration agent patted down Shankar when she was pulled out of line at the Jackson, Miss., airport. She was singled out for additional screening because of her apparel, officials said.

    State officials, who had invited Shankar to Mississippi State University to give a speech and participate in a conference, said afterward they were embarrassed over Shankar's treatment.

    Indian Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna said it was the second time the ambassador had been singled out for a pat-down in the past three months.

    "This is unacceptable to India and we are going to take it up with the U.S. government and I hope things could be resolved so that such unpleasant incidents do not recur," Krishna told journalists, according to the Hindu newspaper.

    The U.S. State Department said diplomats are subject to the same basic screening as other passengers at U.S. airports.

    Following attempted attacks, including last year's attempt to blow up a flight to Detroit by a passenger with a bomb hidden in his clothes, U.S. authorities have deployed hundreds of full-body scanners and two months ago began doing more physical pat-downs that many travelers find invasive.

    Asked about the incident involving Shankar, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said she had looked into the matter and concluded that "it was by the book."

    "It was a pat-down that followed our procedures, and I think it was appropriate under the circumstances," Napolitano said.

    Protocols in which U.S. authorities are notified before passengers with special credentials get to airports can expedite their security checks, she said.

    "In this particular instance, that protocol had not been utilized," Napolitano said. "I think what was done by the ... officer was done appropriately and by the book."
     
  8. rtsy

    rtsy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    50
    TSA Worker Avoids Prison After Stealing Travelers’ Laptops

    http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/20...oids-prison-after-stealing-travelers-laptops/

    PHILADELPHIA (CBS) – A 37-year-old former Transportation Security Administration officer has been sentenced to three years’ probation for stealing laptop computers from passengers’ luggage at Philadelphia International Airport.

    Federal prosecutor Arlene Fisk says defendant Troy Davis, upset about a demotion and lost pay, admitted stealing five laptops and a Sony Playstation.

    Fisk says Davis actually used the surveillance equipment for his own greedy purpose.

    “He put the luggage through special machines to see whether there was any explosives or anything of concern in the luggage,” she told KYW Newsradio. “When he saw that there was something of value in the luggage, he took out the computers or the games.”

    Judge C. Darnell Jones says he considered the defendant’s military service — the US Navy veteran served in Operation Desert Shield, Operation Desert Storm, and in Somalia. And Davis is still recovering from injuries from a near-fatal car wreck a year ago.

    “Quite frankly,” Judge Jones told the defendant, “that is what kept you out of jail, because I was determined to put you there. As I indicated before, if you violate this court’s probation, I can assure you this will not keep you out.”
     
  9. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,055
    Likes Received:
    15,229
    Why do we do that? We give them diplomatic immunity anyway. You'd think we'd take the security risk and let them walk through.
     
  10. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    Jesse Ventura sues the TSA and DHS after he is repeatedly groped courtesy of his hip-replacement surgery.
     
  11. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,898
    Likes Received:
    39,878
    Rep for The Body!
     
  12. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    22,751
    Likes Received:
    12,491
    I second that
     
  13. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,167
    Likes Received:
    48,334
    That was reported on the local news here. Keep in mind though that what Ventura is asking for is not an all out repeal of the TSA regulations but a special exemption for himself as a former Navy SEAL, frequent traveller and governor. Also the local news played a clip of Gov. Ventura right after 9/11 giving a speech saying that the public needs to put up with more inconvenience to improve safety.
     
  14. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,583
    Likes Received:
    9,097
    although he has pointed out the absurdity of a former governor, navy seal and famous actor/entertainer having to prove he is not a terrorist, he is not asking for a special exemption b/c of those things - it seems to have more to do w/ his artificial hip and the scrutiny he has to go through over it everytime he flys. and the article specifically says he is suing b/c he was "exposed him to humiliation and degradation through unwanted touching, gripping and rubbing of the intimate areas of his body."

    and he isnt asking for a special exemption solely for himself - if anything, he is trying to get an exemption for all handicapped people so they can try to maintain their dignity. be it people w/ fake hips, people in wheelchairs, breast cancer survivors w/ prosthetic breasts and people w/ colostomy bags.

    but based on the article it looks like he is directly challenging the constitutionality of the TSA groping and naked body scanning. i would love to see this turn into some kind of class-action suit!

    im going to bet he didnt have naked body scanning and sexually molesting people who want to fly in mind when he made those comments.

    the TSA already settled w/ the woman in corpus who had her breasts exposed by the TSA and then had a bunch of those pervs make inappropriate comments to her and joke about it. if ventura is successful it will really kick open the door to more people suing, which would be awesome!
     
  15. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    22,751
    Likes Received:
    12,491

    Standing in line a little longer and taking off your shoes is inconvenient. Getting groped is more than being inconvenienced.
     
  16. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
  17. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    Wil Wheaton on his recent groping:

     
  18. Rashmon

    Rashmon Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2000
    Messages:
    21,198
    Likes Received:
    18,200
    [​IMG]
    "I applaud the TSA."
     
    1 person likes this.
  19. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    This is just ****ing gross. I'm flabbergasted a TSA employee would even be willing to do this. Perverts.

    Ky. parents: TSA frisked our 6-year-old daughter

    BOWLING GREEN, Ky. – A Kentucky couple wants the TSA to change how it screens children after their 6-year-old daughter was frisked at the New Orleans airport.

    Selena Drexel told ABC's "Good Morning America" Wednesday the family was returning home from a vacation earlier this month when their daughter Anna was selected for a pat-down.

    The couple posted a video of the search on YouTube.

    The girl's father, Todd Drexel, says Anna was confused by the search and started crying afterward because she thought she'd done something wrong.

    Selena Drexel says such searches are inappropriate for children because they're usually told not to let adults touch them in sensitive areas.

    In a statement, the Transportation Security Administration says the officer followed proper procedure but that the agency is reviewing its screening policies.
     
  20. dmc89

    dmc89 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    3,816
    Likes Received:
    255
    Desperate times. The bad guys can use 6-year-olds to transport things precisely because you wouldn't suspect them. Or octogenarians. Or people that look 'white'.

    It's a tit for tat that leads to serious curbs on freedom. I get annoyed when intelligent people think a bloated agency like the TSA with so many loopholes is actually keeping them safe, and that these new measures are necessary. Israel doesn't use scanners, nor should we.
     

Share This Page