Kerr molded an underperforming team from Mark Jackson and turned it into a dynasty. It's incredible that he is ranked lower than the others who have not achieved anything close to him. He could be number one or two although Spo has achieved a lot too.
Yes, it's unfortunate. I doubt that he can play much for the Houston Rockets. Landale will be working overtime.
I agree with your take but I think it's in the wrong thread? I think it should be in the Ime Udoka good coach thread where they have put a ranking of top 10 coaches.
Covington is a good depth guy but you kind of hope he can't steal any minutes from this forward rotation. He shouldn't be able to at this age.
ESPN Future Power Rankings Spoiler 30. Portland Trail Blazers | Previous ranking: 28 Players 27 | Management 29 | Money 11 | Market 24 | Draft 12 29. Detroit Pistons | Previous ranking: 25 Players 28 | Management 27 | Money 5 | Market 30 | Draft 13 28. Washington Wizards | Previous ranking: 30 Players 29 | Management 24 | Money 4 | Market 18 | Draft 6 27. Brooklyn Nets | Previous ranking: 22 Players 30 | Management 26 | Money 1 | Market 6 | Draft 2 26. Charlotte Hornets | Previous ranking: 29 Players 22 | Management 28 | Money 6 | Market 21 | Draft 8 25. Chicago Bulls | Previous ranking: 27 Players 25 | Management 30 | Money 9 | Market 11 | Draft 14 24. Utah Jazz | Previous ranking: 15 Players 26 | Management 17 | Money 8 | Market 28 | Draft 4 23. Atlanta Hawks | Previous ranking: 20 Players 23 | Management 23 | Money 12 | Market 13 | Draft 16 22. Toronto Raptors | Previous ranking: 24 Players 22 | Management 21 | Money 7 | Market 15 | Draft 7 21. Los Angeles Lakers | Previous ranking: 10 Players 19 | Management 25 | Money 20 | Market 2 | Draft 21 20. LA Clippers | Previous ranking: 14 Players 21 | Management 10 | Money 14 | Market 3 | Draft 26 19. Phoenix Suns | Previous ranking: 9 Players 12 | Management 22 | Money 29 | Market 7 | Draft 28 18. Sacramento Kings | Previous ranking: 11 Players 16 | Management 15 | Money 16 | Market 22 | Draft 20 17. Miami Heat | Previous ranking: 7 Players 20 | Management 3 | Money 23 | Market 5 | Draft 24 16. New Orleans Pelicans | Previous ranking: 17 Players 14 | Management 20 | Money 15 | Market 25 | Draft 9 15. Milwaukee Bucks | Previous ranking: 6 Players 9 | Management 16 | Money 26 | Market 17 | Draft 27 14. Indiana Pacers | Previous ranking: 21 Players 10 | Management 11 | Money 18 | Market 20 | Draft 19 13. Cleveland Cavaliers | Previous ranking: 12 Players 8 | Management 19 | Money 22 | Market 26 | Draft 25 12. Memphis Grizzlies | Previous ranking: 4 Players 11 | Management 18 | Money 10 | Market 30 | Draft 11 11. Orlando Magic | Previous ranking: 23 Players 13 | Management 14 | Money 17 | Market 14 | Draft 10 10. San Antonio Spurs | Previous ranking: 18 Players 18 | Management 13 | Money 3 | Market 19 | Draft 1 9. Golden State Warriors | Previous ranking: 5 Players 15 | Management 6 | Money 24 | Market 4 | Draft 17 8. Minnesota Timberwolves | Previous ranking: 19 Players 7 | Management 9 | Money 28 | Market 29 | Draft 29 7. Houston Rockets | Previous ranking: 26 Players 17 | Management 8 | Money 2 | Market 10 | Draft 5 After finishing with a 41-41 record following a 16-6 close to the regular season, Houston enjoyed a 19-spot improvement from last year -- by far the biggest jump in the league. Houston's first top-10 ranking since landing in the fourth spot five years ago was powered by top 10 rankings in each of the management, money, draft and market categories and a jump from 26th to 17th in the players category. -- Bontemps 6. Denver Nuggets | Previous ranking: 2 Players 6 | Management 12 | Money 27 | Market 16 | Draft 30 5. Dallas Mavericks | Previous ranking: 16 Players 4 | Management 7 | Money 19 | Market 9 | Draft 22 4. Philadelphia 76ers | Previous ranking: 13 Players 5 | Management T4 | Money 21 | Market 12 | Draft 15 3. New York Knicks | Previous ranking: 8 Players 3 | Management T4 | Money 25 | Market 1 | Draft 23 2. Boston Celtics | Previous ranking: 1 Players 1 | Management 2 | Money 30 | Market 8 | Draft 18 1. Oklahoma City Thunder | Previous ranking: 3 Players 2 | Management 1 | Money 3 | Market 27 | Draft 3 PLAYERS (worth 58.3% of score): Current players and their potential for the future, factoring in expected departures MANAGEMENT (worth 16.7% of score): Quality and stability of front office, ownership, coaching MONEY (worth 8.3% of score): Projected salary-cap situation; ability and willingness to exceed cap and pay luxury tax MARKET (worth 8.3% of score): Appeal to future acquisitions based on team quality, franchise reputation, city's desirability as a destination, market size, taxes, business and entertainment opportunities, arena quality, fans DRAFT (worth 8.3% of score): Future draft picks; draft positioning Players (58.3%) RANK TEAM RATING 1 Boston 91 2 Oklahoma City 88 3 New York 81 T-4 Dallas 79 T-4 Philadelphia 79 6 Denver 77 7 Minnesota 76 8 Cleveland 67 9 Milwaukee 66 10 Indiana 59 T-11 Memphis 58 T-11 Phoenix 58 T-13 Orlando 57 T-13 New Orleans 57 15 Golden State 53 T-16 Sacramento 52 T-16 Houston 52 18 San Antonio 49 19 Los Angeles Lakers 47 20 Miami 42 21 LA Clippers 40 22 Toronto 33 23 Atlanta 31 T-24 Charlotte 22 T-24 Chicago 22 26 Utah 19 27 Portland 17 28 Detroit 16 29 Washington 10 30 Brooklyn 2 Current players and potential for the future Management (16.7%) RANK TEAM RATING T-1 Oklahoma City 92 T-1 Boston 92 3 Miami 81 T-4 New York 80 T-4 Philadelphia 80 6 Golden State 71 7 Dallas 69 8 Houston 60 T-9 Minnesota 59 T-9 LA Clippers 59 11 Indiana 59 12 Denver 58 13 San Antonio 56 14 Orlando 55 15 Sacramento 53 16 Milwaukee 50 17 Utah 49 T-18 Memphis 48 T-18 Cleveland 48 20 New Orleans 47 21 Toronto 44 22 Phoenix 43 23 Atlanta 27 T-24 Washington 23 T-24 Los Angeles Lakers 23 26 Brooklyn 22 27 Detroit 14 28 Charlotte 10 29 Portland 8 30 Chicago 5 Quality/stability of front office, ownership, coaching Money (8.3%) RANK TEAM RATING 1 Brooklyn 98 2 Houston 88 3 San Antonio 86 4 Washington 79 5 Detroit 76 6 Charlotte 72 T-7 Toronto 70 T-7 Utah 70 9 Chicago 69 10 Memphis 62 11 Portland 55 12 Atlanta 52 T-13 Oklahoma City 51 T-13 LA Clippers 51 T-15 New Orleans 50 T-15 Sacramento 50 17 Orlando 48 T-18 Indiana 43 T-18 Dallas 43 20 Los Angeles Lakers 41 21 Philadelphia 39 T-22 Cleveland 36 T-22 Miami 36 T-22 Golden State 36 25 New York 34 26 Milwaukee 24 27 Denver 20 28 Minnesota 10 29 Phoenix 8 30 Boston 5 Projected salary-cap situation Draft (8.3%) RANK TEAM RATING 1 San Antonio 92 T-2 Brooklyn 90 T-2 Oklahoma City 90 4 Utah 84 5 Houston 75 T-6 Washington 71 T-6 Toronto 71 8 Charlotte 68 9 New Orleans 66 10 Orlando 63 T-11 Memphis 57 T-11 Portland 57 13 Detroit 55 14 Chicago 54 15 Philadelphia 53 16 Atlanta 51 17 Golden State 49 18 Boston 46 19 Indiana 45 20 Sacramento 42 21 Los Angeles Lakers 36 22 Dallas 33 23 New York 31 24 Miami 29 25 Cleveland 23 26 LA Clippers 17 T-27 Milwaukee 16 T-27 Phoenix 16 29 Minnesota 11 30 Denver 10 Future draft picks; draft positioning Market (8.3%) RANK TEAM RATING T-1 New York 94 T-1 Los Angeles Lakers 94 3 LA Clippers 87 4 Golden State 85 5 Miami 82 6 Brooklyn 79 7 Phoenix 75 T-8 Boston 63 T-8 Dallas 63 10 Houston 62 11 Chicago 59 12 Philadelphia 57 13 Atlanta 54 14 Orlando 49 15 Toronto 48 16 Denver 44 17 Milwaukee 41 T-18 Washington 39 T-18 San Antonio 39 T-20 Indiana 31 T-20 Charlotte 31 T-22 Sacramento 30 T-22 Memphis 30 24 Portland 28 T-25 New Orleans 26 T-25 Cleveland 26 27 Oklahoma City 25 28 Utah 23 29 Minnesota 20 30 Detroit 17 Appeal to future acquisitions