Robert Mueller, Former F.B.I. Director, Is Named Special Counsel for Russia Investigation

good breakdown of illegal spying of Trump campaign that was going on and Admiral Mike Rogers' attempts to stop it

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...equests-obamas-2016-doj-fbi-spying-operation/

 

Lol Fox Friends citing anonymous sources.

Call Sean Hannity.

 

Form a committee on it and be sure to put the right Republicans in charge, none of those deep state republicans!

*snickers

 

Oh my gosh, we are back to trump's story of being wiretapped...

 

lol...conservativetreehouse.com...you should really do some research about your news source. If you have done research about your news source and consider it reputable, you are a dupe.

If you randomly google to find "sources" that confirm your preconcieved conclusions, you are a duped troll.

 

tick tock, noose is tightening on the Deep State

 

You should read the about page, LOL.

 

Guy sure acts guilty and desperate.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/us/politics/trump-sessions-russia-mcgahn.html?_r=0


And why are some people so against finding the truth? Let's the investigation and inquiries conclude. What are you so afraid of? The Truth?

 

The carriers of 45's fetid nightslops have no answer for this, ever. None.

So we have to keep asking the question.

They imply a lauded conservative, Mueller, can't find truth. They imply a half-black jury is biased against truth. They ridiculously imply the most lying public figure of our lifetimes is to be trusted above anyone who dares mistrust him.

It is a bankrupt position, fed by an illogical, desperate fringe. No sense sugar-coating.

 

That's exactly the point. It is one of the craziest things I've seen. There hasn't been one example of Republican Mueller being biased and carrying out the investigation in an unprofessional manner.

Luckily, it looks like few outside of Trump's band of core followers is giving the bias talk any weight.

 

GOP Senators recommend charges in Russian probe

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/05/...iary-committee.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

against former British intelligence officer who wrote the Trump dossier.

 

Please tell me how again the US Justice Department goes about charging a British citizen again? And what would they charge him with?

 

Combine this with more investigations into the Clinton family and the House GOP pouring through Fusion GPS bank records to try to kick off criminal investigations along with firings/appointments being made in key positions relevant to investigating Trump and the RNC and we have a sense these dark times are, perhaps, about to get much darker. The RNC is complicit in leveraging law enforcement to shut down political enemies.

 

May the Beatles' gods forgive me...

 

This is gonna start off looking like the playbook used against Hillary Clinton: Use a bunch of show investigations to paint the opposition as just as, if not more, corrupt than you are. Play games of false equivalency and let team politics take it's course. But where it will likely end is an especially dark place for democracy. This is facism in action.

 

Kicking out all the RINOs in the FBI?

*snickers

 

I can't believe I'm finding this hard to believe, but I am. This is another terrible line to cross, and they have NO need to cross it. Ignorant, dangerous, dishonest.

 

This is a trap set by Grassley/Graham that the media (and clueless Dems like Blumenthal) doesn't seem to realize.

Grassley/Graham have not talked to Steele, but they have talked to Obama DoJ officials. And they have identified contradictions between Obama DoJ testimony to them, and Steele's recorded testimony to authorities.

Someone is lying, either the Obama DoJ or Steele.

By the media/Dems coming to the defense of the latter, they are indicting the former.

So who would have a motivation to lie in this instance, Steele, or the people responsible for obtaining the FISA warrant to spy on Trump's campaign?

The noose is tightening on the black hats...

Spoiler