Report: Father invites daughter’s alleged rapist over for dinner...

There is not "Forensic evidence of some kind...to dismiss the possibility of consent" in the majority of child rape cases. You do not need forensic evidence to convict someone of such a crime. Testimony is sufficient. Often there will be no remaining evidence by the time the victim reports the offense due to their fear.

Regardless--here it is clear that the dude raped her, as his paternity could be proven through her pregnancy. This was clearly not a criminal prosecution so no need for much in regards to the allegations. I'd hope you could tell whether or not your daughter would make such a thing up.

 

Hold up. Totally untrue. While testimony is sufficient in MOST cases, it is definitely not true in all. There are some loopholes and some ways to manipulate the system. This logic is akin to burning a female at the stake because she was accused of being a witch (based on pure hearsay "evidence.") Fair trial for all.

 

No--what I said is definitely true. You do not need forensic evidence to prove sexual assaults on children. That evidence usually does not exist and the majority of cases on those under 14 don't rely on it. It wouldn't make sense as a policy to require it. You can have a fair trial without DNA evidence implicating someone for assaulting a child. That's not "burning a female at the stake" nor is it a "loophole." The law operates the same way in every state in these cases. A loophole would be allowing criminals to get away with it because the victim was too afraid to report the crime in enough time to catch them.

 

Firmly disagree. One could simply force a child to come up with false accusations and brainwash them into believe the incident actually occurred. Thus, an adult could ruin another adults life by doing so with revenge being the motivation of doing so. I am not advocating that the majority of the time this is the case, but I feel a fair trial is needed. I'm sorry. That is near barbaric thinking.

 

You can disagree but that's the state of the law. You can't say "no you're wrong that's not how it works" then turn around and say "oh I just disagree with that." There are obvious policy reasons for it. This is why the indictments for sexual assaults of children include a 10 year time frame for the date of the offense. You cannot have an alibi for what you were doing on that day as children cannot be expected to remember the date they were assaulted. Sorry brah.

 

Okay. I will still disagree. I'm not tripping. You are still entitled to your opinion.

 

Chopped & burned...

 

Actual footage of the dinner party:

Spoiler

 

Found a picture of served dish:

 

This is absolutely disgusting. You CAN NOT take the law into your own hands. I mean, this is despicable, and he should have left this up to the police. This calls for some severe punishment! Something on the order of 1-2 weeks of Community Service should teach this thug dad a lesson!

 

That rapist is stupid... You rappe a girl, her dad asks you to come for dinner... Dont you ask yourself questions?

 

Was the dinner part even necessary? Why didnt the father just jump him the moment he was through the door?

 

must've roofied the soup