Ready The Clown Car: The First Batch of Democrats Are Ready To Announce Their 2020 Bids

Man you want to see drama so bad, you are extrapolating something from nothing.

How do you think winning Iowa will change voting patterns?

 

keep hope alive:

. . . we can be sure that the media will obsess over Amash for the next few days until it becomes clear that Amash isn’t a leading indicator of anything in the Republican caucuses. I’ll give it until next week.​

https://hotair.com/archives/2019/05/20/cnn-amashs-endorsement-impeachment-end-trump/

 

Keep Hope Alive!

It's funny that you extrapolate your favorable outcome from this particular poll but ignore the fact that Trump loses to the top 3 Democratic candidates in the general.

So should we pay attention to polls or not?

 

,​

Mojo's false equivalency

earth to Mojo, there were no investigation on "no- drama" obama​

Mojo parroting a false narrative

ur intellectual dishonesty manifests itself.

Mueller cited the DoJ policy that prevents him from charging the sitting president.

the 2nd part of the Mueller report provides facts documenting / detailing

10 instances of Trump obstructing justice,
acts that can be prosecuted once he is no longer POTUS​

 

So can the same be said about AOC.

 

Never said the poll was misleading, just wonder why you are forming a hypothesis on this one poll and thinking it's a trend when most polls have Biden with a double digit lead.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e...iowa_democratic_presidential_caucus-6731.html

And by the way He has a even bigger lead in New Hampshire.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e...ire_democratic_presidential_primary-6276.html

If we are speculating the discussion should be about what the majority of polls are actually saying.

 

lol

article speculating on whether the Dems are headed inevitably toward a brokered convention:

The rules are different for Democrats, and that makes the possibility that a candidate can win an early majority of the delegates in a crowded field far less likely. Instead of “winner-take-all” or “winner-takes-most” allocation, Democrats allocate delegates proportionately meaning that even a candidate who comes in third or fourth place in a given primary will get at least a few delegates while the candidate who comes in first will still get most of the delegates but not nearly as many as they would under a “winner take all” or “winner takes most” allocation system. The most immediate result of this is that in a contested primary where there are several candidates behind the frontrunner picking up delegates as the calendar moves forward, it will take longer for someone to rack up a majority than it would under the other allocation methods. It also makes at least the possibility that nobody will have a majority on the first ballot at a convention more likely.

The other thing to take into account here, of course, is the fact that Democrats have significantly changed their rules regarding how superdelegates work. Previously, these delegates, made up primarily of Democratic officeholders and party leaders, were allowed to back specific candidates and to vote on the first ballot at the convention. With the changes that were adopted last year, these delegates remain free to back whoever they wish but they would not be able to vote on the first ballot. This change would not have had a real impact on recent Democratic conventions since recent Democratic nominees — including but not limited to Al Gore, John Kerry, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton — all walked into their conventions with a sufficient number of “regular” delegates to win the nomination. Indeed, we have not had a brokered convention in the modern era and the odds of having one now are pretty low. Nonetheless, we’re likely to see speculation about a brokered Milwaukee convention for the Democrats right up until the point where such talk becomes mathematically unnecessary.​

https://www.outsidethebeltway.com/democrats-headed-for-a-brokered-convention

 

This thread is so much more entertaining when it is just the Os & Mojo show without interruption.

In honor of humorless political cartoons, this one's for mojo...

 

Cuomo and Hillary

 

This is disrespectful to Presidents Huckabee and Cruz

 

You can evaluate and speculate all you want and I will continue to comment on your blatant attempt to fit the data into your prescribed narrative.


OK.

 

Once again you find a poll that shows what you want to believe, yet in his actual poll Biden beats Trump.

https://scottrasmussen.com/general_election_matchups/

Biden 43% Trump 36%; Trump 38% Sanders 37%


If the 2020 election for President were held today, 43% of voters would cast their ballot for Joe Biden and 36% would prefer Donald Trump. A ScottRasmussen.com national survey found that 8% would vote for a third option, 5% would not vote, and 8% are not sure what they would do.

Biden’s seven-point lead is down slightly from a nine-point advantage a month ago and eleven-points two months ago.

Biden leads the president by ten among female voters but trails by three among male voters. Both Biden and the president do well within their own party. Biden leads by a 40% to 27% margin among Independent voters."

So what should hold more weight?

 

Prognostications about the 2020 results hold little water after the prognostications about the 2016 results.

 

Tell that to Mojo he is the one prognosticating.

Fun fact.

Polls were more accurate than not they were in the margin of error.

 

Uh, Ok? did I mention polls? I said, "prognostication" - yes, the prognostications were hugely wrong, considering they had Hillary winning in a blow out fashion and the opposite took place. The public temperature was not accurately read.