(obligatory) Shannon is gone, I heard... <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-kSrV_CubiQ?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-kSrV_CubiQ?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
He has a better chance of winning. No guarantees in the NFL. However at miami you can recruit insane amounts of talent. Look at the teams from the last 90 early 2000 you had a pro-bowlers all over the field.
Tom Dienhart(Rivals/Yahoo Sports): Early names at Miami: Mark Richt, Brent Venables, who played at K-State, where Miami AD Kirby Hocutt played, Mike Leach, Mario Cristobal
Mike Leach could dominate the ACC. Given what he was doing with middle-tier talent at Tech, imagine what he could do with Miami-quality talent & speed.
I think Shannon would be a good fit at many other programs where he doesn't necessarily face the off-field obstacles he faced at Miami.
looks like thats not true... @bhofheimer_espn on Gruden remains committed to @MNF_on_ESPN. Won't be headed to the U. His statement http://es.pn/e9IEYi
Isn't that a pay cut from MNF? to have to sweet tweet to a bunch of 16 year old prima donnas? 52 weeks a year.
Didn't graduation rates rise big time and Miami stopped having all those off-field arrest headlines during his tenure. Doesn't that buy any good will? Does winning trump all?
A lot of the off-field incidents at Miami were overblown (or magnified I should say) since it was Miami. Shannon did "clean up" the program but he didn't succeed at his primary job: win. He just wasn't a very good coach. I wouldn't say Miami is necessarily better off with "a few" arrests if it meant winning more games. What's been happening at Florida (arrests and scandals) is pathetic, but Meyer did win. I would say the attainable model is Stanford. Miami's academic standing (general student population and athletes) has improved significantly over the past decade, so there's no reason that they can't achieve to be what Stanford is now in football an what Duke is in basketball.