Erin Andrews is like Kim Kardashian to me...I WANT to say that she's overrated, and she's overhyped, and that she's not that hot. But then I see her.
[Applause] However, I still go with Rachel and that's not fair because I've never seen Rachel in anything revealing.
Watching the Fox pre-game show, I'm once again "meh" on Andrews. She's attractive but still not making me go bonkers like the hype makes her out to be. Just really skinny with a nice face and I guess most of the Euro-centric world really is into that sort of thing. I reiterate Nichols>Andrews, especially if she has ANY curvature.
The responses in this thread are blowing my mind. Nichols: Pale skinned, weird looking, pretty nasty hair, jacked up teeth, horrible at her job, not really in shape Andrews: tan blonde, leggy, fit, pretty hair and face, nice teeth How is this even close?
Huh? Re. your description of Rachel Nichols 1. Since when is a female being pale skinned a bad thing? I know some prefer their women to be as tan as possible but some actually do like pale skinned females. 2. Weird looking? O-k. Kinda vague. 3. pretty nasty hair?? In what pic? You know women put their hair in different hair styles. Is it just the fact that she has red hair that makes it "nasty" to you? 4. jacked up teeth? What picture have you seen with her teeth that shows they are jacked up? I consider jacked up to be like a Kirsten Dunst snaggle type of thing or even "Jerome" from the TV show Martin. 5.Horrible at her job? This is CF, none of us guys really gives a crap if the female sportscaster can put together a coherent sentence man, c'mon. 6. Not really in shape? How did you determine that? Because she is not in bikini's? Because she has some curves on her? C'mon man. I can understand if one has a love for Erin Andrews that news of her b****yness till won't destroy such love for her but to just make up stuff about Rachel Nichols is not right.
<br> I don't even get this... Is this the real world? Nichols looks like she's below average looking compared to most every girl I see on a day to day basis. 1. I guess that's a matter of preference. Personally don't like her skin tone tho. 2. She just looks weird. Her facial features are whacks. Not aesthetically pleasing. Big nose; weird chin; her smile looks odd in every pic; chubby cheeks proof: Spoiler 3. Nah **** looks like she doesn't spend much time on it. Like she needs to invest in a good hairstylist or something. 4. Posted earlier in this thread: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dgaproductions/4658890884/ Da fuq is that **** mang? They're jacked up as hell. They're not even white... -_- 5. People who don't excel at what they do turn me off to a great extent. I guess not having low standards accounts for something 6. I determine that b/c most pics I have seen of her she tries her best to cover up dat bod. If she had it she'd flaunt it. Pretty basic principle. She wears loose fitting clothing that hides a lot. Meh.
Dude, All I'll say is you have some high standards brothaman. More power to you. (Re. Rachel Nichols always covering up her body- she has curves. Some girls with curves feel self conscious and always want to cover up instead of flaunting them curves. Rachel seems to be in the insecure about her curves category.)
<br> Yeah that's definitely true. But hey, you getting da two gurls at once mayne! Da reps belong to you
