Quanell X humiliated, marginalized by large crowd in Pasadena

at nighttime.

 

thanks, Doug Llewelyn.

 

ok mr "roaming mobs of untrained vigilante having shootout in neighborhoods"

i understood the point you were making about how dangerous it could be to allow vigilante justice

do you understand my point that there should be consequences if you break the law?

 

what are you quoting this for, I never said it, classic strawmen, if you have to resort to these tatics, have a nice day

 

Nope.

 

not from what i found. the nightime youre referring to is found in the section pertaining to defense of ones own property. and the way i interpret the passage, nighttime is just one of the options, not the only time when deadly force is justified.

heres what it says...

from: http://www.self-defender.net/law3.htm

Deadly Force to Protect Property

"A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect his property to the degree he reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, theft during the nighttime or criminal mischief during the nighttime, and he reasonably believes that the property cannot be protected by any other means."

"A person is justified in using deadly force against another to pervent the other who is fleeing after committing burglary, robbery, or theft during the nighttime, from escaping with the property and he reasonable believes that the property cannot be recovered by any other means; or, the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the property would expose him or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury. (Nighttime is defined as the period 30 minutes after sunset until 30 minutes before sunrise.)"



the way i interpret this...

"A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect his property to the degree he reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent the other's imminent commission of:

1) arson,
2) burglary,
3) robbery,
4) theft during the nighttime or
5) criminal mischief during the nighttime,

and he reasonably believes that the property cannot be protected by any other means."

"A person is justified in using deadly force against another to pervent the other who is:

1) fleeing after committing burglary,
2) robbery, or
3) theft during the nighttime,

from escaping with the property and he reasonable believes that the property cannot be recovered by any other means; or, the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the property would expose him or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury. (Nighttime is defined as the period 30 minutes after sunset until 30 minutes before sunrise.)"



remember this passage is about defense of ones own property. the horn incident is defense of a neighbors property.

 

seems to me youre pulling the same tactics on me. im trying to keep this civil but you seem to want to increase the level of intensity.

y are you taking this thread so personally?

 

Where were they shot (part of their body, I mean)???

 

i read on one of the posts that one of the burglars approached horn white the other fled...

so front on one and back on the other???

 

seriously dude, you make up quotes and attribute them to me, and you've used about four or five " " in response to me and I'm taking it to personally?

 

whether Joe Horn deserves to be prosecuted or not, i don't know. but i'm not shedding a tear for the douchebags who got shot for breaking into homes terrorizing people.

i personally hope he gets off.

 

hey youve been taking my statements out of context and said i was trying to "inflame" this thread... and ill add another to that.

1) like i said im not trying to get into a typing match here.

2) like i said i respect your opinion

3) like i said according to the law, joe horn has the right to defend his neighbors property. (although im no legal expert, the law seems pretty clear to me). lets leave this to the legal system.

4) like i said, i agree with you. its not safe to let untrained people fire weapons but when it comes to defense of property, they have that right. and if theyre being reckless, they lose their right and will be prosecuted.

since when has the " " been viewed as taking something personally? i always viewed it as letting something "roll off your back"

 

lol. Another thread involving pgab, analogies, and black people.

I'm sensing a pattern here.

 

you stalking me?

I don't even know the race of the burglars btw

 

or the race of the shooter

 

400 meter.


thanks....thank you very much, houston. you're beautiful. tip your waitresses.

 

nope. just reading a thread and being bemused.

 

Hispanic?

 

btw, given the name of the burglars I wouldn't have assumed they were black, so go back to your little keyboard and continue to stalk me from there before coming in and making attributing another inaccurate statement to me.

 

dude. quannel x is black. the whole thread is about him.