Proposed method to track performance of our starters

Let's look at the scores after 48games...

At SF(48g) - 34 points - one point dip again - Still at the Good level though. Top teams at this position - OKC (51 points), MIA (50 points) and IND (48 points).

At PF(48g) - 23 points - one point gain - but still at the Bottom of the Pile. Top teams in this position are SAS (49 points), UTA and POR (45 points).

At C(48g) - 27 points - dropped 3 points - dropped to Needs More Development level. Top teams in this position are UTA (47 points), LAL (45 points) and CHI (43 points).

At SG(48g) - 50 points - still at the ELITE level - top teams are HOU (50 points), MIA (49 points) and MIL (46 points).

At PG(48g) - 39 points - improve by 1 point - moved to Superstar level. Top teams are LAC (49 points), OKC (44 points), PHI and CHA (43 points).

At Bench(48g) - 36 points - improve by 3 points - still at decent level. Top teams are DEN (51 points), LAC (47 points) and DET (46 points).

hmmm, how would we fare agains the next 3 teams?
HOU vs GSW
34 vs 22 1:0
23 vs 39 0:1
27 vs 21 1:0
50 vs 36 1:0
39 vs 40 0:1
36 vs 30 1:0
We ought to win based on the ability of our players.

HOU vs LAC
34 vs 21 1:0
23 vs 43 0:1
27 vs 30 0:1
50 vs 18 1:0
39 vs 49 0:1
36 vs 47 0:1
We probably would lose this... sigh

HOU vs OKC
34 vs 51 0:1
23 vs 29 0:1
27 vs 23 1:0
50 vs 38 1:0
39 vs 44 0:1
36 vs 21 1:0
Could be a close one - Go rockets!