Not a particularly encouraging NYTimes Op-ed from a guy who wrote a well-received history of the 1918 flu...
His book on the Spanish flu was what scared the bejesus out of me when I first read about this one. This sounds like good news: So, if anybody has a particularly nagging cough they've picked up in the past couple of days, or knows anyone who does, party at my place this weekend! Free booze, plus all Kleenex confiscated at the door! Me hablo espanol! Evacuees welcome! Let's just hope, when the buzz of this news story dies down, that government & pharmaceutical companies are still compelled to run it.
Putting things in perspective... _____ Regular flu has killed thousands since January An outbreak of swine flu that is suspected in more than 150 deaths in Mexico and has sickened dozens of people in the United States and elsewhere has grabbed the attention of a nervous public and of medical officials worried the strain will continue to mutate and spread. Experts are nervous that, as a new strain, the swine flu will be harder to stop because there aren't any vaccines to fight it. But even if there are swine-flu deaths outside Mexico -- and medical experts say there very well may be -- the virus would have a long way to go to match the roughly 36,000 deaths that seasonal influenza causes in the United States each year. "That happens on an annual basis," Dr. Brian Currie said Tuesday. Currie is vice president and medical director at Montefiore Medical Center in Bronx, New York. Since January, more than 13,000 people have died of complications from seasonal flu, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's weekly report on the causes of death in the nation. No fewer than 800 flu-related deaths were reported in any week between January 1 and April 18, the most recent week for which figures were available. The report looks at deaths in the 122 largest cities in the United States. Worldwide, the annual death toll from the flu is estimated to be between 250,000 and 500,000. full article
Not very reassuring, since we know what the regular flu does already. This is more about fear of the unknown and the potential to worsen. It's like saying that because gang violence in america kills X number of people per year that we shouldn't be worrying about a potential war that is brewing somewhere...
How about this from the Sci Guy? Sounds like this thing may be about to calm down. And by the time it starts back up again in the fall, we'll be ready for it.
I read that last night and I thought it was funny that the claim was: "hey, this is just like what happened with the spanish flu, so i'm optimistic!"
First official US swine flu death. 23 month old toddler. IN HOUSTON. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090429/ap_on_he_me/med_swine_flu We're all ****ed.
There does seem to be an emerging consensus, that this will percolate until reappearing (in some slightly mutated form) next flu season. That's still not exactly a rosy scenario, however. If the second wave of this stuff is anything like the incredibly lethal second wave of the Spanish Flu (a tremendously big if, if the reports of the deaths in Mexico continue to prove aberrant), we still have a major problem. I don't believe we've ever manufactured 300 million dosages of vaccine in this country, given only a few months lead time. Already, in the past few flu seasons, there were reports of vaccine shortages, for the smaller percentage of the population who bothers to get them. Even if the government & pharmaceutical companies were able to produce a vaccine by next flu season, they would still need to band together and synthesize 300 million doses, to cover most or all Americans. We'd need to institute something akin to a mandatory nationwide vaccination program, ignoring those who deny the risk and the Jenny McCarthys who cry vaccine safety (as happened in the 1976 false alarm). Even if that occured, globally, I don't think there's even a remote possibility of creating 6 billion plus vaccines by winter. So, the industrialized world might be okay, but the rest of the world would be left to suffer? Without such a national vaccine program, 40,000 US deaths would likely remain the baseline for potential deaths next winter from this thing, assuming it sticks around as a weakened strain. Those forty thousand are the weak, young and elderly, who cannot handle the normal influenza illness. (They are the ones currently instructed to get flu vaccines.) They are the zebras in the nature videos, coltish, or graying with pronounced limps; when the lions catch up to them, it's understood to be part of the natural order. On top of that, add the people in Mexico City, reported to be healthy adults with sound immune systems, who after contracting one strain of this flu drowned in their own lungs. They were healthy one moment, then a few days later they drowned in their own lungs. If that stuff is real, and it gets out before a vaccine can be mass-produced, or if present antivirals prove ineffective (I believe Napolitano stated the other day that we have 50 million instances of Tamiflu in storage), whether it be tomorrow or next flu season, you still have to worry about the remainder of the zebra herd.
I remember hearing that this was the same situation with Avian flu, that seemingly the ones who should be the most healthy suffer more. One explanation that I heard was that the immune system goes into overdrive to fight the infection and its that counter reaction that ends up killing the patient. So someone who has a weaker immune system is oddly safer since it is a more measured response from the body to the infection. This is just from what I recall but I will see if I can find something about that. That said its still a good idea to exercise, rest, and eat right to keep your immune system as strong as it can be.
from 1976... <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/T_qJ2tOY7ss&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/T_qJ2tOY7ss&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
You're right; it's called a cytokine storm. It's what made the Spanish flu so deadly 90 years ago, and the reports of similar deaths in Mexico are what make me pay attention to this one. However, to me, "healthy people drowning inside their own lungs" sounds a lot more terrifying than "immune overreaction" or "cytokine storm." Although, as stated earlier, the latter would make a pretty kick*** band name. But, if things go south, you'd end up having to change your name, like Anthrax did after the postal attacks in 2001. Bah. For my two cents, Invisible Fan has the right idea. We're all playing chess with the Reaper anyway. Eat, drink and be merry. Immune suppression away!
Howabout its easier to pick up chicks if you have a healthy immune system since biologically we are more likely to look for mates that are physically healthier.