1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Positives from Week 1

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by Two Sandwiches, Sep 13, 2015.

  1. Two Sandwiches

    Two Sandwiches Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    22,611
    Likes Received:
    14,201
    We found our QB.


    We didn't give up any points after half time adjustments.


    Everyone else in the dovision is losing, at last glance


    Fear not boys, it's a long enough season, they'll put today in the rear view. When we get Foster back, we'll be okay. Mallett time.


    I also think not having the ones together in the preseason hurt the defense. Live and learn.
     
  2. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,131
    Watt and Clowney.

    Deandre and Washington.
     
  3. rawbrah

    rawbrah Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2015
    Messages:
    681
    Likes Received:
    159
    just glad we don't have to wait til week 8 to see a QB change

    gotta give OB credit for that at least
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. whag00

    whag00 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,611
    Likes Received:
    3,587
    I think the tight ends did a decent job of getting open...qbs were just missing them.
    Run defense was solid.

    I can still see this team going 9-7 or 10-6. KC is probably one of the better teams they will play.
     
  5. sealclubber1016

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    19,150
    Likes Received:
    27,934
    If Mallett is the starter, that's a huge positive. Even though he very well may suck, there's at least a chance that he won't, which is a lot more than I can say for Hoyer.

    Colts may be hurt, Clowney looked good and Hopkins is officially a stud. Plenty of positives despite the awful first half.
     
  6. Cannonball

    Cannonball Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    21,649
    Likes Received:
    1,907
    RB by committee looked good. 4.7 ypc, all 3 over 4.4 ypc.
     
  7. conquistador#11

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    36,107
    Likes Received:
    22,594
    if mallet sinks, it will force b.o.b to go get that young qb he thinks he can develop. clowney looked oustanding, watt is god, crick and willfork did some nice work.
    Romeo will adjust to the screen game next time we face it.
     
  8. HR Dept

    HR Dept Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2012
    Messages:
    6,792
    Likes Received:
    1,223
    Defense was solid, they were really put into bad situations by turnovers in the first half.

    Two HUGE missed pass interference calls in the first half could've changed the game despite the offense's inept play.

    Looks like Mallet can be adequate.

    The Colts.
     
  9. JayGoogle

    JayGoogle Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    50,208
    Likes Received:
    40,920
    Everyone saying we have a new QB need to slow down. Sometimes coaches are more about themselves and will let QB decisions sink their career.

    The only positives I see is that Hopkins is a legit #1 WR. We ran the ball pretty well minus Foster. Clowney looked good out there and we stopped one of the elite runners from rushing the ball.

    Also, our division sucks. Colts are good but they are not invincible. Titans may win today but they are playing the Bucs.
     
  10. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    63,444
    Likes Received:
    26,038
    You wouldn't be saying that if Hoyer hadn't been pulled. Playing Mallett for 2 drives tripled his yardage.
     
  11. Ericstocracy

    Ericstocracy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2012
    Messages:
    934
    Likes Received:
    115
    The only positive at QB was that Hoyer got benched and Mallet was ready to come in and play. Whether that will turn into Mallet starting and thus performing as such, who knows. But at least with him in as the signal caller they moved fast and with a purpose.

    RB by committee wasn't so bad, good average per, just nothing explosive. The interior line was getting worked hard because of the hole at LG. LT, C, and RG all having to do way more because LG was so horrible.

    WR group as a whole looked great. Sad that Hoyer can't make the throws necessary to get the ball to Hop. Wasn't until Mallet was in when Hopkins took over.

    Watt and Clowney were looking terrific. Especially towards the end when Clowney was finally knocking some rust off, was looking explosive again. Wilfork was doing his job, and Crick is looking like he'll continue his growth and become a more well rounded player.

    Cush looked quick again.
     
  12. HR Dept

    HR Dept Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2012
    Messages:
    6,792
    Likes Received:
    1,223
    Also, I think Polk should get the bulk of the carries until Foster comes back.
     
  13. Scolalist

    Scolalist Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,590
    Likes Received:
    57
    Mallet looked decent in junk time, saying we found our QB is really reaching right now.

    The Dline was impressive, secondary didn't give up much.

    Receiving unit and TE's played well.

    LB's in coverage on Kelce, OL not protecting, getting a good push and the Hoyer turnovers were the bad.

    I do think the Chiefs are a playoff team though and this was one of the toughest games I thought on the schedule heading in.
     
  14. JayGoogle

    JayGoogle Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    50,208
    Likes Received:
    40,920
    Lol this is true.

    Looked up and saw Hopkins suddenly had like 98 yds and a TD. Not surprising though, I was never big on Hoyer and i'll be happy to sacrifice this game if it means he's regulated to back up duty which is what he is.

    Not that I expect Mallet to be great or anything but even Fitzpatrick is better than Hoyer and that's...that's just sad.
     
  15. thedude077

    thedude077 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    3,645
    Likes Received:
    1,315
    1. Clowney is looking good and will get better.
    2. Ryan Mallett looked better than Brian Hoyer and hopefully Mallett starts.
    3. JJ Watt is a beast.
     
  16. RedIsen

    RedIsen Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Messages:
    874
    Likes Received:
    720
    A game of two halves for the defense. Maybe giving the starters a lot of preseason to rest wasn't such a great idea? Or it could just be too much nervous energy/adrenaline. Defense would have looked a lot better if not for the two TOs giving the Chiefs good field position.
    Either way, it was good seeing the second half adjustment and Clowney make an impact.

    Receivers look great. Washington and Shorts look to be reliable, and Nuk is the real deal.

    This was definitely a winnable game. But early season losses are easier to handle. Hoping we see more second half Texans.
     
  17. roxstarz

    roxstarz Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    238
    The good - Watt, Mallet, Hopkins, Washington

    The meh - Cushing is just not the same he's to slow, Clowney I expect a first round first overall choice to be better than what he showed, Wilfork, Mercilus- did he even play outside of the first defensive drive? 0 impact again, not sure why we re-signed this scrub.

    The awful - Hoyer had one or two solid drives but was awful outside of that, the oline was pretty bad, our entire defensive scheme is just a horrible fit, having our corners give 10 yards cushions, John Simon was bad.
     
  18. Cstyle42

    Cstyle42 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    21,898
    Likes Received:
    13,351
    Hoyer is done YES YES YES!!!!
     
  19. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    63,444
    Likes Received:
    26,038
    They haven't officially announced that yet. Of course it would be almost inconceivable for them to stick with Hoyer.....but one would have thought that about naming him in the first place.

    Given BOB's relationship with Hoyer, I won't assume he's gone till it's official. BOB loves him some Brian Hoyer.
     
  20. bobrek

    bobrek Politics belong in the D & D

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 1999
    Messages:
    36,288
    Likes Received:
    26,639
    So, is special teams sucking (as usual) just a given since no one seems to be talking about it?
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now