1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Portland - Houston trade

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Sir Geving, Apr 21, 2003.

  1. Sir Geving

    Sir Geving Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    971
    Likes Received:
    67
    Bonzi is more of SF, so move him there. And Patterson is more of SG so move him too.
    And then you will see that this is a good trade for both teams. Especially since the chemistry between Randolph and Patterson isn't so good. (punching incident). They will want to move one of them.

    Damon Stoudamire/Jeff McInnis
    Cat/Patterson
    Bonzi/Pippen/Woods/Morris
    Rasheed Wallace/Maurice Taylor
    Dale Davis/Sabonis
     
  2. leebigez

    leebigez Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    15,822
    Likes Received:
    794
    After Pippen leaves, why don't Portland move Wallace to the 3, which is the way he plays anyway so Randolph can start. They've been kknown to over load with players, but I pretty sure they wouldn't do this one.
     
  3. KeepJuaquin

    KeepJuaquin Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2003
    Messages:
    865
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pippen doesn't even want to go back to Portland.

    So

    Stoudamire/McInnis
    Mobley/Patterson
    Wells/Woods/Morris
    Wallace/Taylor
    Davis/Sabonis

    Steve/Antonio/Moochie
    Derek/James/Juaquin
    Bostjan/James/Glen
    Eddie/Zach
    Yao/Kelvin

    Ugh. Well....our backcourt would be very deep indeed. But still...we would be very young and even more inconsistent. :( We don't even have a game plan. Even though Derek Anderson and Antonio Daniels are good players...they might not be that great under Rudy. I know Zach Randolph would do great. :)

    Yao would be our only inside presence. And he might not even improve that much...

    But I would still do the trade. ;)
     
  4. Sir Geving

    Sir Geving Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    971
    Likes Received:
    67
    Cuz' Bonzi plays the three.
    And Sheed is a PF, and he likes to play PF.
    And they want to move either Randolph or Patterson, so it's natural that they may want to trade Zach, since Sheed gives them quality minutes at PF.
    And Pippen has actually been their starting PG this season.... He hasn't played a lot of SF. Bonzi plays the SF for them.
     
  5. Qball

    Qball Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,151
    Likes Received:
    210
    If Taylor leaves, who the hell is gonna be out backup PF?? I know eddie aint gonna play 40+ mins a game.
     
  6. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,182
    Likes Received:
    2,828
    It seems like we are losing the best player in this deal, and trading our all offense no defense PF for theirs. What are we getting out of this, a backup PG? Pass. Just sign Jon Barry with the MLE and you accomplish the same thing but keep the best player out of the deal.
     
  7. Sir Geving

    Sir Geving Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    971
    Likes Received:
    67
    Zach Randolph!
     
  8. Sir Geving

    Sir Geving Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    971
    Likes Received:
    67
    Anderson > Mobley
    Daniels > Morris
    Randolph = Taylor

    Anderson is a great shooter, with a nice 4.3 apg. And I think it will be a better backourt with Francis/Anderson than Francis/Mobley.
    There's no doubt that we need Daniels more than Morris...
    Randolph will have to shape up, or he will get traded by the blazers. Zach is a great scorer, I think he is a better scorer than Taylor and he's the future. Mo-T is a vet, so he's valuable to. And he has been a really great spark off the bench this year. However I think Zach will be better for us right away. And he will only get better.
     
  9. Nova

    Nova Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2002
    Messages:
    687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ya know.. I doubt the Blazers would like this trade.. even if they wanted to get rid of Randolph. Would they really give up Anderson for Mobley?? And Randolph for Taylor?? I would hope the Blazers would part with Daniels though, he doesn't seem to be getting much pt over there. I'd love to have him here.
     
  10. JoeBarelyCares

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2001
    Messages:
    6,609
    Likes Received:
    1,883
    If we trade for Zach and keep Eddie, we could have the all-teammate punch-out team.
     
  11. kidrock8

    kidrock8 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2000
    Messages:
    6,414
    Likes Received:
    4
    I don't think the trade makes sense for either team. The Rockets need to upgrade the front court, not the backcourt. The only way they can upgrade the front court is by trading Mo + junk for a PF.

    Por would be getting ripped off talent-wise.
     
  12. Sir Geving

    Sir Geving Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    971
    Likes Received:
    67
    We are upgrading the frontcourt with Randolph.....:(
     
  13. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390



    hehehehehehehehe

    too funny
     
  14. Woofer

    Woofer Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2000
    Messages:
    3,995
    Likes Received:
    1
    Could we have a rule for this kinda of thread, title must contain the word *potential*?
     
  15. silent j

    silent j Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    556
    Likes Received:
    0
    I like it, but Anderson tore his miniscus last night, so he might be out for a while.
    j
     
  16. drpepper

    drpepper Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2001
    Messages:
    931
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know what some people think around here, but Mobley is better than Anderson, significantly better.

    And Daniels is a scrub.

    Zach and MoT are =.

    Replace Mobes with Wells and we got a deal!

    I don't know if you guys realize it, but Mobes is a hot comodity in the NBA.
     
  17. Sir Geving

    Sir Geving Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    971
    Likes Received:
    67
    I think Anderson would be a better player for Houston than Cat is. He's more unselfish, and he's a team player. He also got a nice shooting touch.

    Daniels was a solid PG for the Spurs, it's just so many PG up in Portland so he hasn't got much PT. And he's definetly better than Moochie, so he would strenghten our team as Francis' backup.

    Zach is already better than Mo-T. And has proven himself time after time this season, it's just that he plays the same position as Sheed. Zach is also a very young player, and he will only get better.

    Houston wins on this trade. But I think both teams win on this trade. The question isn't that if we should do it, it's more would blazers do it?
     
  18. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,866
    Likes Received:
    3,208
    The next teammate who likes Jeff McInnis will be the 1st. Keep him A W A Y!

    DA is good, good for Rox, but ever fragile. That is scary.
     
  19. Fegwu

    Fegwu Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    5,162
    Likes Received:
    4
    Derrick Anderson is good. But he is too injury prone. He will be going under the knife again next week. He may not even be ready to start next season.
     
  20. themocitydon

    themocitydon Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    0
    the last time the rockets made a deal with portland: we were cursed with kelvin cato. i wouldnt do it simply because of bad karma.
     

Share This Page