1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Polygamy: For or Against

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Rocket River, Apr 17, 2010.

?

Polygamy: Would you vote for it or against it.

  1. For

    38 vote(s)
    48.7%
  2. Against

    40 vote(s)
    51.3%
  1. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,992
    Likes Received:
    19,937
    I think we
    all know
    what
    that is

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Coach AI

    Coach AI Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    7,992
    Likes Received:
    849
    just don't get married if you aren't ready to 'settle down'.

    simple
     
  3. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,992
    Likes Received:
    19,937
    don't tell people how to live their lives.

    also simple.
     
  4. Pest_Ctrl

    Pest_Ctrl Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Messages:
    1,064
    Likes Received:
    55
    If you have 10 wives it's less likely you would be spending that much energy on each one of them. If you have a problem with wife No. 5, just go hang out with wife No. 7. ;)
     
  5. conquistador#11

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    39,195
    Likes Received:
    28,369
    Yes, because men of god were polygamists. Energy? Some lived to be 170 plus years. :p
     
  6. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,800
    Likes Received:
    41,240
    I simply don't give a damn. If a woman wants to live with two men, or vice versa, and no one is hurt, who cares?
     
  7. Shroopy2

    Shroopy2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    16,255
    Likes Received:
    2,037
    Though life is never fair and balanced, the issue is having enough supply left for everyone else. In a small community, 2 guys sweeping up 14 total women and having legal "ownership" over them cuts down on the available wife pool for other men. We complain enough about uneven distribution of things like tax dollars into others' self interests.Men like to bone. Kind of important to our well being. We're going to condone uneven distribution of women and decreasing our chance at having a sexually compatible life partner?

    Thats a bad approach of "finders-keepers" thats hard to go for. Its men buying their chance at saying "She is mine, you can't have her".

    If the women and men decide to do that on their own with no legally written vows, then can't do anything about that, its their free choice.
     
  8. Dairy Ashford

    Dairy Ashford Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,585
    Likes Received:
    1,888
    I love the well-couched commoditization of women in this post.
     
  9. napalm06

    napalm06 Huge Flopping Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    26,937
    Likes Received:
    30,569
    One woman is enough to handle, thanks.

    PS the reasons divorce rates are so high is partially because people are becoming increasingly inept at dating and courting in general... totally different topic though.
     
  10. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    65,317
    Likes Received:
    33,037
    Interesting thing about this thread
    No one even imagines a Marriage of Two [or more] Men and One Woman.
    [Martha Stewart or Oprah with a Harem of dudes.]

    The legal ramification seem to be the one cause the biggest stir.

    Rocket River
     
  11. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,800
    Likes Received:
    41,240
    You might look up a few posts, RR.
     
  12. Coach AI

    Coach AI Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    7,992
    Likes Received:
    849
    I'm saying it seems a logical solution to the 'problem'.

    To clarify: what is the benefit of getting married if you want to be with multiple people? Seems like if you want to have your fun and stay 'free', it's much smarter to do just that.
     
    #32 Coach AI, Apr 17, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2010
  13. Refman

    Refman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2002
    Messages:
    13,674
    Likes Received:
    312
    If that is how the individuals want to live, I don't have a problem with it in theory. One of the legal niceties about the state recognition of marriage is the ease in doing things like determining property rights when there is no will. It just all goes to the spouse.

    When the law will have to decide who gets what or how much among several spouses, it becomes a judicial nightmare to administer.
     
  14. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,156
    Likes Received:
    10,259
    Hence the qualifiers in my post "doing it right" and "right way."

    You could have relationships with a bunch of women, but I wouldn't call that marriage.

    (And that's not necessarily a moral statement, just a personal definition of marriage, which for me tends towards the concept of equal partners and mutual respect and love. Of course, I could be biased, having lived in Utah for awhile... I knew some polygamists and I never saw anything other than the women being absolutely subservient.)
     
  15. Dairy Ashford

    Dairy Ashford Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,585
    Likes Received:
    1,888
    I'm trying to figure out how much more difficult it would be than splitting between children. Total Assets / Total Spouses = Spousal Share. Although the initial tracking and monitoring of assets might be tough, if everyone's both dishonest or disorganized and has their own lawyer. Or if one or more of the wives are estranged and out of state, and decedent never granted a divorce. And she died, and you two had a kid. Okay, I think I see your point.
     
  16. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,169
    Likes Received:
    48,342
    Without seeing a specific proposal I'm not going to say yea or nay.

    In principal if multiple individuals want to live in something they call marriage I don't have a problem with it provided they contractually define it. As I've said before ideally I would like to see all marriage defined through contract law and under that you could have a polygamist marriage.
     
  17. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,050
    If I ever considered multiple partners after marriage, I'd go with the Tiger Woods solution.
     
  18. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,281
    RR, care to tell us why you seem to have such a strong personal interest in this topic?
     
  19. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    21,123
    Likes Received:
    22,594
    There are tons of these. You are just not used to seeing them. They are rare ofcourse.

    But your comment does not control for:

    What's the difference between 4 men having weak and dependent wives or 1 man having 3 weak and dependent wives?
     
  20. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    21,123
    Likes Received:
    22,594
    ^^ Those are basically my views. Yes I'm Muslim. No I don't think 4 is a magic number. I just think that, given the right set of conditions (as with any marriage), there's no reason to stop people from doing it.

    Would I ever do it? No. I don't think I could be fair. I don't BELIEVE that. But I have seen it work and therefore can't say it wouldn't work. It would require tilting rights/entitlements/etc significantly in the women's favor.
     

Share This Page