So, Feinstein had the letter but she now claims she didn't leak it nor did her staff? So, who did then? This is confusing. Ok...so now they are saying the letter was never leaked. But, they are saying that Ford talked to her friends about the assault and one of them leaked it to the press. Alrighty then.
I doubt it changes the outcome. I think he will be approved. Her timing of the accusation...along with the amount of time that has passed before her accusation came out...is enough to sow some doubt. This wouldn't hold up in a criminal trial. We are never going to get to the bottom of this (i.e. the real truth) because there is no real evidence and it's 'she said...he said'. I don't think it was enough to sway any Republicans into a nay vote. They would be turning against the majority of their own party and I doubt it would be pretty for them. But, we'll see.
Yeah, maybe. I'm not a super political savy guy, but caught this article looking around trying to find facts of the situation. Not sure if Breitbart is credible or just a national inquirer type site. A lot of this is also backed up on other sites as well: https://www.breitbart.com/big-gover...ons-found-in-christine-blasey-ford-documents/ Or "Twitchy"? I dunno... https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2...mory-is-in-serious-need-of-a-wapo-fact-check/ Seems BS crazy...again, if she didn't want to come out with this bc she was afraid, intimidated, etc. But "suddenly" ready to tell the world bc she feels like she's trying to do the right thing? Sorry man, I'm not buying it.
Hard to get too much collaboration when three in the room, the victim, the accused, and his friend who they chose not to have testify.
Mark Judge was the person that for apparent reasons was not called to testify... and his lack of honesty during this doesn't inspire confidence that people will get a fair shake with this judge...
So Dems all day brought up Judge not being called as a witness as a negative to the Republicans case, and the Republicans just forgot about to mention that it was the Dems who refused to call Judge as a witness??? Are you drunk?? Seriously?
Fixed the typo. However it’s not F-ing rocket science to understand. The Republicans would have railed at the Dems talking all day about the Republicans NOT calling Judge to testify if it was in fact the Dems who held back testimony as you are insinuating. This isn’t hard.
I took it as a reference to if Feinstein was honest about calling or not calling Judge to testify. I think Feinstein is a Democrat through and through but she’s not a blatant partisan liar like Trump and now Kavanaugh who now decided to jump in the deep end into post truth Trumpism. Trump and now Kavanaugh are proven liars who will say anything and everything they can in the moment to get by the moment. Feinstein is old school like Grassley. Everyone knows the team shes on, but at least there’s some class. Pretty sad where we are now.
Heh, you can't even answer a pretty simple and direct question honestly. kavanaugh was tripped up a number of times this past week or two. Even about whether he watched Ms. Ford's testimony. And according to senator collins, he won't overturn Roe because its settled law. Yea, remember that lie.
Kavanaugh lied about watching Dr Fords testimony and he obviously lied on purpose because F it. Just think how small and stupid that is. Just tells you all you need to know about the Trump base. Sack up and be the loud mouth belligerent troll we want you to be ... because we hate libs.
