he also played against one of the worst teams in the league, in depleted washington and another complete joke in new jersey. i could dominate middle schoolers in high school too but they wouldn't give me mvp. he's a great talent but the mvp can't be out of the east in my book. i give it to baron davis for getting rid of dallas.
BigM, what you've just typed is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Timmy D. He is like a man among boys out there. How far would we have gotten if we had Duncan instead of Yao?
A 1962 Wilt Chamberlain couldn't make it out of the first round with Rafer, Battier, and Hayes in the starting lineup...
If there is any chance of JVG going to the Kings we should geta move on and get Artest out of there before JVG takes over as Head Coach!!!
Duncan without a doubt. Boozer played good. But not as good as Duncan. James didn't play against good teams. Duncan is just sick this play-off, he has showed that he is the best player in the NBA.
Sad but true. If Boozer was to become a superstar, he had to leave Cleveland and be the man to carry the Jazz. But he may never win a championship in Utah. No, I do not believe the Jazz will ever win it all. If Boozer wanted to win a championship, he should have stayed in Cleveland to team up with Lebron. But in that case he might never reach the status of a superstar. It 's a trade off between being the man on a playoff team or being the second-fiddle on a championship team.
