1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Peja Stojakovic an option?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by G-Money, Sep 23, 2010.

  1. AggieRocketsFan

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,378
    Likes Received:
    82
    No way, Peja has no intangibles.
     
  2. itony

    itony Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    815
    Likes Received:
    36
    i would...on nba live. he's my sixth man and leading 3 point shooter in the league
     
  3. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    29,897
    Likes Received:
    20,046
    Am I reading your OP right?

    You basically want us to trade our expiring contracts now for...an expiring contract two years from now?

    What exactly do we get by trading Battier and Jeffries for Peja? Some dude who's an overall worse player than Battier yet makes 1.5x his salary? Not to mention instead of having an expiring contract now, we still have to swallow 15M for the next two years?

    LOL you're an NO fan right? There's absolutely no logical reason for trading for Peja alone. None.
     
  4. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    29,897
    Likes Received:
    20,046
    Except that Peja makes 15 Mil and Battier makes 7M. Does the concept of salaries and the salary cap elude you? Also even if we compare the boxscore stats Peja's % isn't that different from Battier's %...just that Peja took more shots.
     
  5. DCkid

    DCkid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2001
    Messages:
    9,660
    Likes Received:
    2,704
    I definitely don't want Battier or Budinger to start, but Peja won't cut it. More importantly I think we need to pair a good defensive player with Kevin Martin (unless it's Carmelo). A guy who can play offense AND defense would be even better (wow, imagine that!).
     
  6. Mav-Hater

    Mav-Hater Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,942
    Likes Received:
    185
    Just what we need. A net gain of 4 points a game for an extra 10 million. Now take away 10 points a game for the defensive liability Peja is compared to Shane and we lose 6 points a game and gain 10 million in Payroll. Definitely sounds like a move Morey would want to make :rolleyes: Really the move is that of a shear MORON
     
  7. mi0304

    mi0304 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    5
    all I have to say is:

    WHY?
     
  8. napalm06

    napalm06 Huge Flopping Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    26,913
    Likes Received:
    30,515
    Man, you're right.....

    Those extra 4 points will be so valuable.
     
  9. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,720
    Likes Received:
    15,000
    man g money you ruffled some feathers in this thread.
     
  10. rockets88MT

    rockets88MT Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,340
    Likes Received:
    52
    lol no way

    The only way we stop kobe/artest, james/wade is with lee/battier

    Battier is gold to have.. :rolleyes:
     
  11. G-Money

    G-Money Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    687
    Likes Received:
    36
    Lol. :grin:
     
  12. larsv8

    larsv8 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    21,663
    Likes Received:
    13,916
    Wow, terrible.
     
  13. DaGreatest

    DaGreatest Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1,663
    Likes Received:
    170
  14. rock4ever

    rock4ever Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,257
    Likes Received:
    38
    He's done more than Shane Battier. Defensivley, Shane's the better player. But offensivley Pedja's MILES better than Shane and better compliments Yao. Since we already have Lee and Jeffries, Battier's defense will be collectivley replaced. If you look at Dallas, the Lakers, Portland, OKC etc...they all have FIREPOWER. Why wouldnt we stock up on as much firepower as the other teams :confused:
     
  15. adoo

    adoo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2003
    Messages:
    11,808
    Likes Received:
    7,954
    Didn't the Rox jus5t traded away a solid defender at the 3 who can guard at least 2 positions :confused:
     
  16. Kojirou

    Kojirou Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,180
    Likes Received:
    281
    The Thunder and the Lakers have firepower? Really? Those two teams aren't good because of some crazy offense, they're good because they're really good defensive teams, whether due to the Twin Towers of the Lakers or the excellent coaching of Brown.
    Or are you going to bother defining firepower, which we already have a crapton of with Brooks and Martin, whom since will be obviously starting, we could use someone who's really good at defense. Which is not Peja.

    Defense is half the game. Period. You need people whom can play it really well, and help out. Battier can do that. Peja can't. And that's not even getting into Peja's ridiculous salary.
     
  17. Jontro

    Jontro Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2010
    Messages:
    36,290
    Likes Received:
    25,377
    Not a bad idea, OP. Maybe we could use Peja as a kamikaze kinda player. Have him run over and injure LerBon when we meet them in the finals or Kobe when we meet them in the WCF. He'd obviously be banned for life, but 15 mil well spent.
     
  18. rock4ever

    rock4ever Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,257
    Likes Received:
    38
    But we already have Jeffries and Lee. In order for you to win you have to have options. Placing Pedja in a lineup with Yao would automatically give him open 3's. Plus Adelman's system is suited for Pedja.

    The Lakers, OKC, and Dallas have elite players surrounded by tons of offensive options. So does Portland. We dont have a elite talent, so why wouldnt we stock up offensivley? Especially if we already have defensivley capable players................
     
  19. Kojirou

    Kojirou Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,180
    Likes Received:
    281
    I submit that:

    1. The OP proposed trading Battier AND Jeffries, as trading just Battier is impossible. And then we would have absolutely no one who could even remotely guard a SF, as Lee can hardly do that.
    2. Placing Peja in a lineup with Yao would give him open 3s? So? Battier's offense is the 3. And he's not significantly worse as a 3 point shooter either, so frankly, the two as far as we're concerned are pretty much the same offensively. Meaning that since Battier is massively superior defensively and a lot cheaper, trading Battier for Peja is just stupid. I can't believe this has to be explained.
    3. Let's take a look at the Lakers. Fisher is useless, Kobe is a great player whom I respect but is getting up there, Artest is LOL on offense, and you have the two big men. They're a good offensive squad, but they are not an offensive powerhouse.
    The reason the Lakers are still the best team in the league is because of the Gasol-Bynum combo which lets them guard the paint and grab rebounds. Playing inside and defense are the keys to winning rings, which is among other reasons why the Mavs, a soft jump shooting team, always choke. That's how you win. A soft has-been SF who can do absolutely nothing on BOTH ends of the court but fire three's and is paid an insane amount is not what we need.
     
  20. Porksta

    Porksta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    2
    You know, with Peja the Rockets starters would be like 90% from the free throw line.
     

Share This Page