1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Ohhh Gerald!!!!!!

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by Tom Bombadillo, Oct 18, 2008.

  1. v3.0

    v3.0 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,203
    Likes Received:
    931
    Yawn...wake me when he finally does something in the regular season.
     
  2. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,984
    Likes Received:
    39,454
    He did average 10ppg in his 2nd year.....he will do well in Dallas IF...he has matured...if not....he will be out of league soon.

    DD
     
  3. GermanRoxFan

    GermanRoxFan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    37
    yeah, right, super star. and v-span is on his way to be better than steve nash. :rolleyes:

    gerald green might have star potential athletically but if you talk about the basketball player gerald green he's not really a great talent. his shot is pretty inconsistent. his handles are below average. his defense is bad. but his hoops iq and work ethic are just the worst about him.

    he's basically a luther head with a worse shot, worse hoops iq, worse work ethic, worse character but better length and athleticism. so that tells you how much of a talent he really is as a basketball player. ;)

    well, maybe he's good as a high or long jumper or something like that...
     
  4. bejezuz

    bejezuz Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    69
    Gerald Green is smaller, sharp-shooting version of Stromile Swift.
     
  5. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,984
    Likes Received:
    39,454
    Well, I disagree, I think his talent is off the charts, it is his head and lack of maturity that has held him back.

    I guess we shall see.

    DD
     
  6. v3.0

    v3.0 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,203
    Likes Received:
    931
    My bad, clearly that is a sign of a breakout year...
     
  7. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,984
    Likes Received:
    39,454
    At the age of 19, that is not bad......I guess it depends on your expectations....for a 19 year old.

    DD
     
  8. 5KR4TCH

    5KR4TCH Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    4

    yeah dude had a great game

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7FXB-jsNbA4&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7FXB-jsNbA4&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


    ^quality is bad , but eh
     
  9. pmac

    pmac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    8,404
    Likes Received:
    3,266
    ...and there are players that people gush over that can't do that. Take him for what he is but it's annoying to see people act like he's worthless. He's young, he can improve, and he's already shown that he can be an NBA player.
     
  10. IROC it

    IROC it Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 1999
    Messages:
    12,629
    Likes Received:
    89
    Something in his game is just... missing.
     
  11. tinman

    tinman 999999999
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    104,289
    Likes Received:
    47,174
    He's Harold Miner's lost brother.
     
  12. flamingdts

    flamingdts Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2008
    Messages:
    11,630
    Likes Received:
    4,729
    It's probably chemistry. The just seems to be all dunk and scoring, but no team ball. I can't imagine him as a passing player in anyway to be honest, and that alone breaks down RA's offense (which was probably why he didn't work out in Houston). He might excel in team that revolves around him, and he might probably earn a spot in Dallas, but IMO he isn't someone that will bring his passing game (if he has one) even if he is having a shooting night. Also, he doesn't seem like someone that will grab boards or play strong defense.

    He isn't a bad shooter though, in his best season (in the celtics) he shot above 40%, and shot over 80% on the line. He averaged 22 minutes in that season with the celtics, but only averaged 1 assist.. He stands at 6ft 8, but averaged less than 3 rebounds per game. These stats are probably good enough for some teams, but definately not for Rockets.
     
  13. v3.0

    v3.0 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,203
    Likes Received:
    931
    it was a joke, Gerald Green is missing a finger.
     
  14. Shroopy2

    Shroopy2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    16,237
    Likes Received:
    2,019
    ...Oh my bad, thought you were talking about Von wafer for a second.

    You are correct on those points. Though, Wafer is doing those same things (or lack of doing other things) but everyone wants him on the team now. But with Gerald Green, all that stuff was held against him. If Wafer makes the team, there was no reason Gerald Green couldnt have gotten a camp invite imo...
     
  15. LFE171

    LFE171 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,952
    Likes Received:
    19
    QFT man. I was lovin it when we just acquired Green but looking into his stats and his mentality... things just seemed off. Yeah he said he wanted to be like t-mac but the kid is a going to be a future ricky davis. Bone headed guy with crazy skills looking out for himself. Woulda been a dream if he stayed and developed his game, but it's a numbers game and we needed a big body. Oh well.
     
  16. flamingdts

    flamingdts Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2008
    Messages:
    11,630
    Likes Received:
    4,729
    The thing is, Wafer knows his role in the team more than Gerald Green. Since Green played pretty heavy bench minutes, he'd expect an immediate role in the Rockets. But Green lacks team ball in his game, he needs the offense to revolve around him.

    Wafer however, shows that his outside shot is very solid, and he can be a very good clutch player. Green just seems to be a player that cares more about self exposure and stats than winnning. I could be wrong of course, but Green is definately one of those players who'll drive in recklessly into a heavily defended paint.

    This is the exact reason why I think Wafer is a terrific project for the Rockets to work on.
     
  17. cdastros

    cdastros Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    1,924
    Likes Received:
    1,470
    That something is that he is a soft SF. You look around the league, and most teams want their SF's to play some D and rebound along with provide some offense.
     
  18. Shroopy2

    Shroopy2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    16,237
    Likes Received:
    2,019
    This is the kinda reasoning Rudy Tomjanovich used with bringing in guys from the CBA. That they understood their roles and were about fitting in, more appreciative and humble rather than being disruptive hard to coach & all out for themselves... WITH ME , if you can remember Sam Mack yeah he was a decent little role player, but if its Mack or a project with Grant Hill type talent I'm taking a look at the 2nd.

    Can see how Gerald Green would appear to be all about self promotion if he's putting a lot of energy and focus into All Star Weekend and dunk contests rather than his own skills. But Green's allowed to do those things. If he didnt do that would it mean he's more serious about basketball?

    Really, I dont think Gerald Green is even aware what the heck Gerald Green cares about, thats the big problem. It probably took him getting cut from the Rox to figure things out, so he might not have had much tenacity if he stuck around...

    But I wasnt saying Wafer is better or worse or Green's better or worse. Just that the open camp spot and guard position requirements could have easily been filled by Green rather than hiring out.
     
  19. Rockets9495

    Rockets9495 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Messages:
    332
    Likes Received:
    11
    He was let go because he had bad work ethic and was a problem off the court as well. It would be shocking to see him ever be a good player on a team that matters.
     
  20. dookiester

    dookiester Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,829
    Likes Received:
    599
    this is just straight ignorant talk. green has a great jumper. his skills individually are all superior to luther head. he's got better handles than luther considering his height. they both suck at passing. green's problem isn't his skillset, its his mental game, which CAN improve.

    i find it ironic that so many people continually defend luther head by saying he's still young and can improve. why don't people give green the same benefit of the doubt? he's 4 years younger than luther head.

    ill be rooting for green big time to have a good year and prove all the naysayers wrong who assume, just because he got cut, he doesn't have the skills necessary to be a good player in the league. he's got all the tools, he just needs to put them together. it's not as improbable as many of you seem to wish it to be.
     

Share This Page