hahaha david Sacks. Do you always quote the biggest ****ing losers in the world as your evidence. Jesus christ David sacks?! The funny thing about your dipshit conspiracies is TRUMPS OWN CABINET MEMBERS stated that there was no widespread fraud in 2020. His own intel chiefs and his own cybersecurity experts stated there was no fraud and have repeatedly said so out of office. At some point you dipshit MAGATs will wake up and realize youre in a cult. You can scream as loud as you want that there was fraud in 2020 but it doesnt make any of your braindead conspiracies true.
You can keep claiming whatever conspiracy makes you sleep better at night but no matter how loud you yell it makes none of it true. No state democractic party tried to remove trump off the ballot. A group of republicans sued the state to remove him. MAGA turds literally live in an alternate world where facts dont matter to them. They think they can just scream as loud as they want and it'll make things true. Hilarious
Why would the Democrats need to worry about polls, or Colorado for that matter, when Trump has proven how easily they rig elections? Spoiler
Well, looks like Maine is going to remove him too - it is funny how the democrats have to clean up after all the republican messes, in the economy, in their choice of party leader, everywhere, they have to clean up the messes the Republicans make... DD
I heard an interesting comment. Was that for all the talk by Trump and his supporters about this taking away the choice from voters and a threat to democracy was that Trump and many of those supporters wanted to remove Obama’s name from the ballot and office on whether he was constitutionally qualified. If I recall correctly some of the very posters here making a big stink about Trump being constitutionally qualified were some of the loudest voices arguing that Obama should’ve been Constitutionally disqualified.
That's because none of those people actually care about the Constitution. The law is just as much a "living document" to them as they accuse liberals of, but their interpretation of it is self-serving and regressive.
Well, of course, it's more for thee but not for me. It wasn't that long ago, so his supporters should still remember these unless, of course, selective amnesia is a skill set they've mastered. Birther. It started with Obama and proceeded to Ted Cruz. Of course, 'birther' was a conspiracy theory without any evidence and was completely political, whereas Jan6 is right in your face and is now an absolutely legal case to be settled by the SCOTUS (unless, for some crazy reason, they reject to take the case) ps. @Trader_Jorge is still a birther in 2023, lol.
I just don’t get this. Would you woke Democrats in here shed some lights for me? Every time you guys go after Trump, he shoots way up in the polls. Remember Alvin Braggs? Trump has been ascending ever since Alvin the pig indicted him. This latest stunt to keep him off the ballot in Colorado will only jettisoned him into another stratosphere. If I don’t know any better, I think you guys are helping Trump to be our next president?
There are millions more Americans who dislike him than support him. He won in 2016 by a few thousand votes. Every subsequent election where Trump has been on the ballot, real or perceived, he's been a total loser.
The liberal states attempt to take Trump off the ballot is not going to work. Someone not charged or convicted of “insurrection” …it won’t stand, Here’s what’s going to happen it’s not going to stand and Trump is going to win the Presidency and I honestly I’d rather see someone else from the Republican side but the Democrats are going to be their own worst enemy on this.
Democrats didn't bring a suit to keep Trump off the ballot. Most Democrats know their best chance to win in 2024 is to run against Trump. But it isn't surprising that you don't get it. Democrats are able to put country over party and believe that someone who is a wannabe dictator isn't good for the country.
Sure, they will and that's their right. I wish not so many people were gleeful about it because I expect it to blow up in democracy's face. I don't see why not. But he couldn't be sworn in if he won. Don't know if electors could even cast votes for him. Not my job to play reverse psychology on the yokels to game the election. If you want to blow the place up, have at it.
Hypothetical question: If Trump gets disqualified - who do you think even gets the Republican nomination? DeSantis? Haley? Or even Vivek? I could see DeSantis having pissed off the Trump base too much already.
My Trump loving relatives seem to want Trump in 2024 and DeSantis in 2028. I think they might view Haley as more ready for "primetime" right now than DeSantis, but I could be wrong. I don't know that they're really that upset by DeSantis. Christie on the other hand...
Yeah, I'm thankful for each and every one of them and what I've learned from them over the years, both good and not so good, but I'm not thrilled about it. Really hard to blame them fully when Fox, Limbaugh and the like, and so many in their circle are selling them overly simple "solutions" to complex problems. Guess it helps not to judge, but it's hard not to sometimes (as I'm sure they would tell you about me, lol.)
Most Democrats are terrifying at the thoughts of having Brandon as their candidate. It isn’t surprising that you don’t get it. Check your polls lately? Brandon has lost almost all demographics.
