What was your previous user name? Do a search on user "SamFisher" and "Boki" or "Nachbar" and you will find at least one poster who tripped over himself putting Nachbar down.
If you want to be sorry, go ahead. Again, I disagree with you about your opinion about me. I am sorry that you are sorry but feel free to be as sorry as most of your arguments.
He can be broadcaster FOR A WEEK it doesnt matter my point is he does not appeal to many houston rocket fans...hes very dull and boring and is just bill worrells puppet..reapeating everything bill says...im sorry matt is a good person but horrible broadcaster
I like that thought. Additionally, I don't mind disagreeing and learning as long as the person that I disagree with or learn from seems to know what they are talking about and/or presents could arguments. I, honestly, have not seen much of that so far in here. On the other hand, I have seen some members that seem knowledgable and/or can present good arguements.
Wow, you were so, so extremely far off on that point. Worrell greatest attribute is that he is incredibly sharp in his analysis and displays a clear-cut higher bball IQ than Worrell. Worrell is the more polished broadcaster, overall, but Bullard is a far better basketball analyst/broadcaster/announcer. Honestly, I am not surprised you feel so differently about Worrell as an announcer given you other weak and off-base arguments on other topics. Bullard does not, by any means, repeat everything Worrell says. At times, he will reinforce his points but anybody who knows basketball and has watched the two announce, even if just for a few games, knows how much of a better basketball analyst Bullard is. Wow, you were so wrong about that point. The boring part is more of a matter of opinion so I wouldn't question that. point
Wow, you were so, so extremely far off on that point. Bullard's (replacing Worrell from the last post) greatest attribute is that he is incredibly sharp in his analysis and displays a clear-cut higher bball IQ than Worrell. Worrell is the more polished broadcaster, overall, but Bullard is a far better basketball analyst/broadcaster/announcer. Honestly, I am not surprised you feel so differently about Worrell as an announcer given you other weak and off-base arguments on other topics. Bullard does not, by any means, repeat everything Worrell says. At times, he will reinforce his points but anybody who knows basketball and has watched the two announce, even if just for a few games, knows how much of a better basketball analyst Bullard is. Wow, you were so wrong about that point. The boring part is more of a matter of opinion so I wouldn't question that.
BTW, how long have you been a Rockets game and how many games do you attend or watch each year? How many games did you attend/watch last season? I am looking for an explanation for your poor arguments.
BTW, how long have you been a Rockets fan (not game) and how many games do you attend or watch each year? How many games did you attend/watch last season? How long have you been following basketball and the NBA? I am looking for an explanation for your poor arguments.
You seriously need to chill out. Look at yourself: SIX posts in a row, a couple of which are edits to your rage-induced rants that you couldn't initially make coherent. All over MATT BULLARD?!? This thread's about Steve Francis.
I will accept that the topic was astray considering this thread is about Francis. That point I accept.
By the way, Fuzzy "The Racist" Zoeller, there is no rage on my end. You seem to be the one that is all wound up.
You have officially reached your posting limit on this thread. Your posting has successfully made this stick'em thread garbage. Any future posting by you shall result in direct WHACKS! to your brooksballs.
Wells for today's boki?. i'm gonna give Adelman a shot at wells first. if he replicates 70% of the same success he had with him sacrament i wouldnt trade wells left nuts for boki. A motivated wells is a top 30 to 40 player in this league.
this off season has been so memorable ... as a fan I'm really hoping we can place a competitive team in the mix. my instinct is SF can be part of that mix, but if not? "we" lose 2.5 mil of Les' money. i just don't see how yah can turn your back on the SF deal and then pretend you're "trying" to improve the rockets.
