I have Josh Gordon as a better value (from now on) then Steve Smith so I would easily take the deal as long as you have someone to drop worse than Hillman. Else ask for something besides Hillman that you can use.
i don't. I think smith is better than gordon, but I do think hillman has some value going forward so the deal is basically even.
Start: Jared Cook, Mike Floyd, Ed Lacy, J Nelson, R Mathews Sit: Roddy, Torrey Smith, Mike Wallace, MJD, Mark Ingram
I think I'm going to bench wright for doug baldwin. While I do think sf d is great, I could see baldwin getting a lot of short yardage targets as the hot reciever.
Had this same problem today... went with Wilson in a league, Richardson in the other... it's time to pickup Pead btw.
I have Richardson and picked up Pead last week. I'm going to hold on to Pead for one more week, but if he gets no PT in week 3, I'll probably drop him.
if andre ellington is out there, get this guy. while he might not get you 30, I see him as a solid flex play at running back, and he could turn into even more if mendenhall gets hurt.
Send Trent Richardson, Cle RB from RB to $$$$ Send Julius Thomas, Den TE from Bench to $$$$ Receive Vincent Jackson, TB WR from $$$$ to Bench Receive Jordy Nelson, GB WR from $$$$ to Bench Receive Ahmad Bradshaw, Ind RB from $$$$ to Bench I'm the receiver, should I do it? 10 man 1.0 ppr
are you going by points or talent? to me, you are giving away too much talent. the question you have to ask yourself, would I do this deal before the season began? if the answer is yes, do the deal. If the answer is no, then I don't believe 2 weeks is enough to determine a season. the problem with dealing richardson right now is that first, cleveland's wr core hasn't scared anybody thus far without Josh Gordon running routes, so once gordon comes back, that should open up some lanes for trent. second, norv turner is still learning how to use his offensive weapons and I suspect that going forward richardson is going to be better. I mean, if you are losing every week, you might have to make a move. But if you do, get some quality value more than you are getting. If i were going to do a deal for richardson, i'd be looking at say, Jimmy Graham or even Gronk + a guy like Lamar Miller, at least you'd have a positional advantage. Or maybe even looking at Sam Bradford + Jarrod Cook. Don't deal away a stud rd for a wr, when wr are a time a dozen. You need to hold onto your potential positional advantage so I'd be targeting a top flight qb (bradford + cook or tavon austin or chris givens) for richardson would be an ideal move, imo.
Actually, I think the trade you've proposed is much worse than what he has on the table right now, haha.
Well, I think Bradford is in for a big year and if you can get him with one of his top targets that is a bonus. I'm looking far more at the position than I am about the overall talent. The wr position is diluted with a bunch of good depth, so loading up on talent there is a waste in my opinion. a bradford - cook trade would be ideal because you got 2 players at positions that don't have a lot of great stars, despite what experts say about the qb position.
I'm an MJD owner. I'm deep at WR: green, Garçon, shorts, M. Austin and Decker. I have two offers for Decker. One is for Frank Gore One is for Chris Johnson Should I take any of thspese trades? If so, which one? Fred Jackson, Moreno, Mendenhall and Bradshaw are all on waiver. Would these guys be a better option? I would drop Cook or Miles Austin (I have Gonzo) Full PPR
