1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Official] Raiders @ Texans PREGAME

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by Castor27, Oct 4, 2011.

  1. droopy421

    droopy421 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    2,280
    Likes Received:
    184
    Texans 31
    Raiders 24

    Stopping the run is key.
     
  2. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,604
    Likes Received:
    3,487
    They shouldn't but the Raiders are scaring me. They will definitely test the Texans' run defense and their WRs speed is a bit scary.

    Not having AJ obviously keeps them less honest in the passing game so that line of scrimmage is going to be seeing a lot of congestion. The fact that the Pats shredded them on the ground is a good sign, but i'm sure the raiders were more concerned with stopping the pass.

    If Jacoby doesnt have a good game now, then ...then hell, time to spend a 1st or 2nd round pick on a WR
     
  3. torque

    torque Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,964
    Likes Received:
    1,237
    I want to see tons of play action passes to Daniels and lots of screen passes to Foster and Casey. I think they're gonna stack the box with Andre out, and that's the way to beat them. Their secondary is trash, I wouldn't mind running Arian on routes downfield too. Time for Jacoby to step up.
     
  4. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    While the pass rush has come around, I'm still not confident in the Texans ability to stop the run. I expect McFadden to get consistent yardage. I just hope we can stop him from breaking any huge runs, and Foster breaks a couple of them himself. If that happens, we can force the Raiders into field goal attempts and that would win the game.

    I'm pretty excited about this game, though. It's a pass-happy league now, but you have two teams that like to line up and run the ball down your throat (and do a pretty good job of it). If you're a fan of offensive linemen and blocking schemes, this is your game.
     
  5. liljojo

    liljojo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    3,423
    Likes Received:
    227
    I don't know how scheduling works, but doesn't it feel like we play the Raiders every year? I know we've played them at least 4 years in a row...
     
  6. marks0223

    marks0223 2017 and 2022 World Series Champions
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    11,878
    Likes Received:
    17,442
    They've both been finishing in the same place in their respective divisions. When a team finishes in 1st place, then the next year they have to play the other AFC teams that finished in first place, etc.
     
  7. DieHard Rocket

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2000
    Messages:
    9,413
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    This is the 6th straight year we've played the Raiders. We're 5-1 all time against them.

    Other than the '08 debacle, IIRC the score has always been closer than the game really went. We usually control the game pretty well against these guys, and I expect this to be no different. They are a decent football team but there is no excuse for losing to them.
     
  8. moestavern19

    moestavern19 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 1999
    Messages:
    39,003
    Likes Received:
    3,641
    Umm, the Raiders haven't run a 3-4 since the 90s.

    Tidbits:

    The Raiders Run Defense is not as bad as the stats make it look, basically they're Jeckyl and Hyde. They can shut down a very good running back one week, then get gashed left and right by mediocre backs the next.

    The defensive line is stout, but if the LBs can't fill gaps and make tackles, they'll stand no chance. If Foster makes one cut and Rolando McClain still has his head up his ass, then it'll be a long day.

    They are a talented but very, very poorly disciplined defense, they will commit stupid penalties, not be in their correct gaps to make tackles, and flat out miss tackles and blow coverages.

    The Secondary is ripe for the picking right now, Stanford Routt is a good cover corner and has basically assumed the Asomugha role in the defense, but the other corners are rookies and practice squad fodder.

    Offensively they are a very different team from the years past. They will throw in a mix of run and pass. Loads of play action. The Offensive line isn't very celebrated by any means, but they've been able to protect Campbell very well so far this season. They will try and run McFadden early and often, and throw in some reverses to either Denarius Moore or Jacoby Ford to keep the defense guessing.

    None of the receivers are consistent, but usually one out of the 3-4 guys they have will receive a majority of targets. Last week it was Heyward-Bey, against the Bills it was Denarius Moore. Derek Hagan is a possession receiver who they'll look for on 3rd downs to convert.

    FB Marcel Reece (If he's healthy) is a dangerous weapon in the passing game because he's a converted WR. If he plays, they will use him off play action in the red zone and try and get him isolated against a slower LB, a matchup he usually wins.

    The Raiders rarely look to throw it at all in the Red Zone. After last week where Jason Campbell throw a perfect pass right to Patrick Chung you probably understand why. None of their Receivers are red zone targets and even when they had Zach Miller they never looked for him in the red zone. Kevin Boss has a good Red Zone history with the Giants.

    Usually in the redzone they will just try to run it down your throat with Bush.

    Healthy dose of McFadden between the 20s, then Bush the goalline back.


    I think the Raiders will not be able to stop Arian Foster all day, and continue to self-destruct all over the field.

    They were 2-8 vs teams outside their division last year and don't play well on the road.

    Texans will probably win comfortably.
     
    #28 moestavern19, Oct 4, 2011
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2011
  9. Uprising

    Uprising Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2000
    Messages:
    43,076
    Likes Received:
    6,603
    Can't wait.

    Texans win at home by 14.
     
  10. Maximus

    Maximus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    279
    Likes Received:
    17
    Texans control the game with Foster beasting.

    Foster: Australian for **** YOU MOES!



    Run DMC: 0
    Foster: OVER 9,000!!!!
     
    1 person likes this.
  11. Maximus

    Maximus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    279
    Likes Received:
    17

    Oh. Well then...carry on.
     
  12. tmacfor35

    tmacfor35 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    24,000
    Likes Received:
    14,673
    Stop the running game. And we win. We have a good defense and for the first time this year, our team will focus on stopping the run.

    There run defense is awful and secondary is just as bad. We should win this game if our defense comes to play.
     
  13. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    If you're right, this is promising to me (for the Texans). It sounds like they can stop good backs if they can get penetration with the D-Line, but their linebackers can't make up the difference if they can't. I'm starting to agree with the growing sentiment that the Texans have the best O-Line in the game, especially for run blocking. I think they can get Foster to the second-level on anyone. If Oakland can't stop him with their linebackers and safeties, he could go for 200.
     
  14. solid

    solid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2001
    Messages:
    21,229
    Likes Received:
    9,066
    If the Texans "let up" they will lose and lose big; if they "come to play," stay focused, and go all out (blah, blah...) they will win and win big. This is not an open date! The home team is in the "snooze you lose" part of the schedule. Next week is war. Can't afford to lose this one. MUST go into Baltimore 4-1, have to.
     
  15. the futants

    the futants Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    5,157
    Likes Received:
    175
    Thanks, Moes.

    I hope the Texans can handle "success" and not let off the gas. Losing Andre hurts, but we've beaten them with him in the past.

    Buena suerte, Tejanos!
     
  16. Two Sandwiches

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    23,136
    Likes Received:
    15,078
    This game should be a win for the Texans. This should be the game where the offense finally puts it all together. Should be the game where Schaub and company put their foot on the gas and don't let up.


    But for some reason, I feel like it's a classic Texans set up for disappointment. Let's hope I'm wrong and something is different this year.


    Raiders 24
    Texans 17
     
  17. rezdawg

    rezdawg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    I'll take the Raiders at +6.

    This will be a tough game IMO.
     
  18. Miguel

    Miguel Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2003
    Messages:
    5,625
    Likes Received:
    140
    Stat to keep an eye on...


    Most Yards Gained Rushing, Both Teams, Game
    595 Yards

    Los Angeles Rams (371)
    vs.
    New York Yanks (224)

    Nov. 18, 1951

    If any game is going to have this broken, this could be it.
     
  19. javal_lon

    javal_lon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    11,753
    Likes Received:
    9,674
    Hopefully Al Davis will be callin the plays again from the sky box.... This Raiders rushing assault wont last too much longer... Al losin it watchin all that runnin... I think this is the week, Campbell attempts 50 passes
     
  20. emjohn

    emjohn Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    12,132
    Likes Received:
    567
    This week has the makings of a trap game: big win at home, Raiders a little better than they "should be", easy to look forward to Baltimore and have the W penciled in prematurely....

    Hopefully, a silver lining of Andre's hamstring is that the team will be looking to step up in his absence.

    I'm hopeful we'll get Tate back and be able to get the dynamic duo going.

    Defense will get its toughest test against the run. I'm more impressed with them each week, and hopefully the front 7 put McFadden on the pain train.

    I'm cautiously optimistic that Casey and OD (and Foster) pave the way with a short passing game.

    I think we're looking at another low scoring one, which means winning the turnover battle will be critical.

    I'll say 23-16, good guys.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now