1) The leaders can't privatize their mineral wealth and fail to create lasting infrastructure or economic opportunities or identities for restive young men. 2) Governments are monarchical and hereditary, which forces people to organize along tribal lines. 3) In the '60s and '70s, all the newsreels about sexual empowerment, secularization and women's rights were accidentally played in reverse.
Don't follow and know. Safe to said it's has something to do with hatred. The "bible" of Buddhism (pali canon is as close as you get to it) is very clear on it takes on violence. Almost always, violence is never the way simply because it's not effective and will come back and harm you. There may be a very few exceptions that pertain to self defense or defense of others - I'm not sure. However, in my reading, I know that Buddhism historically has had violence. Not anywhere to the level of Christianity and Islam, but nevertheless it has violence in its history. So how come a religion that hold non-violence so highly can have violence. If you look at how, where, when, you then get a clearer picture of it. Culture, society, type of government all play a part. Looking back at the "how much violence" is in a religious text might provide some answers and clues, but it's never the only factor to how practitioners of those religions behave. At any instance of time, there can be many other factors that are much more significant. The "violence" in these text are of course constantly and will continue to be used by extremists to excuse their actions. That's not going to change but eventually, if history hold, and I believe it will, there will be less and less of them. How many of them depends greatly on environment. Sadly, the current environment for many Muslim in some regions is one that yield today Islamic terrorists and backward behaviors that many other religious and non-religious regions have long rid off. In today society, I'm of the take that Muslim people of those regions needs to grow up than the religion of those regions needs to change (for you aren't going to change religion, but you can change culture and government).
