Did you make a lot of excuses growing up? Do you continue to for the reasons you are where you are? i don't like foster, he is a **** reff but lol at you acting like he's a big reason we lost. If not for foster we may have lost to the CP3 thunder genius. This is why you're the idiot people kinda just laugh at and feel sorry for
Foster is "A" reason nimrod, pay attention. But you have proven to be incapable of reading AND comprehending so I may be asking too much of you.
If you weren't attached to AD's scrotum, you would be able to see that the early fouls on PJ played a part on how aggressive Tucker could defend AD in the 1st half.
Tucker picked up his 2nd foul on an AD and-1 with 5:14 left in the first quarter. By then, AD already had 10 pts so your assertion is incorrect. The Lakers made a concerted effort to get the ball into AD's hands last night. There's a reason his FGA went way up and his teammates' went way down. It wasn't a coincidence.
How is it ignorance? I'm not talking about winning/losing. I'm talking about AD's involvement in the Laker offense. Unsurprisingly, you're having reading comprehension issues again. After game 1, I said that the Lakers weren't playing to win because they weren't utilizing him. You said that we had the ultimate Lakers killer and that he struggled because of our elite defense. Lo and behold, in game 2, AD's involvement spiked up tremendously. In other words, you were wrong.
LOL Notice patterns here? No AD in top 10 offensive PIPM list. Harden is #3. Lebron is #10. And 3 Rockets (RoCo, PJ, Harden) in top 7 defensive PIPM. PJ is so good he's mentioned twice.
You were clearly wrong. Anyone who watched both games knows this. Why are you so determined to make yourself look foolish? Just admit the obvious.....that AD was far more involved in the Lakers offense in game 2.
