It wasn't an overaction and I don't want or need your pity. And I do have a right to speak on behalf of my son. You can save the name calling. Being on the internet doesn't have a damn thing to do with this. Another person who can't figure out that sarcasm didn't have a damn thing to do with this. If I ran around dropping N bombs around this place and said I was just being sarcastic, I'd be tossed in a minute. Your best course of action is sit back read your own posts in this threasd and realize how ignorant they are.
look i'm going to just ignore the part about your son except we should all be more careful his point was that ignorant people who would execute anyone would be ignorant enough to call them r****ds. no one supports anyone calling someone a r****d. but thanks for responding in a non offensive manner.
You seem to have the same comprehension problems that FranchiseBlade has. Actually you both support George W Bush's actions of targeting Al Qaeda in Pakistan, which he has done. I was opposed to Barack running his mouth about it to the press. That's BO's foreign relations immaturity showing through, right there. George W Bush just goes and does it without being stupid enough to run his mouth in the press like BO did
I was merely saying I'm sorry for the situation. If you can't accept that, fine. The point is you reacted in an abrasive fashion when all that was required was you saying that you found that to be offensive in a civil manner. Instead you chose to be a jerk about it. I'm sure the guy meant no offense in his original post on the matter to people who actually have a handicap. It's you who can't see the fact that he was actually making fun of the type of people who would actually use that word. I also don't need your advice on my best course of action.
who ran their mouth off when it was reported that it happened? oh i guess its okay when the administration is celebrating their successes.
Another weak non-relevant response from Pgabriel. You obviously supported it by coming up with that pitiful attempt at justifying jugdish's comment. And thank you for another nonsense filled post.
better to beg for forgiveness than ask permission. Obama doesn't need to be floating our plans out to the press ahead of time - that's dumb
HUH? Didnt Bush advertise to the world that he wanted go after Sadaam; before he actuall went after Sadaam??? So how can you say Bush just does it. In the case of Pakistan he just did it, before that he was as guilty as anyone about advertising what he "would" do. You accuse him (Obama) of being weak on terror, when he has never been in position of being "the man" when its time to call the shot. How can you honestly label him "weak on terror" up to this point? **Side Note** We all know who lacks comprehension around here. So chill with the personal attacks.
dude, now i'm gonna be a jerk, you're using your son's illness just to get off another nonsense filled anti obama supporter rant.
and yes, i support the sarcasm, but as already explained by three people, it was an insult to people who use that language
When you post something that sounds like you meant to say you're sorry, I'd gladly accept that. That would be your opinion of the situation. And like I told the original poster. What he said had no class. And that's twice you've called me a name. Are you sure are the guy who needs to lecture my posting style? I was returning the favor.
You can't just slip in hundreds of thousands of troops like you can target AQ in Pakistan. Apples and oranges, brah. Silly example. BO cozying up to Iran's psychotic president, wanting to cut and run in Iraq when we're whipping AQ to shreds, reducing our missile spending, reducing general military spending, etc. Tell me how any of that is tough on terror. It's not.
Someone should really report this trash to the mods. Attacking his autistic son and defending the use of the word 'r****d' after you found out he has an autistic son is one of the worst things I've EVER read on this BBS. Especially coming from the BBS' chief victim-card player.
Again HUH??? That was not US policy until recently and may I remind you after his statement. He spoke in terms of "If he was president"... However you'd make it a catch 22 for Obama eitherway. If he would have said, "No comment" to the question when it was asked, you would have used it as proof later to call him (like your doing now) weak on terror. Look we all know you would be behind J. McCain even if Jesus himself came back and declared himself a DEM. With that being the case, just say you dont like Obama and your not voting for him. I could respect that way more than all the negative propaganda you push about him day in and day out.. Sheesh....
Give me a break. It was already explained that the term was not used in a derogatory manner. Furthermore, Ill-Skillz brought it on himself. He could have simply said "That's not cool I have an autistic son" and I guarantee it would have ended there. Instead, he chose to be abrasive about it.
