NO UR A LIAR remember that one time in 1994 on the DOS version of ClutchBBS when you said you did not support gay rights but then you gave me an erotic massage?! oh wait ... that might have been DaDakota.
i dont have a problem w/ either "problems" that obama has. i have a problem w/ obama calling for an immediate withdrawl from iraq. this idea is impractical and would have serious implications on the stability of the middle east. i can agree w/ a gradual partial withdrawl but i feel that we have to maintain some kind of presence over there. if you want to post something of concern about obama, lets make sure there is some merit to it. not just some quote taken out of context or some questionable interpretation of events which are viewed through partisan glasses.
I guess erotic massage means "foot in the ass" where you come from, which is probably some place with a lot of nazis. you stink like poop.
No matter who the Democratic nominee is, voters need to be on the lookout for dirty tricks, especially during the general election. Republicans will be very likely to hold off on the really nasty lies about Obama/Hillary/whoever until the nomination is secured. They attacked Kerry on his war record, of all things; I'm sure they'll try some equally baseless attack this time around. And with a press that seems to believe that its job is to equally report both sides of every dispute, rather than actually investigate to see who's telling the truth, I'm afraid it might work again.
I guess "foot in the ass" means "sensual stroking of the groinular regions for the low low price of $18.95" where you come from, which is probably a secular humanist summer camp where they teach you to hide dirty pictures in elementary school textbooks! WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?! (and no, not in the dirty way that YOU think of them) That is not poop that you smell, it is SUCCESS.
I think it's pretty obvious that Obama only joined a church for political reasons - which is understandable. I'm sure that most politicians only pretend to believe in God, just as most people do. Most people believe that it's important to believe in God, which is different from actually believing in God. Does Mitt actually believe that God came from Uranus to give him special underwear? He's mildly intelligent, so probably not. He probably hopes that there is a God, but again, that's different from actually believing it. BTW, Obama rhymes with Yo Mama, so I am voting for him.
Politicians get MARRIED and have children for political reasons. How many politicians have mustaches? That's what I thought
ignoring the rest of your post, which is equally idiotic, but if you think republicans are more likely to vote against obama than the othe potential dem nominees, then you haven't been paying attention. if it's a huckabee/obama race, and if the election were today, the likelihood of significant crossover voting for obama is much greater, than in a huckabee/hillary race (in which case, i'd just shoot myself, putting the d&d out of it's misery). of course, i think it's not unlikely we don't know the republican nominee for quite sometime, perhaps until after the convention. there are five viable candidates- i'm not happy about all of them. and the one who seems to have "lost" the first two ("important") contests, actually leads the delegate count, and has virtually unlimited resources (i'm not necessarily pleased about that fact. so, if huck isn't the nominee- the above calculation doesn't apply, except that the ABC vote is far greater than the Pro-O vote.
I don't know if my view would be considered the majority one here, but the fact that Obama could be an atheist makes me respect him even more. People who blindly follow religion scare me a little. As for the "black" church, I bet a white person would be embraced, not turned away, if he/she decided to visit the church.
naw, he stopped snorting for that reason. man this could go on forever... the D&D is starting to turn into tabloid news...
Then you agree with Obama. He calls for removing one to two combat brigades per month (gradual withdrawal), while leaving troops to protect our diplomats and embassy as well as troops to carry out targeted attacks on Al Qaeda if they try to set up a base in Iraq (some kind of presence).
i could compromise w/ a gradual withdrawl with a remaining contingent of troops to guard the embassy and carry out raids on terrorists groups w/in iraq. but i honestly think youll need a sizeable presence to realistically protect the embassy and carry out raids. however, 1-2 combat brigades per month. that seems like a pretty rapid withdrawl. think of all the equiptment and the support personel who are attached to the brigades. thats a logistical headache. sadly enough we'd probably have to go back in a few years down the road bc the iraqis inability to establish a strong central government.
Frankly, I think all the Democrats are ultimately going to change positions on Iraq. Its easy to campaign on getting the hell out, but the reality when they get into office is not going to be the same. This is always the case in Presidential campaigns - historically, we've had tons of people run on isolationism or pulling back or whatever. Bush was all about getting away from nation-building and getting out of the Israel/Palestinian conflict, etc. It just doesn't work that way. We may very well withdraw from primary combat operations in Iraq - but there's no way in hell we'll withdraw from having a major military presence and having to be involved. It may have been a mistake to go in, but we're there and stuck there.
i agree. bush jumped both feet into quicksand. now we're waist deep. its gonna be tough getting out of this one. (btw, you can climb out of quicksand. i saw it on man vs wild)
