The sad thing RF_15 is that the graphic is not a joke. It is the sad reality. Guess which nominee supports and will foster this plutocratic division of wealth for the 1%? Unless you are set to inherit a parental fortune, you may be voting against your best interest.
Well, the economy is doing just fine! He's also delivered a health care plan that everybody embraces and loves, and has dramatically boosted food stamp spending. He's closed Guantanamo Bay, too. I could go on!
8% unemployment for nearly 4 years, $5 trillion in debt, a health care plan that is unconstitutional, and dare I mention Fast and Furious?
I was listening to the Hannity radio show (because I hate myself) on a trip to Dallas a few months ago and they had a child, like 8 or 9 years old, rattling off vague talking points. You sound exactly like him.
http://lerageshirts.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/400x462/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/y/a/yao-ming-shirt-meme-t-shirt-rage-face-yaoming-le-rage-shirts-b****-please-2_1.jpg
If the debt is your thing.....how can you embrace a candidate who's committed to further tax reductions and a significant increase in military spending before he even has a chance to assess how 'bad' it is? His plans for balancing the budget are very long term. His plans to increase the deficit are immediate. couple of bits of light reading for you: http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinio...2-07/Romney-Obama-balancing-budget/53003740/1 http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion...ey-defense-spending-20120624,0,6596765.column Even in his heyday as a corporate raider, he'd be hard pressed to turn a troubled company around if he was forbidden from making adjustments to the revenue stream and committed to adding new expenditures. I'm not anti-Romney -- but while he may decrease spending (military notably excluded), deficit reduction is simply not realistic for him given the way he's boxed himself in so far.
No troll here! I like to debate! If that is what you call trolling, perhaps you shouldn't be in this thread!
