Obama in 2001, Wealth Redistribution, Warren Court

it must really suck to be arguing that obama's a socialist when under the guy you've supported for eight years we're about to BUY INTO BANKS WITH GOVERNMENT MONEY

 

Yes, we saw the mindless “socialism” attacks in 1992 against Clinton when he was in a tight race against the first Bush. And look what happened when we elected that Socialist Clinton, a surplus and the greatest US economic expansion in decades.

 

You know we have a progressive tax system right?

 

also found on the drudge.......

Study: Farts Reduce Blood Pressure.

<b>The Stink in Farts Controls Blood Pressure</B>

Digg Facebook Newsvine del.icio.us Reddit StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Bookmarks Print Amelia Tomas
LiveScience Staff
LiveScience.com amelia Tomas
livescience Staff
livescience.com – Thu Oct 23, 3:21 pm ET

 

Yes I do which means automatic redistribution of the wealth.

 

I think Obama is going to be much more of a "Socialist" than Clinton. And Clinton didn't balance the budget by himself.

 

So are you saying McCain is going to make the tax system no longer progressive?

 

but it did get balanced unlike the first six years of all republican rule

 

My point is Obama isn't Clinton, and he is not going to balance the budget, he is not even pretending he is going to. People keep bring up Clinton when arguing about Obama as if somehow voting Dem would somehow automatically bring back the Clinton days.

 

why are they so different? and of course he can't balance the budget, its too much of a mess to clean up the previous eight years. the fact you keep leaving out

 

I can already see the excuses being made, just blame everything on Bush. This might work for a couple years, not 4.

 

No, that's why I'm saying McCain is going to be redistributing the wealth as well.

 

no excuse, $1,000,000,000,000 in bailouts is fact that whoever is the next pres is gonna have to clean up because of irresponisble fiscal policy over the last eight years

do you disagree?

 

I think when talking about taxes they bring up Clinton because Obama's tax rates won't be different than they were under Clinton. It makes sense when talking about taxes.

 

We've done that for years, now. The Bush administration carried this torch, too...and has been commended for it by people from all over the political spectrum.

World poverty, for some, is also an issue of national security....to me it's an issue of, "i'm more concerned with human beings than lines in the sand."

 

It will be different.

 

So this subprime mess is because of irresponsible fiscal policy and Bush's fault?

 

yes, flooding the market with money lowering interest rates so people will buy their way out of recession after 9-11 was an actual bush policy.

do you disagree?

 

Bush sets the interest rates? And you think interest rate is the biggest cause of our current problems?

 

no, people buying homes they can't afford with the cheap money provided, wall street buying up these mortgages, unregulated (republican mantra) derivatives associated with these products.

do you disagree?