lol the more people find out about Hussein Ubama, the more they will discover that he's substance-lacking. Now he's not even coming up with original content for his already substance-lacking speeches? Good grief. All he is now is a good deliverer of a speech. Nothing more. Once again, the half-black Joel Osteen. Nothing more.
April 16, 2007: http://www.boston.com/news/nation/a...trick_obama_campaigns_share_language_of_hope/ December 21, 2007 http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/12/obama-scoffs-th.html I thought Hillary was all about substance? How is this at all substantive? It's pathetic, really.
This is the part of the race where TJ, and bigtexxx show their fear of Obama by throwing out stories like this where Obama wasn't stealing anything from Deval, and unsubstantiated rumors because they are afraid and need to do something to stop the source of that fear asap.
Yes or no: Would you like a president who copies speeches, takes crack and likes to have a dude suck on his weiner?
It isn't copying speeches if you have permission to use them. I'll wait until there is something more substantial than one dude with wild claims to even comment on the stupid limo ride story.
He copied it plain as day. Who cares if he had permission? He copied it. He used the same words, which means "copied".
I'm not saying he broke any laws - I don't really care. It's plain as day that he used the same words, though. I saw both speeches, brah
LOL, I been saying for month that Obama was a carbon copy of Deval Patrick, now Obama is literally copying Deval word for word? All the liberals better hope Obama is a lot better on the job, because if he is anything like Deval, we will all be in a world of hurt. (its pretty scary to think that Deval #2 might become the most powerful person in the world)
It's even scarier to think that he might be the most powerful person in the world, and on crack while receiving a hummer from a dude. At least when Slick Willie got serviced it was by a chick
You compared the same act and made it obvious that the same act can be judged worse if done in a homosexual manner. Your bigotry has been made clear. Your statement there is is like saying I don't dislike such and such a race, but I just don't approve of their actions or their hair, or some other insignificant.
I just said that I don't approve of homosexual acts. Got it? It's not bigotry, it's disapproval of the acts. your attempt at smearing me has been thwarted. Sorry brah
You may disapprove of the acts, but it is bigotry when you disapprove the acts from homosexuals but not heterosexuals. It is the same act. But when one group does it, it is worse to you than when others do it. That's textbook bigotry.
How can anyone not say that this is a blatant rip off of Patrick's speech? What does this tell you about Obama's character when he tries to pass off something as his own when it's not? For a man noted for his way with words, this is a direct assault on his main strength.
