First I accept your apology. Second, I stand corrected. I relied upon the OP for providing the truth and I should have listened to the entire segment by Carlson. Third, I never believed that Russia and the President sat down and discussed a plan to collude. Rather what happened was felons like Roger Stone were provided information and benefited from Russia and wikileak's actions. The crime was the obstruction of justice by the President..... but that is neither here nor there at this point. At this point we need to see what happens over the next 3-5 months and if the President loses, will he voluntarily give up office. Also, do not give me any BS about the right admitting when they are wrong and the left not doing so........ look no further than the President of the United States.
That is the point we are not bound to a dictator and the difference is not if but when biden does something wrong will be the first to call him out.. Respect what is right!! Country over party you jagoff. This is not a monarchy and arguing strange points that you admit are wrong is trolling. You have been a troll from day 1 I admit to being wrong all the time and people can be wrong vs. outright trolls like you. This thread tucker thread should be deleted.. Here is an example of stating i was wrong http://bbs.clutchfans.net/index.php...tch-for-disney-2020-nba-restart.305621/page-4
LOL... you (1) felt the need to deflect with a false equivalence since (2) the so called russian collusion case was never "thoroughly debunked". But... you be you.
Trustworthy Tucker Carlson https://www.sltrib.com/artsliving/2020/06/21/scott-d-pierce-fox/ "The Fox News legal team is defending against a slander lawsuit by claiming that (a) what Carlson says isn’t news; (b) he doesn’t necessarily do any research; and (c) what he says isn’t necessarily true. “Would a reasonable viewer be coming here [to ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’] and thinking, ‘This is where I’m going to be hearing the news of the day’?” Fox News attorney Erin Murphy asked in a hearing-via-telephone on Wednesday, according to reporter Frank G. Runyeons’s story at Law360.com." "And in an earlier court filing, Murphy referred to “Tucker Carlson Tonight” as “hyperbolic opinion commentary,” not “sober factual reporting.” That’s not exactly a surprise — the only surprise is that Fox’s lawyers openly admitted that." "Fox News contends that it doesn’t matter if Carlson accused her of a crime and got his facts wrong because “Tucker Carlson Tonight” isn’t about facts. When the judge asked Fox’s attorneys, “Does somebody in Mr. Carlson’s position have a duty of inquiry?” — the answer was no.
Lol trump was impeached for it.. Dang this dude is vying for top troll in one thread ..good work Even brutalizing bigotexx is less pathetic
From An Introduction to Grammar "Question marks should not generally be doubled for emphasis or paired with exclamation points."
I was just curious to see if you'd ever come back to admit it. Did you get called a troll too? You seemed sincere in admitting you were wrong. Not that it matters, but I do respect you more now that I know you've admitted to being wrong. For some people (my wife comes to mind..lol) it's something that is hard to do. Delete the thread, don't delete it. Makes no difference to me. Seems like there's a sub-conversation going on but whatever. I'll at least hesitate before I start a thread next time. @TheRealist137 You werre right. There's a lesson to be learned. (two I was wrongs, eh?)
