1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

NYT hires an Open racist to their editorial board

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by RocketsLegend, Aug 2, 2018.

  1. Amiga

    Amiga Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    25,035
    Likes Received:
    23,294
    She joined NYT this month. Her “racist” remarks were mostly in 2013-14.

    Have you ever heard of "The Internet of Garbage"? https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25910719-the-internet-of-garbage

    Online harassment is her field of expertise. You have to ask, why is someone that is an expert in that area did what she did with those nasty tweets. NYT knew about it and hired her anyway.
     
  2. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,046
    I guess I got fished in by the neo Nazi **** diggers.

    What a time to be alive
     
  3. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,372
    Likes Received:
    121,702
    some might find this of interest:

    https://quillette.com/2018/08/18/th...-up-harmed-the-science-fiction-fantasy-world/

    an excerpt:

    [T]he view that “woke” white-bashing is a harmless, justified, and perhaps even commendable form of “punching up” is now mainstream in liberal/progressive culture in North America (and some other Western countries)....

    The defense of “punching up” is a fundamental part of the left-identitarian ideology (also known as “social justice” or “intersectionality”) that has become the quasi-official progressive creed in the 2010s. In this creed, all human interaction is seen primarily through the lens of “power dynamics” and the “oppression/privilege” hierarchy; thus, hostile or demeaning speech is judged by whether the speaker and the target are “privileged” or “marginalized.”

    There are many reasons, both moral and practical, to criticize this ideology. It inevitably undermines modern Western society’s hard-won taboo on racial insults and is likely to provoke a backlash. It relies on crude and often skewed definitions of power, privilege and oppression—so that, for instance, Jeong, a Harvard Law School graduate and successful journalist from a minority group with higher income and lower incarceration rates than white Americans, can outscore an unemployed white high school dropout in “oppression points.” (Or so that Jeong supporter Rani Molla, another journalist with an elite degree and from a thriving demographic, can deride “whiny” rural white workers at a chicken processing plant.)

    However, the normalization of “punching up” can also do more immediate and tangible harm. In many cases, it can enable and excuse abusive behavior supposedly motivated by righteous anger or “anti-oppression” activism.
    more at the link
     
  4. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,372
    Likes Received:
    121,702
    so how does Sarah Jeong's racism compare with the Rutgers prof's racism? asking for a friend. :cool:
     

Share This Page