1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

NRO's Larry Kudlow gives us reasons for optimism in 2002.

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by cmrockfan, Jan 1, 2002.

  1. cmrockfan

    cmrockfan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2001
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mr. Kudlow is CEO of Kudlow & Co.
    December 28, 2001 7:00 a.m.


    Two thousand and one was a year of tumultuous change, marked by war and recession, heartbreak and fear, but also resiliency and recovery. Taking it all into account, however, the outlook for America has never been more optimistic. Here are ten reasons (and one Person of the Year nominee) why.

    1. The War Against Terror. The bombings of the Pentagon and the World Trade Center, and the onset of the U.S.-led global war against terrorism, have changed the nation forever. But I believe it is change for the better. Bin Laden badly miscalculated — his actions awakened the spirit of a sleeping giant whose mighty boiler of production and valor in action have already crushed the terrorists in Afghanistan and will continue to successfully destroy terrorism wherever it exists. At home, patriotism and faith have reawakened as never before. No matter how long it takes, freedom and democracy will prevail.

    2. The New Bush Doctrine. In his national address following September 11, President Bush clearly outlined the gameplan for the freedom-loving world: "Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: either you are with us or you are with the terrorists." (And that includes states that harbor terrorists.)

    3. Our Mighty Military, Unveiled. The emergence of the overwhelmingly dominant U.S. military, with its incredible high-tech precision bombing guided by the intelligence-gathering operation of crack commando forces on the ground, proved critical armchair strategists, dubious Russian generals, and other hand wringers completely wrong. In a few months, U.S. forces were able to achieve what the old Soviet Union couldn't do in ten years.

    4. The Bear Hug. The emerging alliance between the U.S. and Russia will lead to a mutual reduction in nuclear arsenals, and has already broken the OPEC oil cartel that had disrupted the world economy for three decades.

    5. The Herculean Effort. The leadership of New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani shows once again what a positive difference one good man can make.

    6. The New Bull Run. The post-9/11 stock-market upturn signals the beginning of the new bull market and heralds economic recovery in 2002.

    7. Two Trade-Ups. Successful congressional votes on China free trade and presidential trade-promotion authority — defeating the best efforts of protectionists — are the year's major pro-growth measures from Washington.

    8. The Tech Advance. New technological breakthroughs such as Intel's shrinkage of transistors and IBM's quantum computing to generate additional information-processing power will further transform the U.S. economy and produce even greater productivity and prosperity.

    9. The Cut. The passage of Bush's broad-based tax cut last spring — the first reduction in personal tax rates since 1986 — will gradually improve economic growth incentives and limit domestic government spending over the coming decade.

    10. The Free-Market Reminder. Enron's poorly executed (and possibly fraudulent) new business plan to shift from a traditional power provider to a commodities-trading energy company resulted in bankruptcy with tragic costs to workers and investors. But it demonstrates that in a free-market capitalist system, if you go under — you go under.

    As for the 2001 Person of the Year, I nominate President George W. Bush: for his clarity of vision; his resolute purposefulness to defend American democracy and freedom; his eloquence; his military leadership; his strength of moral character; and his faith in God.

    We are blessed to have him as our president
     
  2. Mango

    Mango Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 1999
    Messages:
    7,818
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    <b>
    3. Our Mighty Military, Unveiled. The emergence of the overwhelmingly dominant U.S. military, with its incredible high-tech precision bombing guided by the intelligence-gathering operation of crack commando forces on the ground, proved critical armchair strategists, dubious Russian generals, and other hand wringers completely wrong. In a few months, U.S. forces were able to achieve what the old Soviet Union couldn't do in ten years.
    </b>

    Several factors have changed over the past two decades.

    Smarter munitions

    Better coordination/communication between ground troops and the Air Force.

    Restricted supply from Pakistan

    The Taliban lacked effective air defense weapons.

    Hostility to the Taliban in Northern Afghanistan.

    US - Russian cooperation in 2001 versus the opposing forces mindset in the 1980's.




    <b>
    7. Two Trade-Ups. Successful congressional votes on China free trade and presidential trade-promotion authority — defeating the best efforts of protectionists — are the year's major pro-growth measures from Washington.
    </b>


    With the decline in Russian military power projection and the desire by China to take on a more dominant role, the US should be wary of giving away the store to China.

    <A HREF="http://carlisle-www.army.mil/usassi/ssipubs/pubs2001/chininfo/chininfo.pdf">Chinese interest in Information Warfare</A>


    <A HREF="http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/2001/04/050405121548.asp">Key points from Marshall's Strategic Review</A>

    The timeframe for China to be a <i>force</i> is not in the near future, but perhaps a decade or two away.




    Mango
     
  3. cmrockfan

    cmrockfan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2001
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for those links Mango. I believe that we should view China as a belligerant competitor.

    Our relationship with China is so complex that I don't think anybody has the right answer to the problems China poses to us. If we isolate them, then they will align themselves with terrorist nations and create a larger enemy against the West. We don't need China trading weapons systems for oil.

    If we engage them, we make them stronger, and risk the reality that they will become a superpower and not change their totalitarian government. Our cultures will eventually clash either way.

    I don't pretend to know the best course (and I am sure there are countless more scenarios than the two simple one I presented). Hopefully, our two economies will become so intertwined that war will seem a ridiculous proposition.

    The most discouraging thing to me is that China is successfully filtering the internet, and not allowing its citizens access to a free press. The Chinese know that if they cannot control the free flow of information, they cannot hold on to their despotic form of power.
     
  4. Dr of Dunk

    Dr of Dunk Clutch Crew

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 1999
    Messages:
    45,276
    Likes Received:
    31,318
    While dominant, let's be realistic. It's been 20 years of technological advances. The enemy is now splintered into factions opposing one another -- this helped. It wasn't superpower vs. superpower anymore in terms of supplying weaponry. We had aid from several countries about locations, terrain, possible hideouts, use of their resources, etc. Keep in mind, in these battles most of the bloody fighting was done by the Northern Alliance on the ground. We stuck to the skies (for the most part).

    To me it heralded the recovery from the crash of 9/11. We're right back at pre-9/11 numbers in terms of the DJIA and NASDAQ. Compared the numbers today with the numbers around 9/5/01. I think we'll have to wait a bit to see if we're coming out of a recession. If you got into the market after the jackass attacks on the WTC, yes, you're making out like a bandit, but if you stayed in the market, you're about at the same point you were at before you went down. This isn't necessarily a valid sign of a "bull market".

    Intel and AMD have been shrinking the die in the fab plants for years. That's not by itself going to "transform the economy". IBM's quantum computing is so much in its infancy that it's just another gee-whiz concept at the moment. They recently used atoms to factor a number. Oh boy. While impressive, there's no practical use for this yet. Quantum computers won't be around for another several years.


    Give a lot of credit to his advisors, too. As far as "person of the year", I'd give it to Rudy Giulliani or bin Stupid (assuming that the award isn't a good-guy award).
     
  5. Mango

    Mango Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 1999
    Messages:
    7,818
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    Actually, the Russians saw the great potential for the marriage of high technology and military operations, yet they lacked in certain economic and technology areas to capitalize on that vision.

    <A HREF="http://www.capitol.northgrum.com/files/WhatIsRMAApr95.pdf">The Revolution in Military Affairs</A>




    Mango
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now