1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

North Korea Pulls Out

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by rimrocker, Jan 10, 2003.

  1. DUCK2324

    DUCK2324 Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    3
    If you drop enough bombs in short time it would cripple the country. We know were the majority of the military is. Take out there goverentment. Why do we even mess with these crazy country's. Destroy them why hurt them alittle so that they can grow right back and now have even more hatred. Look at Iraq. If we would of finished that job the first time we would not be in the situation we are in now. Our country allways does this even in our own country. We let murders out of our jails. We set free Child rapist . This country has become a wuss because of politicians. We need to not allow ANY more foreigners into our country that are not from a civilized country. We need to make a stand now a start finishing the messes we start. Clean up our own country. If you kill somebody or rape anybody in half of those country they execute you then. Why do we give these desease's a second chance they don't.
     
    #21 DUCK2324, Jan 10, 2003
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2003
  2. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,132
    North Korea is different. They have a huge standing army and could do some serious damage to South Korea before we could knock them out.
     
  3. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,822
    Likes Received:
    5,226
    That is true. That is their military strength...
     
  4. DUCK2324

    DUCK2324 Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    3
    So because we are afraid they might be able to do some damage to South Korea we just roll over and let make NUKES. Then they would much easier to deal with.
     
  5. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    Thank God. We don't need any little North Korea's running around.
     
  6. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,134
    Likes Received:
    10,186
    They're working on it...
    ___________________________-

    North Korea's missile has better than expected accuracy: report

    TOKYO (AFP) Jan 07, 2003
    North Korea's Rodong-1 ballistic missile, which can hit almost all of the Japanese islands, is more accurate than previously thought, local media reported Tuesday.
    "The probability that it lands within two kilometers (1.25 miles) from the target is 50 percent," the Jiji news agency reported, quoting unspecified sources.

    The information on the Rodong's accuracy has been obtained by Japan's Defense Agency, Jiji said, without elaborating who provided the data.

    In its 2002 white paper, the agencay said the Rodong, with an estimated range of 1,300 kilometers (806 miles), is "able to reach almost all of Japan's territory."

    The Rodong, based on Scud missile technology, might not, however, be accurate enough to "carry out pinpoint attacks on specific target installations."

    The Rodong is "feared to cause tremendous damage" if it is fired toward big cities like Tokyo, although the reported accuracy is not so great as missiles possessed by countries other than North Korea, the sources said.

    According to South Korean defense ministry data, North Korea is currently testing Taepodong-1 missiles with a range of 2,500 kilometers (1,550 miles) and are also developing longer-range Taepodong-2 missiles.
     
  7. heypartner

    heypartner Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    63,511
    Likes Received:
    59,008
    being that Korea is such a limp-dick looking penis-ula, the title of this thread makes me wonder if they were ever really "in" the Treaty.
     
  8. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,132
    Well, we got fu**ed so I think they were in. And now they are getting ready to screw South Korea probably.:p
     
  9. DUCK2324

    DUCK2324 Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    3
    Now is the time to take that country out. Hold up on Iraq and take out the country we know has long range Nukes and are likely to use them
     
    #29 DUCK2324, Jan 10, 2003
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2003
  10. Cohen

    Cohen Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    10,751
    Likes Received:
    6
    I'm not being creative, and they wouldn't need to get too close:

    Sea-Launched Ballistic Missile?

    Aside from the Shahab 3 and 4, a 5 May 1999 Op-Ed article in the Washington Times indicated that Iran had test fired a Sea-Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) last spring from a barge in the Caspian Sea. The information in the report was based on classified U.S. intelligence assessments known to the White House, but not yet disseminated to Congress. The article was authored by Kenneth Timmerman, contributing editor to Reader's Digest magazine, and publisher of the Iran Brief newsletter.
    While technically an SLBM, the system employed a short-range, surface-to-surface missile, and apparently draws on an early Russian approach to launching missiles from naval vessels.
    This very type of system was described by the Rumsfeld Commission in 1998 as a possible "alternative ballistic missile launch mode," by which an adversary could pose "a direct territorial threat to the U.S. sooner than it could by waiting to develop an ICBM [Intercontinental-range Ballistic Missile] for launch from its own territory."


    The test was Iranian, but I believe the missiles were N. Korean.
     
  11. Cohen

    Cohen Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    10,751
    Likes Received:
    6
    Oh...okay. :rolleyes:
     
  12. fatfatcow

    fatfatcow Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    0
    i wonder how many american think like u!!!!???
     
  13. VooDooPope

    VooDooPope Love > Hate

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 1999
    Messages:
    9,244
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Uhh, that doesn't make me feel any better. Excuse me while I get back to work on that fallout shelter. The world is going crazy, and I have two children I'm responsible for bringing into this world. What kind of my world will my children enjoy if we are on the brink of WWIII as the Koreans warn in their rhetoric? Can't the world wait to self destruct until my childrens lives have passed, or at least until the Rockets win a couple more championships?
     
  14. VooDooPope

    VooDooPope Love > Hate

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 1999
    Messages:
    9,244
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Not many. Probably the same number of N.Koreans who think starting a Nuclear War with the US is a good thing to do.
     
  15. fatfatcow

    fatfatcow Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    0
    yes bomb the **** out north korean n anyother country that is anti american with long range missile, thats the only way for a better peaceful world for the american!!!!
     
  16. Zac D

    Zac D Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2000
    Messages:
    2,733
    Likes Received:
    46
    If there's another spelling contest sometime, you've got to enter it.

    As for North Korea, I tend to agree with most of what Major is saying.

    Wasn't it just a few days ago that Bush agreed to open up some sort of diplomatic talks with North Korea? If I remember right, that was viewed as an American concession of sorts. It seems a little off to me that agreements between nations to talk can be viewed as a victory or defeat for one side or the other. But if it's true that North Korea wanted diplomatic contact and we were the ones who had been ignoring them, so to speak, then doesn't it stand to reason that, if they want to talk to us, there's something they want from us? Do we know what that is yet? And if we find out, could we not defuse this whole "crisis" without the use of military force?
     
  17. fatfatcow

    fatfatcow Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    0
    u see all these anti american countries see amercian is so militiray strong n they see they can only survive n make the amercian think twice before invading them is to have icbms n nuclears weapoons! now if the usa attack iraq will make these countries like iran n north korea more determin to have long range misslies n nuclear weapoons unless the american dont care about how the world see them then destroy all these countries otherwise military threats or actions wont solve any problem!
     
  18. fatfatcow

    fatfatcow Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    0
    also invading iraq and not north korea proof to these countries that only strong militray stregth n nuclear power is the only way willl n can stop attack from the u.s!
     
  19. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,134
    Likes Received:
    10,186
    In spite of the presentation, there is some truth here. If you play this idea out, it becomes quite scary for everyone on the globe.
     
  20. Cohen

    Cohen Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    10,751
    Likes Received:
    6
    Maybe not being a rogue State is the best defense.
     

Share This Page