1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[NLCS] Astros @ Cardinals Game 1

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by Castor27, Oct 12, 2004.

  1. bottlerocket

    bottlerocket Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,539
    Likes Received:
    5
    Both teams bullpen sux. So the Astros need to out slug the Red Birds and play better defense b/c our pitchers can't hold lead with exception of B. Lidge.
     
  2. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,388
    Likes Received:
    39,958
    Another example is the Diamondbacks with Schilling and Johnson.

    We reallly need to win tomorrow.....

    DD
     
  3. codell

    codell Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    19,312
    Likes Received:
    715


    And you critisized Garner for that (see your locked thread)! Thats your problem. You rant without knowing the facts.

    Depends on how you look at it. It worked out well since Roy was able to come back on 3 days rest and pitch effectively to get us the win. Perhaps that was part of Garner's thought process.

    I don't think you want a rookie start to "learn" during the post season. Garner is making the right decisions with him IMO.

    The Cardinals weren't resting players in that series. Rolen was out with an injury.

    And while Backe wasn't getting hammered, he was hardly shutting them down.

    And again, YOU DON"T KNOW WHAT BACKE HAD LEFT IN THE TANK.
    I trust that Garner and/or Ausmus did. They make the call in that situation, not Backe. Backe is not Clemens or Oswalt.

    Based on what? Oswalt's game 2 against the Braves, I can possibly understand. However, he was close to 100 pitches and Garner might have anticipated needing him on 3 days rest.

    Your rants probably don't help bud.
     
  4. codell

    codell Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    19,312
    Likes Received:
    715
    BTW, .......Larry Walker is the X factor in this series IMO. If he keeps hitting like he did tonight, then they are devastating 2-7. Many analysts weren't even mentioning him when talking about the potent lineup of the Cardinals.

    I mean ..who do you pitch around? Walker?? nope ..Pujols is next

    Pitch around Pujols?? nope...MVP Scott Rolen is next

    Pitch around Rolen?? nope...Astro killer and 40 HR guy Jim Edmonds is next

    Pitch around Edmonds?? maybe...you still have two 20 HR guys in Sanders and Renteria next.

    Walker really completes that lineup.
     
  5. BigM

    BigM Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2001
    Messages:
    18,091
    Likes Received:
    13,366

    yeah and what did they give up to get him again? at the time i thought the move was nothing but i didn't know walker had so much left in the tank. damn you colorado!!!
     
  6. codell

    codell Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    19,312
    Likes Received:
    715
    I think Colorado was more anxious to dump his big salary.

    Walker has been injured alot the last 2-3 years, but hes still put up great #s when he has played.

    He hit 17 HRs this year in only 72 games. Not bad.
     
  7. rockets-#1

    rockets-#1 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,895
    Likes Received:
    9
    I really liked reading codell's and DaDakota's posts. I respect y'alls opinions more then most on this board, so can you both please shut up with your feud!? I say that with much respect. Let's talk about how good the Astros bats are and how worthless guys like....a player who's initials are CHAD QUALLS!:mad:
     
  8. WasabiTheNinjaPimp

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    462
    Likes Received:
    0

    Both bullpens don't suck, the cardinals had one of the better bullpens in the NL this year.
     
  9. moestavern19

    moestavern19 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 1999
    Messages:
    39,003
    Likes Received:
    3,641
    1/5th of the total posts in this forum have come in the past 3 weeks.
     
  10. across110thstreet

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2001
    Messages:
    12,856
    Likes Received:
    1,613
    in all fairness, albert pujols missed game 3 of that series, he was resting
     
  11. IROC it

    IROC it Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 1999
    Messages:
    12,629
    Likes Received:
    89
    That's the spirit!!

    I Believe!! Go 'Stros!!
     
  12. wizard

    wizard Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 1999
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    1
    all three of our pitchers who have gone on 3 days rest have said their legs were gone going into the 5th inning....... its not like Garner has a choice to take our starters out in our last 3 games......

    "I was pretty beat, to tell you the truth," Backe said. "I'm sure that Phil saw it. He threw 93 pitches and admitted he was out of wind by the fifth.
     
  13. bottlerocket

    bottlerocket Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,539
    Likes Received:
    5
    I have to disagree, obviously. They are VERY hitable. Look what the 'Stros did to them in the late innings and prior meetings. This games will be high scoring games.

    Just agree the Cards suk!
     
  14. Castor27

    Castor27 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2001
    Messages:
    10,199
    Likes Received:
    1,634
    I'll say my piece and then move on to the new thread.

    It was just game one. I think this series has a long way to go. Qualls did not do a great job but he did not get hammered either. He gave up a double on a sawed off broken bat cheapy, then gave up a few infield hits. The Cardinals did not tatoo him, they just got some fortunate breaks. i thought Backe did a good job and that Garner should have given him a chance to get Rolen. We showed that we could hit St. Louis pitching and we were the ones pounding the ball. I will not be worried unless we get down 3-0. Bring on game 2.
     
  15. Master Baiter

    Master Baiter Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    9,608
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    Castor, I totally agree. So many of their runs were flukes. We can still do this!! I BELIEVE!!!!
     
  16. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    This is why I'm not big on pitching guys on 3-days rest. Why I was hoping for rain yesterday. And why I wish Munro would have been pitching last night.

    Had we lost Game 1 with Munro on the mound, but had a fresh Backe for Game 2, that would be a far better position than the one we're in right now.

    Seriously...enough with the 3 days rest stuff. We can't afford to pitch our best pitchers at only 5 innings when our bullpen is this shaky. I'd rather pitch a Munro and then have my solid guys at their full strength...otherwise, we're handicapping our strengths.

    But clearly the Astros can beat this team. The law of averages says those little seeing-eye ground balls they hit will play against them later in the series. Let's hope it does tonight.

    GO 'STROS!!!
     
  17. The Real Shady

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2000
    Messages:
    17,173
    Likes Received:
    3,972
    Totally agree. We need a fresh Roger and Roy that can give us 7 innings.
     
  18. Surfguy

    Surfguy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 1999
    Messages:
    24,602
    Likes Received:
    12,895
    I heard a stat that the team that loses the first game loses the series for the last several series. We will have to change that trend.

    As far as this game, I think Garner kind of screwed up in that he left Qualls in even after it was evident Qualls was not getting the job done. If he would have pulled him earlier, then we might have had a better chance to limit their run scoring in that inning. Then again...we might not have as we don't have a truly reliable arm in middle relief apparently.

    It's possible we could have won that game if we pulled Qualls earlier when they had the 7 spot on the board. I don't want to get into what could have been but I was disappointed that Garner hung Qualls out to dry for so long. He obviously wasn't getting it done so you put someone else in. Garner didn't do that for whatever reason.

    Qualls just isn't getting the job done so why is he our first option out of the bullpen in middle relief?
     
  19. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    Qualls got weak ground balls that got through the infield. The inning should have been over before it exploded.

    I'm not a big Qualls fan...but they weren't exactly hitting him hard all over the place. Edmonds hit was obviously the back-breaker..but the other hits were mostly soft grounders that found a way through. I can't fault a pitcher for that. That's just bad luck.
     
  20. Surfguy

    Surfguy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 1999
    Messages:
    24,602
    Likes Received:
    12,895
    I agree...Qualls had some bad luck last night. But, even so, a pitching change can sometimes turn the tide. How long do you stand by and let Qualls try to get out of the inning regardless? I thought Garner waited too long to do something about it.
     

Share This Page