1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

NFL wins case against Clarett

Discussion in 'Football: NFL, College, High School' started by Master Baiter, Apr 19, 2004.

  1. gr8-1

    gr8-1 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    7,918
    Likes Received:
    4
    I think it's a good rule, but even if I thought it was stupid, I still think it should be left up to the owners. If they don't want to let 20 year olds in, it should be their perrogative.
     
  2. Uprising

    Uprising Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2000
    Messages:
    43,101
    Likes Received:
    6,643
    Glad to hear it.

    I heard on PTI today that 12 highschool players are attempting to enter the NBA draft.

    Hopefully this will have an effect on the NBA draft also.
     
  3. Manny Ramirez

    Manny Ramirez The Music Man

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Messages:
    28,850
    Likes Received:
    5,757
    Exactly. Thank God that Clarett didn't get the easy way out. Such a shame that he has to put up with, *ugh*, college for 2 more years or so.
     
  4. tozai

    tozai Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2001
    Messages:
    2,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thankfully. I sort of feel bad for Mike Williams, but not Clarett. I doubt the NCAA will reinstate him, so I guess that means he'll be in the supplemental draft. I do think players should have the right to leave just like in the NBA, but I don't think it'd every get as bad as basketball because
    -No guaranteed money
    -Greater physical jump
    -Greater mental jump
     
  5. francis 4 prez

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2001
    Messages:
    22,025
    Likes Received:
    4,552
    i think the nfl should get to keep this rule simply because i don't think you should get to tell an organization what rules it can set, especially when those have been agreed upon by labor and management.

    and while i like the side effect of keeping college better, that is a HORRIBLE argument to make. potentially costing someone millions of dollars so you can enjoy a game (as much as we all may like it) is very poor grounds for not letting them in the nfl. while medical technology has come to the point that you can recover from almost anything, there's still never a guarantee if you get injured that you'll return to 100% and that's still the reason i never blame a guy for jumping to the nba for the 3 year guaranteed contract. if you can set yourself up financially for the rest of your life, you should always take the chance (and be allowed to) unless you just really love college and wanna take the injury chance.

    so will mike williams be in the supplemental draft (assuming they have it) even if they uphold this stay and he's not allowed in the real draft? or will that just happen if they overturn this stay but it comes after the draft has happened?


    oh, and what the hell is the supplemental draft? if you use a pick in it do you lose that same pick in the next real draft?
     
  6. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    Just because they are a private organization is a lousy reason. So if they didn't want brown players or jews or gays that would be OK because they are private?

    Maybe they could get away with a 21 year old rule (can bars and strip clubs make sure employees are 21 or over?). Maybe, but 3 years out of high school makes no sense.

    Agreed. The colleges exploit the athletes pure an simple. If top flight college athletes could get injury insurance and 20K stipends then the NCAA could make some case they are looking after their student athletes.
     
  7. VesceySux

    VesceySux World Champion Lurker
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Messages:
    7,552
    Likes Received:
    234
    Sweet. ESPN has an article totally relevant to me.

    Good. I wasn't gonna make any changes, anyway.
     
  8. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    26,579
    Likes Received:
    16,966
    So if the owners decided they didn't want blacks, it should be their perogative. I don't like decisions based on arbitrary lines whether it be race, age, culture, etc. In a monopoly situation such as the NFL, decisions are required to be just, iirc. If this was a restaurant chain, it could be punished by boycotts and the loss of qualified canidates.
     
  9. Harrisment

    Harrisment Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2001
    Messages:
    15,392
    Likes Received:
    2,158
    How about president of the united states? You have to be 35 to be elected...do you think that should be changed to allow all ages? Some would argue that an NFL player is a more important position in our country than president.




    ;)
     
  10. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,859
    Likes Received:
    3,731
    Apparently plenty of owners were ready to draft Mike Williams in the top 10. That's the problem with the law, the owners are want these kids just as much as the kids want to come out, and that's why the law won't hold up. No one is forcing anyone to hire people they don't want to.
     
  11. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    26,579
    Likes Received:
    16,966
    I actually wouldn't have a problem with that considering the over 35 crowd has not produced a suitable canidate. I do wish canidates had to pass a citizen bee.
     
  12. mrpaige

    mrpaige Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2000
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    15
    If the owners truly don't like the rule, they can get rid of the rule. The NFL came up with the rule, and the owners are the NFL.

    Since they have not done so, it seems like it might be that, collectively, the owners do want the rule. There's no one, except the owners themselves, keeping the NFL from scrapping the rules on their own.
     
  13. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,859
    Likes Received:
    3,731
    But they are the ones also willing to draft the guy also.
     
  14. mrpaige

    mrpaige Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2000
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    15
    The collective mood is often different from the mood of the individual teams. When they make league rules, they at least try to make a decision that will be good for the league as a whole. When they talk about drafting a particular player if available, they're making a decision that relates to their team getting a competitive advantage.
     
  15. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    But if they really believe that sophomores shouldn't be allowed to enter the draft because they're not physically ready, why would they take one in the first round? You can't say one thing, then do the opposite.
     
  16. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,859
    Likes Received:
    3,731
    mrpaige,

    I'm not really arguing with, its just silly to say that this is what the NFL wants, when you're right, the NFL is the collection of owners and individually they are clearly ready to draft underclassmen.
     
  17. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    I don't buy this "it is ok to be arbirary and discriminatory because private organizations can set their own rules" argument at all.
    In the 50s pro sports franchices had a rule like that no Black players were allowed, that is OK? Is it OK to exclude Jews, gays, and those over 35 from pro football because the owners want to?
     
  18. mrpaige

    mrpaige Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2000
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    15
    To me, I think that's just an excuse that's used in an attempt to have a reason to have the rule.

    I do think they're hypocritical, but I also believe there is a dual nature to the decision-making in the NFL. You really can't say they want one thing or the other because they do want both things. They want to keep these kids out AND they want to have them on their team.
     
  19. Lil Pun

    Lil Pun Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 1999
    Messages:
    34,143
    Likes Received:
    1,038
    Supreme Court ruled against Clarett. Saw it on Breaking News on espn.com.
     
  20. JPM0016

    JPM0016 Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    4,471
    Likes Received:
    43
    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1787651

    Associated Press
    WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court refused Thursday to let Maurice Clarett into the National Football League draft this weekend, delaying for now the 20-year-old's attempt to be the first player chosen less than three years after completing high school.


    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she saw no reason to overturn a lower court's stay preventing him from being chosen by a professional team.


    The former Ohio State tailback is fighting the NFL's requirement that players wait three years after high school before turning pro.


    The decision also keeps wide receiver Mike Williams of Southern California out of the draft.


    Williams, who entered the draft after the original decision allowing in Clarett, would have been a first-round pick while Clarett likely would have gone in the second or third round.


    The NFL said in a filing with Ginsburg that it could be unfair to the team that picked Clarett, and ultimately to a player who loses out on that spot.


    "Noting the National Football League's commitment promptly to conduct a supplemental draft" if Clarett eventually is determined eligible, Ginsburg said she will not intervene.


    The NFL had said Clarett could participate in training camps this summer, if he wins his case in a lower court.


    Clarett was appealing a stay issued Monday by the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, putting a hold on a lower-court ruling that said the NFL can't enforce its three-year rule.


    The decision was announced in a brief letter to the appeals court. Ginsburg handled the matter because she oversees appeals from New York, which is where the NFL is based.


    Clarett led Ohio State to a national title as a freshman, but was ruled ineligible as a sophomore for accepting money from a family friend and lying about it to NCAA and university investigators. Clarett, out of high school two years, would be eligible for the 2005 draft under the current rule.


    Clarett's attorney, Alan Milstein, had told Ginsburg the player would "suffer substantial irreparable injury" if he was not allowed in the draft.


    Clarett could refile his request with another justice, but the outcome likely would not be different.


    Most emergency appeals are rejected by the court.


    Ohio State coach Jim Tressel had said it was "far-fetched" that Clarett would return to play for the Buckeyes. He dropped out of classes at Ohio State after the winter quarter.


    "From an academic standpoint, unless the NCAA really changes its posture about academics, I think it would be difficult," Tressel said.


    Former stars such as Reggie White, Cris Carter and Bernie Kosar entered the NFL after being taken in supplemental drafts.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now