McKelvin(?) pretty much singlehandedly lost the game. It would have been Bills ball with 2 minutes left, up by 5. He could have just went dead weight the moment he was wrapped up but instead fought for extra yards, inconsequential on a kickoff return. And this raider game has been entertaining as well.
The rules about the ball touching the ground are ridiculous. How is that not a catch? I'm not even a Raiders fan and I'm disgusted.
MAN... no way... that was a touchdown, sir... I don't care how much ANYONE hates the Raiders... or moes... but that was a TD. What gives, No Fun League?
What a ****ing stupid call. He's got his both feet down, knees down, and the ground doesn't make the ball pop out. Not to mention it wasn't conclusive enough. Jesus ****ing Christ what a **** call. **** this bull****.
oh dont get me wrong, no question it was a TD, just thought it was funny they wouldnt get that call. if anything it wasnt definitive evidence to overturn.
Yah you guys did. Get over it. We actually lost a game last year because of it. *coucgh* hochuli* cough*
I thought, in the endzone, long as you have two feet touching the ground, and possesion, that was it? That's what happened there. Oh well, I need Phil Rivers to throw the ball more, especially to Vince Jackson.
I was thinking that since Ladanian Touchdownson fumbled earlier, I would also get lucky (that's what she said) and get Rivers throwing more, but then they had to punch that ONE YARDer into the endzone... hopefully Rivers pass--well, hot darn, that sack didn't help me, either.
10 - 10. I feel embarrassed.... The Raiders got screwed but it happens, (refer to Bronocs vs Cahrgers week 2 2008-2009 season.) We better step it up.
^ LOL! Negative touchdowns. You REALLY suck CBS Sportsline for adding (or subtract, in this case) negative touchdowns. FAIL.
