You aren't making any sense. You're either a bitter Vikings fan or you're just analyzing the game based off the box score. In any event, let's have some fun with this. For starters, you're complaining about a Vikings' negated TD while conveniently ignoring the one the Steelers had. I guess that doesn't count, right? What about the Mendenhall red zone fumble? Is that worthy of consideration or were the Vikings too busy "dominating" for you to even notice?
I started Vernon Davis in one of my leagues, but in my other one I decided to bench him for f'kin Greg Olson. I need Ocho Cinco to score 6 TD's.
Vikings hardly dominated; stop staring the box score. The Time of Possession was so out of wack, because the 4th quarter, the Steelers only had the ball 1 possession. Steelers had 2 offensive 40+ yard plays. Vikings had 0. Special teams/Defense 40+ yards Steelers 2. Vikings 1.
Alex Smith Effect? Bench your bust of a former #1 overall pick and bring him in to shine at a later date.
He should have been benched 3 games ago. I don't know how he looked good last season those last few games, but he's regressed big time.
lol yeah two 80 yard defensive touchdowns. One off a stripped ball (good job D) and another off a botched screen pass that Taylor should have caught and on top of that the viks shouldn't have even been throwing there. I'm not a Vikings fan, but they dominated that game and are the better team.
What is the point to say who dominated or outplayed who when the score determines who won the game? Both teams made mistake, but the Steelers MADE THE PLAYS in the clutch.