1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[NEW VID RELEASED] Firefighters talk of explosives on @ 9/11

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by ToyCen428, Oct 6, 2010.

Tags:
Page 7 of 7
  1. trustme

    trustme Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,917
    Likes Received:
    205
    If the govt was behind 9/11, and if they did it to go into Afghanistan/Iraq, and all they needed was an attack on Americans, then why would they decide to not only drop WTC 1 and 2, but also WTC 7? What do they get by dropping a third building as well? I'm sure if 7 wasn't demolished then it really wouldn't have made such a big difference in their decision to go into Iraq/Afghanistan and for the American ppl to support the war. Or would it have?
     
    #121 trustme, Oct 8, 2010
  2. trustme

    trustme Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,917
    Likes Received:
    205
    <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1CR5139AXnE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1CR5139AXnE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

    seems like a lot of ppl in the audience are agreeing with him. nevertheless, the JFK assassination always did seem fishy to me from 11th grade. my teacher mentioned that the official classified documents were going to be made public in the year 2032 or something. when he was asked why he said, "because everyone who was possibly involved with the assassination would have already been dead, so no one can be held accountable for it."
     
    #122 trustme, Oct 8, 2010
  3. across110thstreet

    across110thstreet Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2001
    Messages:
    12,855
    Likes Received:
    1,611

    not when you are sharing false information that has PROVEN wrong am I going to ignore your posts.

    I have said this before, you have a very irresponsible style of sharing false information.

    you provide no links and start each "proven fact" with a vague phrase like "I have heard" or "I have read" or "there are reports out there..."

    I don't believe in making fun of you as a joke around these parts, but I do honestly believe you get enjoyment from being the butt of the jokes around here as a tin-hat UFO conspiracy theorist. and I genuinely agree with other posters that there might be some psychological issues going on for you to believe some of the stuff you read.

    I think it is dangerous and wrong to share the info you share in the way you share it.

    your assessment about the 9/11 victims and CNN coverage is ABSOLUTELY 100% WRONG.
     
    #123 across110thstreet, Oct 8, 2010
  4. Kyrodis

    Kyrodis Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    22
    This is the one argument that every conspiracy theorist throws out there to convince the masses that the government and the media were in cahoots.

    The problem is, why would you involve the media in the first place? ToyCen, let's say for the sake of argument that there was a massive conspiracy by the federal government to bring down the Twin Towers. What makes more sense to you? Tell the media that you're bringing down the towers and give them a script to read? Or bring them down and just let the media report it the way they normally do?

    Couldn't it have just been a mistake on BBC's part (a British news outlet mind you...not an American one) given all the spotty information floating around that day? I suppose that's too "simple" of an explanation though.
     
    #124 Kyrodis, Oct 8, 2010
  5. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,173
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Arlington, VA is about 140 ft above sea level. Altimeters determine altitude relative to sea level.
     
    #125 StupidMoniker, Oct 8, 2010
  6. marks0223

    marks0223 2017 and 2022 World Series Champions
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    11,888
    Likes Received:
    17,483
    Conspiracy theorists like to leave out those details.
     
    #126 marks0223, Oct 8, 2010
  7. TheRealist137

    TheRealist137 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Messages:
    35,460
    Likes Received:
    22,625
    WTC 7 was the "headquarters" of the entire conspiracy so they needed to demolish it too in order to hide all the evidence.
     
    #127 TheRealist137, Oct 9, 2010
  8. ToyCen428

    ToyCen428 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    124
    Dude if I posted articles/videos to all my findings over the last few years, I'd be here 3 days searching. If you want to see them , just ask. Here is the Flight 77 Data breakdown. Long video so I'll give you time lapse marks to view.

    <embed id=VideoPlayback src=http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=2833924626286859522&hl=en&fs=true style=width:400px;height:326px allowFullScreen=true allowScriptAccess=always type=application/x-shockwave-flash> </embed>

    From 10:00 to 22:00 is really striking information. If this data is correct, then it's physically impossibly for the Pentagon crime scene to have been from this airplane.

    20:30 is a good spot... talks about from the RAW data file of the flight data, the plane never went below 273 ft (Pentagon is 71ft tall, light poles are 40ft) my #'s were way off before.
     
    #128 ToyCen428, Oct 9, 2010
  9. ToyCen428

    ToyCen428 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    124
    Check out the video I posted above. You'll see the flight animation, and statistics which disprove (if true) the Plane theory of the Pentagon.


    To answer your questions, I don't have too much information of the moon hoax, ALTHOUGH, there is a guy out there on Youtube who is schooling NASA on debating the fake moon theory. Digging up old audio clips from the landing on the moon, and showing conflicting stories in the audio recordings.

    Here's a few of his videos... they speak for themselves.

    <object width="480" height="460"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yEQNZQdJFtI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yEQNZQdJFtI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="460"></embed></object>

    <object width="480" height="460"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Nz5sfwyvAK0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Nz5sfwyvAK0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="460"></embed></object>

    <object width="480" height="460"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_tTAK77Df7w?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_tTAK77Df7w?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="460"></embed></object>

    <object width="480" height="460"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GGh_t_cpEI0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GGh_t_cpEI0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="460"></embed></object>

    <object width="480" height="460"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NsnJSwKol68?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NsnJSwKol68?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="460"></embed></object>

    Very hard to argue with this young Aussie!

    And reguarding Area 51, alien life that exist there I'm not sure about, alien technology I'm absolutely possitive. Although, I do believe alien life exist in a small town in New Mexico.
     
    #129 ToyCen428, Oct 9, 2010
  10. ToyCen428

    ToyCen428 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    124
    Watch my video explaining it. They also bring the information you just mentioned into the equation.
     
    #130 ToyCen428, Oct 9, 2010
  11. ToyCen428

    ToyCen428 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    124
    It's media as a WHOLE. There's so much video footage that was shown on 9/11 that was never ever re-broadcast or retold, because it reflects against the OS. There is a website I can give you if you want, that has the entire days worth of footage from every major news source out there on 9/11. It's crazy because there are so many people to call in to the news channel, and describe the planes they saw as being a smaller plane, not a boeing twin engine jet liner... one caller says plane #2 looked exactly like plane #1.



    Addressing the BBC mistake when reporting the WTC7 collapse news, I think it has a more simple explanation. 30 minutes prior to the report, NBC was reporting that WTC7 was weak and should be collapsing shortly... so BBC kind of jumps the gun and reports it has collapsed, given 30 minutes as enough time for a weak building to fall to the ground.

    The building owner picked that one morning out of the past 5-6 years to NOT have breakfast in the Windows of the World restaurant. Lucky guy?
     
    #131 ToyCen428, Oct 9, 2010
  12. ToyCen428

    ToyCen428 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    124
    View the google video I posted above, please. Those details are there. Along with other details you should find intriguing.
     
    #132 ToyCen428, Oct 9, 2010
  13. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,986
    Likes Received:
    36,840
    ToyCen, I have seen some videos about Columbus's voyage being faked in 1492. I'm serious. Have you seen those? I'll see if I can find them. Very interesting stuff.

    edit: quiet, Cheetah. The grownups are talking here about important things.
     
    #133 B-Bob, Oct 9, 2010
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2010
  14. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,748
    [​IMG]
     
    #134 KingCheetah, Oct 9, 2010
  15. ToyCen428

    ToyCen428 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    124
    Ha.... can't believe someone would talk sensible to me so I call FAKE!

    On a serious note, I've seen nothing of the such.
     
    #135 ToyCen428, Oct 9, 2010
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 7 of 7

Share This Page